| Author |
Message |
|
Post rating:
Posted: Wed, 06 Sep 2006, 9:14pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 2195 WPP: 52
Location: NZ
|
|
| make sure you play somewhere with Rakeback. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Thu, 07 Sep 2006, 11:40am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 944 WPP: 117
Location: Vancouver
|
|
| The_MaestroAu wrote: | | TerryToma wrote: | Good luck.
Two things.. you keep saying "I WONT LOSE MONEY!".. well what are you going to say to yourself if you start with a downswing??
. |
"Omg. What was I thinking" *slaps self* lol
You know.....all my life (Im 35) Ive never known what I wanted to do, so instead Ive charmed and blagged and bullsh*tted my way into a half decent career/income as an account manager. A job I really dont enjoy and are not particulary good at because of it
Now I finally have something I can throw myself at with all my heart. And if it turns out i really do have an aptitude for this game.... the benefit will be I'll be my own boss making good or even great money doing something I love
OR...I fall flat on my face and return to the workforce with my tail between my legs havinglost a few months salary
Its worth a shot
Thanks for your GL's |
Yeah that is a very well grounded approach to it, i hope it works out well for you with whatever you decide to do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Thu, 07 Sep 2006, 12:05pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 02 May 2006
Posts: 3469 WPP: 60
Location: TAGfishery
|
|
good luck man. keep us posted.
...and Irisheyes, your new avatar is incredible. it makes me want to do the "boat motor" thing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Thu, 07 Sep 2006, 4:19pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 3173 WPP: 68
Location: over there
|
|
| Bode-ist wrote: | good luck man. keep us posted.
...and Irisheyes, your new avatar is incredible. it makes me want to do the "boat motor" thing |
It makes you want to do the what!!? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Fri, 08 Sep 2006, 10:11am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 2736 WPP: 110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Tue, 26 Sep 2006, 6:15am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 2736 WPP: 110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Tue, 26 Sep 2006, 5:30pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 53 WPP: 152
|
|
Still 3 weeks from goin full time, work wanted me to stay on a bit and I agreed. if nothing else to increase my bankroll
Bought a few new books and among them a fantastic one written my Mark Blade called "The Essential Guide to playing for a living"
If you are thinking of turning pro YOU MUST BUY THIS 1st. Wish I had although it wouldnt have made much difference to my decision
Anyway Ive got myself all set up now with a proper desk, 21" screen etc set up away fromthe TV and surrounded by my poker musings. Done all my maths etc on my ROI's and all I need to do is get through 100 $50 turbo sng's (my playground) and I'll make about $1280 conservatively a week. Two tabling that'll take me about 25 hours so will leave some time for reflection/study and a few MTT's
My results have been good lately, just missed a couple of final tables (12th/13th) in 700 player buy ins after playing almost perfectly then knocked out with my Ak losing to Aj then my 10-10 to A4. OPR ranking is still just under 98%. Building my roll steadily on the turbo sitngoes, despite burning about $400 when drunk lol must stop that. I only quit that night when I realised I couldnt see my cards I turn into a belligerent hyper bluffing lunatic when drunk hahahah oops
I'll post here after/during my 1st week. My last day at work is 20th October. But i might take off for a short holiday, 8 years with a corporate...think I deserve one |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Tue, 26 Sep 2006, 6:01pm Post subject: |
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 4570 WPP: 87
Location: TagFish
|
|
I just found this.
My thoughts: I've been a poker pro on here as long as some of the more distinguished names, and longer than many who have made much more than me. Although my student status exemplifies me somewhat as a pro, I still consider myself one.
First off, BMX, you're an awesome player, but you're like what, 18 or 19? Someone who has never worked more than a part time job at a mcdonalds (or other shitty high school job) doesn't really know how horrible it is to get up at 6 am, go to work and come home miserable, only to do it again tomorrow. You can imagine it, but how can you know truly how it feels? I'm not saying I know this either, but to someone who is middleaged, he must think we live a dream life.
Ilikeaces: Again dude, I give you (and always have) mad props on your success and skillz, and, although like a year and a half ago you laughed at me for 'still going to school' i'm glad to see you are doing it yourself. You two are in one category, whereas myself and most other pros on this forum are in a completely different one.
