|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Tue, 24 Apr 2007, 12:04am Post subject: NHLE T&P - Week 16 Discussion p. 286-298
|
 |
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 3380
WPP: 84
Location: practicing mindfulness
|
|
This is the end!
1. Concept No. 54: Checking to induce a bluff is a significantly stronger play in no limit than it is in limit. S&M give a couple of examples on p. 288-289 in which you have TPMK or TPTK on drawy boards and they recommend checking behind the turn to induce a bluff rather than betting to charge a draw and protect your hand. In the second example you have AhQh on a QdTd7h8h board. What do you think about the merits of checking behind vs. betting here? What other factors are important?
2.. Concept No. 55: Unlike limit, limping first in on the button is frequently correct. S&M explain:
| Quote: | | Raising in deep stack no limit is rarely intended to steal the blinds. It's used to get value for good hands, manipulate the pot size, semi-bluff, and for other reasons. If everyone folds to you on the the button, and you raise, you're usually doing it because you want to build a pot while you have position, not because you want to win the paltry blind money. |
I'd love to get a discussion going about this, b/c I doubt many successful FTR'ers ever open-limp from the button. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot rate topics in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by
.
Forum style based on NoseBleed by mikelothar.com.
|
FTR25: CakePoker $100 Money-Added Tourney January 25th!!
