| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Tue, 22 Aug 2006, 5:20pm Post subject: Turning Pro. Potential Pitfalls and advice needed |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 53 WPP: 152
|
|
So Im thinking about it. Only half seriously that is ...its of course possible Im being a complete f00l so Id like to see some discussion here on what's it all about
Me as a player:
# Been playing for 2.5 years. Have spreadsheeting myself from the start and am profitable at kichen table games, local casino and online (although I had to catch up $1500 US online that I spent basically getting schooled)
# I've logged 200 hours at my local Casino and made a 10K profit mostly playing LIMIT 5/10. is 200 hours a big enough sample?
# Im doing well at nights playing mostly Party Poker and Paradise MTTs and 10 player ring games. Im pretty sure I could do considerably better if I full time serious. i.e. not already tired from my working day/not half watching TV at the same time/not stoned or half drunk some of the time etc
Also...Im a kiwi so with my time zone Im mostly playing when the poker rooms are half empty. When the rooms are at capacity does that mean more fish or less? I read someplace that 70% of all online poker players are North Americans? Is that correct? So how does that affect the fishyness of the action?
To be honest...one of my main concerns about turning pro is not so much the financial uncertainty/swings etc cos Im pretty sure I have the game, mentality and bankroll to get through that. Its the fact that I LOVE POKER, and worry that doing it for a living will ruin all that. I actually hate playing at my local Casino because of the discipline involved in playing a winning game makes it all so freakin BORING. If I turned pro however I would make myself play there a few nights a week to ensure at least some income if online wasnt going well.Seriously the players at the Auckland Casino are diabolical
Not sure if this belongs in this particular forum....but yeah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 22 Aug 2006, 5:45pm Post subject: |
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 7448 WPP: 71
Location: Doncaster, Eng-er-land
|
|
how big is your bankroll?
First get PokerTracker and PAHud to aide you and show some figures from a decent sized sample, say 30-50k. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 22 Aug 2006, 6:21pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 488 WPP: 220
Location: Being the King of Shaving your privates
|
|
| Something about turning pro in the beginners circle just doesnt seem right. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 22 Aug 2006, 7:25pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 96 WPP: 66
Location: Down Under
|
|
I will reply to just one part of your post...the time zone concerns.
As you, i play at US off - peak (I live in australia), and find the game alot tighter and harder to extract value from post-flop. For me the best time to play is saturday and sunday mornings into afternoons, which is friday and saturday night in the US.
I usually grind it out and really work on my play throughout the week where i can only play US off-peak, then ramp it up with some MTT's on the weekends. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 22 Aug 2006, 7:44pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 53 WPP: 152
|
|
Agree this is in the wrong section, can a MOD move to the appropriate forum please
Thanks for your post jak and I kind of agree, Ive done very well some Saturday afternoons as well but have often encountered a bunch of goddamn rocks when playing weeknights -down under time- Particulary at the limit tables. I must try get my lazy azz out of bed a bit earlier on some weekends soon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 22 Aug 2006, 7:47pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 96 WPP: 66
Location: Down Under
|
|
It is well worth your time on weekends mate. I see moves with regularity on W/ends, that i may see once a night on the 100NL ring games at stars. It is a blow out sometimes the difference in standard of games.
lol though, most weekends i get to bed at 6am if i am lucky (ie. drunk), then sleep all day, so it is rare to have a dedicated poker weekend. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 22 Aug 2006, 7:57pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 1120 WPP: 128
|
|
| Quote: | | # I've logged 200 hours at my local Casino and made a 10K profit mostly playing LIMIT 5/10. is 200 hours a big enough sample? |
Not even close.
With just 200 hours in you dont even know if you are profitable at the game....
| Quote: | | # Im doing well at nights playing mostly Party Poker and Paradise MTTs and 10 player ring games. Im pretty sure I could do considerably better if I full time serious. i.e. not already tired from my working day/not half watching TV at the same time/not stoned or half drunk some of the time etc |
FIRST get a long term profitable record, THEN think about going pro.