One of you guys say that you need to make over $100 an hour and another says to have earned $100k before turning pro. This, in my opinion, are two horrible overstatements. You guys know how many years and/or education requirements it takes to make $100k/year or more at a job? The majority of people in this world cant even make 1/2 or 1/3 of that and still survive and be happy. I made like $55k last year from poker, while still in school and turning pro in June. That amount is more than the majority of my family members, all of which are considered middle class. You guys think that if you can't make $100 per hour its not worth, well, thats not true. I'd gladly put in 30 hours a week at $60 per hour than work 45 hours a week for $55k/year.
You don't need to make $100 an hour to be a pro, but you shouldnt be making any less than what you would be at your job (including taxes). $100/hour is equivalent to a 200k/year job, something that is very hard to come buy. If you can do $50 an hour, that's pretty kick ass regardless. You should have at least a year to a year and a half living expenses. Also, have a budget and make sure you are good with money. I think a bigger thing is to have a mental toughness and confidence that when the downswing comes, you can handle it.
Renton (who i consider pretty similar to myself) and cocco_bill have given the most clear cut advice in this thread. My advice on this matter is: do what makes you happy. If you hate your job, fucking quit; they don't care about you and you are replaceable. Maybe poker isnt right for you and maybe its not right for me either. But, you've got the right attitude in that, if you don't make it you lose some salary and you go back and live the way you were. It isnt a matter of life or death, and frankly, I would hate to always wonder "what could have been" if i never went pro.
Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Fri, 29 Sep 2006, 10:31am Post subject: Self Insurance |
|
|
High Card

Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 5 WPP: 193
|
|
First post.
I suppose this is a question that all self-employed people face, but has there been a discussion here about getting self-insured? I suppose it's even more difficult than your typical self-employed person when they see your line of work is "pro poker player". It would be ideal to have a spouse who's insurance from work you could piggy back off but none-the-less can any of the pros comment to that end on their experiences to date with obtaining health/dental/life insurance in the US?
Heck have pro poker players even tried to collectively bargin a group plan with any insurance companies?
I feel like there may be a market for professional poker advisors, who would advise on the tax issues, self-insurance, etc.
Anyway, TIA for all comments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Fri, 29 Sep 2006, 10:49am Post subject: |
|
|
HABITUAL LINE-STEPPER

Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 5116 WPP: 73
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
| elipsesjeff wrote: | | One of you guys say that you need to make over $100 an hour and another says to have earned $100k before turning pro. This, in my opinion, are two horrible overstatements. |
It absolutely isn't an overstatement. In order to survive playing poker for a living you need to grossly overshoot the traditional parameters of making "good money", because at poker you can go a month or more without making money. The exaggeration of your actual salary over a traditional salary allows you to be prepared for these dry spells. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Fri, 29 Sep 2006, 10:56am Post subject: Re: Self Insurance |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 666 WPP: 95
Location: Decatur, IL
|
|
| rusticity wrote: | First post.
I suppose this is a question that all self-employed people face, but has there been a discussion here about getting self-insured? I suppose it's even more difficult than your typical self-employed person when they see your line of work is "pro poker player". It would be ideal to have a spouse who's insurance from work you could piggy back off but none-the-less can any of the pros comment to that end on their experiences to date with obtaining health/dental/life insurance in the US?
Heck have pro poker players even tried to collectively bargin a group plan with any insurance companies?
I feel like there may be a market for professional poker advisors, who would advise on the tax issues, self-insurance, etc.
