| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Fri, 04 Feb 2005, 12:01am Post subject: Discussion: Why you suck at LHE (for newbs) |
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 4576 WPP: 87
Location: TagFish
|
|
If you havent had a chance to look at it, its:
http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6613
And, since you locked it and we have no further way to discuss it, I decided to make a discussion thread on it.
First off, I'm going to come out and say I dislike you locking your thread, thereby leaving no open room for discussion, among other things.
If you were to number them, they would look something like this:
| fnord wrote: |
1. You play too many hands
2. You chase with bad pot odds
3. You call 2+ small bets cold pre-flop with offsuit hands (AQo, AJo, QJo, KTo, etc.)
4. You don't raise AKo
5. You don't 3-bet/cap AA,KK,QQ,AK
6. You fold pretty good hands for 1 bet in big pots
7. You open the pot for a limp outside of UTG/UTG+1 at a full table.
8. You ignore the size of the pot
9. You think you can "punish" a flush draw
10. You play unsuited cards with one big card and a little one
11. You play suited crap out of position and for more than one bet outside of your blinds
12. You play your blinds too much when facing a raise (particularly heads-up)
13. You think playing over-cards is your biggest leak
14. You don't bet the river often enough
15. You under-estimate how much of your profit comes from AA,KK,AK
16. You under-estimage how much of your profit comes from players that suck worse than you and fail to seek them out.
17. You go all-in
18. You under-estimate the impact and diverse forms of luck over the short term.
19. You under-estimate what long term is. 10,000 hands isn't long-term.
|
Okay, lets get started.
1-6, 8, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16 I AGREE with you, enough to at least not to get an argument over. Capping with AKo opposed to AKs I 'might' disagree with you, it depends on the game.
7. This depends on the table you are at and with what hand you have. An open limp with low PP or Axs is usually a good play on a loose table, probably good up to 2/4, and even some 3/6 tables. I only like to see raising at this point in more Tight-aggressive tables.
9 and 17, What the heck are you talking about?
12. It really is dependant on the table, your hands, and the position of the player. A tag bet from UTG that folds around is probably a good fold. However, a raise from a more later position might justify a call. As long as your outs aren't tainted, you have a 40/60 chance to win, not bad for calling 1 small bet to win 3.5.
13. You are a big vague here, I wish you would define your idea as overcards and then leak. A huge leak IS going to far with your overcards, especially when the opposition wont fold.
18. I will not comment.
19. 10000 hands to the average player is a sizeable amount of hands. Someone who clears 2000 hands a day such as yourself thinks 10k hands as nothing. Someone who hasnt cleared 10000 hands over the course of 3-4 months will disagree with you. No way a hot streak of cards can go over 3-4 months (i say that generally speaking)
And finally, I disagree with your comment (albeit sarcastic) about the Poker Books. The 19 points above are just the small things that one needs to worry about, Poker Books HARDLY deals with the little things, and focus on the Big leaks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 Feb 2005, 12:05am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 3571 WPP: 78
Location: emo-kid
|
|
i got a chuckle out of the going all in remark
that just means you ran outta money! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 Feb 2005, 12:17am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 1452 WPP: 76
Location: im so asian
|
|
Let the games begin.
I think in number 12 he is talking about the people that will call any raise in the blinds.........there are plenty of them out there.
17.You go all in. I am going to guess this is refering to losing all your money putting you all in. A good player always has enough money to cap every street if needed.
19. All I have to say is sample size  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 Feb 2005, 12:18am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 1452 WPP: 76
Location: im so asian
|
|
| What about raising the turn heads up with a weak draw. I get that ALL the time. That should be on the list also. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 Feb 2005, 12:21am Post subject: |
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 4576 WPP: 87
Location: TagFish
|
|
Oh yeah, i forgot to mention, add some of your own  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 Feb 2005, 1:33am Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 20 Jan 2005
Posts: 130 WPP: 53
Location: Sweden
|
|
| trikflow77 wrote: | | What about raising the turn heads up with a weak draw. I get that ALL the time. That should be on the list also. |
Yeah, or A-high -.O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 Feb 2005, 1:52am Post subject: Re: Discussion: Why you suck at LHE (for newbs) |
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17119 WPP: 83
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
10k hands is 10k hands, it doesn't matter over what duration you play them so talking about streaks and months is silly.
I'm mostly directing the post at the newbies I see comming from the micro tables and the lemmings I see at live games. It pretty much covers the HUGE chip spewing leaks I see over and over again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 Feb 2005, 1:52am Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17119 WPP: 83
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
| trikflow77 wrote: | | What about raising the turn heads up with a weak draw. I get that ALL the time. That should be on the list also. |
It's a good play if there is a chance you can get your opponent to fold. Or if you have showdown value and plan to check behind on the river. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 Feb 2005, 1:57am Post subject: Re: Discussion: Why you suck at LHE (for newbs) |
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17119 WPP: 83
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
| elipsesjeff wrote: |
9. You think you can "punish" a flush draw
13. You think playing over-cards is your biggest leak
9 and 17, What the heck are you talking about?
