| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 5:21pm Post subject: $100 On Stars What Limit Should I Be Playing??? |
|
|
High Card
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 1
WPP: 16
|
|
| I want to stay withen my bankroll and grind this up...what limit should I be playing??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 5:24pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 3580
WPP: 79
Location: emo-kid
|
|
go with the 300BB rule for limit
30x buyin rule for no limit
if you're confident you're a good player than go with 200BB and 20x the buyin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 5:26pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95
WPP: 116
|
|
| 300 big blinds is the usual guideline, sooo...100 / 300 = .33. So, a .25/.50 limit game would be fine (blinds of .25 and .10). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 5:28pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 3580
WPP: 79
Location: emo-kid
|
|
| Brodie wrote: | | 300 big blinds is the usual guideline, sooo...100 / 300 = .33. So, a .25/.50 limit game would be fine (blinds of .25 and .10). |
actually the 300BB rule is 300 big bets, not big blinds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 5:28pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95
WPP: 116
|
|
Unless I'm wrong. 
BB = big blinds in this case, not big bets, right? If it's big bets than I'm all screwed up... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 5:34pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95
WPP: 116
|
|
| Ack, I was wrong. Ok, strike that, so, micro-limits for $100 bankroll then? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 29 Dec 2004, 7:58am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 813
WPP: 145
Location: Mount Holly, NC
|
|
| If you are going to play NL, I would play at the .05/.10 level with a $100 bankroll. At Poker Stars the max buyin at this level is $10...It is pushing the edge a little bit (only 10x the buyin) but it is high enough stakes to keep you interested. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 29 Dec 2004, 10:05am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 1476
WPP: 135
Location: moral high ground
|
|
Words of wisdom from Fnord, who probably stole it from someone else:
Play at the highest level that you can beat while staying within your bankroll.
So, don't play any level unless you are sure (ie, have statistical proof) you can beat it. If you are new to this, start at the lowest level regardless of your br. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 29 Dec 2004, 11:58am Post subject: |
|
|
EAT BUGS
Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7807
WPP: 51
Location: trying to live
|
|
bb = big blinds
i learned the hard way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 6:25pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95
WPP: 116
|
|
So, I've got 783 hands at .50/1 at Party and I'm at -2.79BB/100. Is that statistically significant enough to be concerned about or just variance? Fortunately tournament play has made up for the small loss, but should I start thinking about heading back to .25/.50 where I was at +11.55 BB/100 or stick it out a while longer?
(sorry for hijacking the thread, I love PokerTracker stat talk!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 6:34pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 22 Sep 2004
Posts: 1102
WPP: 80
Location: Wastin' away again in margaritaville....
|
|
I think that most of the guys will say that your sample size is too small...
It is probably just some adjustment variation to the new level. I'd give it some more time especially if you are breaking even with other play.
- sed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 6:35pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 22 Sep 2004
Posts: 1102
WPP: 80
Location: Wastin' away again in margaritaville....
|
|
You might have some leaks that didn't show up in the lower limit but the new players are taking advantage of it.
- sed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Events Mail - Join this reminder mailing list