Anyway, TIA for all comments. |
I got health and dental insurance plans from Blue Cross/Blue Shield easily and cheaply. I don't think they ever even asked about what my job was. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Fri, 29 Sep 2006, 11:08am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 666 WPP: 95
Location: Decatur, IL
|
|
| Renton wrote: | | elipsesjeff wrote: | | One of you guys say that you need to make over $100 an hour and another says to have earned $100k before turning pro. This, in my opinion, are two horrible overstatements. |
It absolutely isn't an overstatement. In order to survive playing poker for a living you need to grossly overshoot the traditional parameters of making "good money", because at poker you can go a month or more without making money. The exaggeration of your actual salary over a traditional salary allows you to be prepared for these dry spells. |
This is almost completely dependent on where you live and how much money you have saved up. I live in central Illinois where I rent a nice house with one of my friends for $375/month each. If I was living in LA or New York, I would obviously be paying WAY WAY more in rent. Other expenses are similarly cheaper here. By the time I graduated college and then lived with my parents for 3 months, I had over 2 years living expenses saved up(not including my poker bankroll). So, would I really need to be making 100k/year or $100/hour? Obviously, I don't. I am on pace this year to make about half of those figures, and I have managed to save a large portion of my income despite having a 2 month period in February/March that were completely crappy poker-wise. Heck, I could make a decent living and still manage to save some money without a bad month affecting me at all if I was only making 30k/year at poker. Really, it is just all about money-management. If you don't overspend while running good, you will be able to afford running bad no matter what your income is as long as it's reasonable at all. That being said, playing poker for a living if you are barely covering your expenses from month to month is just obviously a bad idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Fri, 29 Sep 2006, 11:27am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 2736 WPP: 110
|
|
I think it all comes down to what you need to get out of it. I'm in canada, so if I just needed to get away from my 9-5 grind to find something else to do. Part time work making $10k or $15k a year and playing poker may be all I need.(Not me necassarilly) My poker winnings are tax free, so if I'm making $25/ hr x 40=$1k plus benifits then if I can consistantly make $17 / hr x 40= $680 playing poker, I'm about break even minus the benifits. If I take a part time job and make $200 after taxes a week it lowers my necassary income from poker to $480 a week. Now I take into account my commute costs me $75 a week in gas, now my income needed from poker is $405. Meaning if I play poker for 40 hrs a week,( I do that some weeks with a job) I need to make just over a $10 /hr playing poker. Last I checked, that's .2 BB/HR @ $50NL amirite?
I understand the ideas that you guys are saying about needing the bankroll for your living and downswings. But shit man, I'm 42 with 20 years in this industry and need a break. give me something to wish for. I don't need $100k a year, fuck, I've been making just under 60K for a few years now and you guys may not know the grind involved. Is there any guys out there that have lived that dream. I'm 42, have a wife and kid, hate my job, has had to deal with moron bosses and coworkers and need to be home more often just because, I've been there done it, It sucks.
Warpe??? and whoever else was in that 35-54 age bracket??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Fri, 29 Sep 2006, 11:47am Post subject: |
|
|
HABITUAL LINE-STEPPER

Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 5116 WPP: 73
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
| im only 22, but I definitely know what the 9/5 grind is like. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Fri, 29 Sep 2006, 12:12pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 2736 WPP: 110
|
|
| Renton wrote: | | im only 22, but I definitely know what the 9/5 grind is like. | I respect that Renton but do that same basic job for 20 years and add shiftwork. 1 week midnights, 1 week afternoons, 1 week days. Day in day out 2 weeks off a year. Commuting 60- miles each way. It may sound like whining but I'm not. I have a house a 100 yards from lake simcoe, a grand cherokee, a hyundai for the commute, a great wife and kid and on and on.
Hell it's not all bad. It's may just be a case of the grass is always greener. I'd like to see the other yard and see how it feels. I don't think anybody living on poker has a cakewalk. I just think that I'd switch your stresses for mine anyday because mine have been the same for ever. And while were dishing out wishes, can I be 22 again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Fri, 29 Sep 2006, 2:09pm Post subject: |
|
|
High Card

Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 5 WPP: 193
|
|
Thanks for the response Nehmer. I suppose I'll give them a call.
Regarding the OP:
The hourly rate you need to make is definitely relative. It sounds like we have part-timers players/students arguing with someone trying to replicate a salaried job with benefits.
I think we can agree that if we're trying to replicate a salaried job with benefits with an hourly rate playing poker, you can't simply take the current salary divided by 2000 hours and conclude that's what I need to maintain the same quality of life / standard of living.
The question remains then: What's the multiplier for comparing an hourly poker wage with a salried job with benefits. If I earn 100k / year, could I quit and survive off $50/hr online 2000 hours of year cardplaying? Could I replace 50k with $25/hr?
There's pros and cons that can individually affect this conversion rate / multiplier for replicating a salaried job with poker earnings.