13. You are a big vague here, I wish you would define your idea as overcards and then leak. A huge leak IS going to far with your overcards, especially when the opposition wont fold.
|
I see players focus so much on how to play over-cards and deal with flush draws when their games have massive gapping leaks, just just about any point on that list. I see lots of funny plays justified by "punishing the flush draw". They just don't get that in limit a flush draw is a REALLY good hand, particularly in a loose game. The flush draw ain't chasing shit, he's probably got a shitload of equity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 Feb 2005, 6:20am Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 58 WPP: 100
|
|
| Going allin is horrible because it's money that you can't double up on. You should always have enough chips at the table to play your normal game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 Feb 2005, 6:56am Post subject: Re: Discussion: Why you suck at LHE (for newbs) |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 1277 WPP: 105
Location: Drowning in prosperity
|
|
| Fnord wrote: | | The flush draw ain't chasing shit, he's probably got a shitload of equity. |
But if your ahead, you're ahead. No one should misinterpret this point (which should be obvious is you do the pot equity calcs for a typical small stakes table) to mean that you shouldn't raise the flop if you think your hand is best. You just have to realize that the best hand and the second best hand (often a strong draw) should both be trying to get as much money as possible in to the pot on the flop. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 05 Feb 2005, 2:43am Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 90 WPP: 115
|
|
| you mean AKs not AKo right? |
Last edited by jbmagic on Sat, 05 Feb 2005, 11:03am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 05 Feb 2005, 6:01am Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 58 WPP: 100
|
|
The difference between AKs and AKo isnt that great.
And the you're a bad player because "you don't" is a double negative as in "you should do X", which is what you're saying.
Of course it isnt always true blah blah but that's a bit too complex for someone these tips would help. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 05 Feb 2005, 9:42am Post subject: |
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 4576 WPP: 87
Location: TagFish
|
|
| Depending on the game, I may not cap AKo. If its HU and a Rock raises i'll call the three bet. At lower limits though I'd almost always cap it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 05 Feb 2005, 11:02am Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 90 WPP: 115
|
|
5. You don't 3-bet/cap AA,KK,QQ,AK
why not?
i tought your suppose to 3bet/cap AA,KK,QQ,AK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 05 Feb 2005, 11:15am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 3571 WPP: 78
Location: emo-kid
|
|
| jbmagic wrote: | 5. You don't 3-bet/cap AA,KK,QQ,AK
why not?
i tought your suppose to 3bet/cap AA,KK,QQ,AK |
read the title of the list  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 05 Feb 2005, 2:06pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 401 WPP: 373
|
|
I love the way fnord is so blunt.
It is almost like ok boys, you suck, here's why, you still suck, I can smell the suckage from over here, please come play at my table.
At low limits with gamblers and rec players, those rules are absolutely on point. At higher limits, you break all of them. Knowing when to break them determines whether you win or lose at say 10/20 and up.
Great post Fnord.
Soupie |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 05 Feb 2005, 3:41pm Post subject: |
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 4576 WPP: 87
Location: TagFish
|
|
| soupie wrote: |
At low limits with gamblers and rec players, those rules are absolutely on point. At higher limits, you break all of them. Knowing when to break them determines whether you win or lose at say 10/20 and up.
|
I definately agree with you here, I'm glad someone said it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 06 Feb 2005, 12:36pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 416 WPP: 142
Location: golf course
|
|
Fnord, I have a suggestion for # 20 of why people suck at LIM
20. Even though you have a sufficent bankroll(presumably), you only bring $200 to 300 into a 10/20 game. I don't know how may times I have seen the following two scenerios.
1. Guy has KK with $43 dollars left and misses out on a big portion of the pot. He then "whines" a about bad-timing while he is rebuying.
2. Guy had $40 to $50 left and I think he is trying to rep the flop. Everyone else folds and I go after him with 2nd best pair and good kicker. His short stack has effectivley limited my potential loss. I may be behind, but I'll have free cards coming. Also, players get real frustated and (and their starting requiremenst can go out the window) when they are down to $40 from $400 -seems like they just want to get out or get set for a rebuy.
Ayway, I think this is one the weakest things I see in LIM. Short stacks.
Any thoughts, Fnord or others?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 06 Feb 2005, 1:03pm Post subject: |
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 4576 WPP: 87
Location: TagFish
|
|
I'll agree with you, but i think this is a variation of the 'Going All-in.'
You should always have at least 12 BB so you are to cap every street. A lot of people sit with 25, I like to sit with around 50.
If you get down to 40 from 400 you are probably hoping for some mere luck, when you should have left the table a long time ago.
I've seen it happen too, Players with under $100 at a 5/10 table are my favorite!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 06 Feb 2005, 1:37pm Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 21 Dec 2004
Posts: 149 WPP: 115
|
|
Can we add to this:
Playing at the wrong table with not enough chips.
I think table selection is often under rated and see many people sit down at thw rong table and under stacked. I love it when everyone at the table has 30-40 and someoen sits down with 10. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 06 Feb 2005, 4:12pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 29 Apr 2004
Posts: 1064 WPP: 108
Location: San Francisco
|
|
Just wanted to say, "Nice post Fnord".
I am a No Limit player who occasionly plays Limit in B&M casinos. I'm going to read and re-read these and really think about them, because I'm sure some on them apply to me.
Thanks also to Jeff for getting the ball rolling on the discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 07 Feb 2005, 10:48pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 416 WPP: 142
Location: golf course
|
|
Fnord, I have two more for the why I suck list
21. You "always" check when you miss the flop (you never rep the flop)
22. You 'always' bet when you hit the flop (never check-raise or slow play)
There is not better "fish" to play against than the ones that do the two things above. Short of seeing their cards, you can't ask for much more. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 08 Feb 2005, 1:15am Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17119 WPP: 83
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
|
|
|