Pros to poker. These are personal reasons why one might accept a lower hourly wage playing cards.
1- How much you like your current job?
2- How much would you value a flexible schedule?
3- Does your current job actually require more like 2500 hours instead of 2000?
4- Do you have a long commute.
5- Does your job give your direct practice that will enhance your future earnings (as hours logged at the tables enhances hourly rate earned)
6- Do you have a spouse who's insurance discounts you can piggyback off of?
Cons to poker (why you need to make more per hour than your current salaried job)
1- Variance, poker would be like a sales job, you need reserves, because you don't make the same from month to month.
2- Self-Insurance is higher
3- No benefits (no Bonus/no 401k match/etc/etc)
4- Raises may be guaranteed with your current job.
I'm missing a lot here obviously, but it's a start.
The conservative number I keep hitting at is +50%. I would tend to think, that you might want to be able to replicate your salary/2000 times 1.5 .
So a salaried 50k worker should feel $37.5/hr would leave them very comfortable. A 100k should aim for $50/hr. I sort of think this accounts for the cons, and then on a personal level you can adjust down for any pros (listed above) that affect you on a personal level and would allow you to get by for less.
This relationship also is NOT linear of course. But feels conservatively right IMO (granted an opinion with no particular expertise) for the middle class range. If you're making 25,000 a year you probably don't have much in terms of benefits anyway, so I'd settle for no multiplier, and if I made a ton, well there's diminishing returns, and money really isn't an issue as much as personal happiness is.
Caveat - And it's a big one. This is from a non-pro looking out. I definitely seek feedback from both successes and failures on thought process in this post.
*********
Aside - Sample Sizes
I've searched a bit, but is there a good post/analysis on the number of hands/hours needed to feel comfortable with an hourly rate. I've used the stdev to do some Confidence Interval Analysis, but honestly don't feel too confident about what I was coming up with. If there's a thread out there with discussion on what # hands it takes to get within + or - $X of the true hourly rate, that would be great to look at. TIA. |
Last edited by rusticity on Fri, 29 Sep 2006, 3:03pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Fri, 29 Sep 2006, 2:37pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 976 WPP: 79
Location: New Zealand
|
|
Hey mate,
a Jafa here. Hope your career is going well. I haven't played the cash tables at Auckland Casino yet. Am I missing out here? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Fri, 29 Sep 2006, 4:41pm Post subject: |
|
|
Two Pair

Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 29 WPP: 175
|
|
The online poker community will change if this bill passes as the amount of US player will dramatically drop.
The U.S. Congress is Trying to Ban
Online Poker TODAY!!!
THIS IS NOT A TEST - Call Your Senator Now!
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is attaching the Internet Gambling Prohibition Act to a bill that is expected to be approved by the Congress early this evening. PLEASE call your Senators today and tell them that they should oppose the Internet gambling bill being part of Port Security legislation.
If the Port Security bill passes, with the Internet gambling language included, your ability to enjoy poker online will be at serious risk.
Each member of the Poker Players Alliance has two Senators which are listed below (or click here). They need to hear from you RIGHT NOW! Let them know that you care about your rights to play poker.
Please Call!!! Tell your Senators to oppose attaching Internet gambling to Port Security!
Click Here for your Senator's phone number. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Sat, 30 Sep 2006, 7:36pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 53 WPP: 152
|
|
| silu_nz wrote: | Hey mate,
a Jafa here. Hope your career is going well. I haven't played the cash tables at Auckland Casino yet. Am I missing out here? |
Hi Silu
I made about $10K up there over 200 hours just playing limit poker when it 1st opened, but the players have got better since then and now most the tables are cash ring games...which I dont enjoy/dont play/am therfore not very good at. My general impression is though there are some very good ring game players up there full time. Table selection would be pretty important
Dont start full time till Labour day, even then I am going to be help run those National poker league comps at night. Dont think I want to play online anymore than 25/30 hours a week, will need to get out of the house |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post rating:
Posted: Sat, 30 Sep 2006, 8:48pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 2195 WPP: 52
Location: NZ
|
|
| hi, consider not going pro now that the US has made online gambling illegal. A lot of the fish are americans. |
|
|
|
|
|
|