Long term is 250,000+ hands of profitable poker.
I can tell you from being there that being overbankrolled is critical... I'm in a constant fight (and have been for months) to pay bills while not totally killing my bankroll...
My hourly income is crippled because I dont have the bankroll to play where I was playing (and makeing good money at) leaving me stuck at a much lower level and working loads of overtime trying to make up for my past mistakes... And until I make enough to cover not only bills, but also increase my bankroll back to the 50+ buyin's level, I cant relax and take time off.
Poker is a brutal game at times, and you must have the bankroll to cover the swings and pay bills at the same time. (aka, you need to be able to handle 2 negative months in a row without being underbankrolled.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 22 Aug 2006, 8:42pm Post subject: |
|
|
HABITUAL LINE-STEPPER

Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 4992 WPP: 73
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
| Jishu wrote: | | Something about turning pro in the beginners circle just doesnt seem right. |
The beginners circle is for beginners at anything, including beginners at professional play.
OP: I have a solid winrate for 180k hands and I still feel extremely qualmy about going pro. I am doing it anyway though, because I can't hold a decent job during school and this is my only way to cash in.
If you have something to fall back on then go for it if you think you are good. Thankfully, I do design projects for architectural firms to make some side cash whenever I am running bad at poker. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 22 Aug 2006, 8:58pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 53 WPP: 152
|
|
Thanks for that Leelin...I guess the problem is this though
You say get a long term profitable record before turning pro, but playing maybe 2-3 hours a night when already tired from a "proper job" is never really going to give me the greatest sample. A -- it'll take too long to pull together the hours needed and B-- They are not quality hours
Im thinking this is a situation where you just have to work out how much you are prepared to lose, give yourself a period of time to work with, and take the plunge. Playing motivated and alert at optimum times of the day could only improve my results......surely. UNLESS of course I've just been unbelievable lucky so far, (a possibility that has not escaped me)
Believe me....... telling my friends/family that "Im quitting my job to play poker full time" will qualify me for unbelievable amounts of ridicule. And possibly rightly so. Maybe I am being stupid ........and this uncertainty is the reasons I am posting here. I am along way away from making this decision, Im just looking for perspective from you guys
I really hope Im not coming across as someone who thinks he's the man, because I do not think that. I am well aware of the amount of mistakes I make at the table. They are many ...but they do not repeat themselves often. (unless Im tired .....or worse....smashed) But I am right on the mark of the top 2% of players on officalpokerrankings.com. I seem to have little problem breaking the bubble in around 26% of MTT's played. Is that significant? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 22 Aug 2006, 9:26pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 1581 WPP: 55
Location: Pillaging Donksville
|
|
| Couldn't you take a week's "holiday" off work, play poker for 8 hours a day those days, and see what happens? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 22 Aug 2006, 9:38pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 53 WPP: 152
|
|
Thats the plan over Xmas ash
"family" pffft
Poker BOH!
:) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 22 Aug 2006, 9:41pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 1120 WPP: 128
|
|
| Quote: |
You say get a long term profitable record before turning pro, but playing maybe 2-3 hours a night when already tired from a "proper job" is never really going to give me the greatest sample. A -- it'll take too long to pull together the hours needed and B-- They are not quality hours |
Then dont go pro.
Really.
If you cant get the numbers, then your not ready. You dont even know how well you play yet. You dont know if you can even make money yet...
I'd suggest spending the weekends playing a lot of poker to get that history when your not tired from work...
Treat it like a second job... put in 10 hours every weekend playing several tables, and you will be able to get the hands needed to know how your doing....
Use the time to build your bankroll playing poker. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 23 Aug 2006, 1:07am Post subject: |
|
|
Crazy Canadian Courtiebwnage

Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 2175 WPP: 101
Location: xianti made me do it
|
|
| The_MaestroAu wrote: | | Agree this is in the wrong section, can a MOD move to the appropriate forum please |
{moved at author's request} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 23 Aug 2006, 3:31am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 3124 WPP: 68
Location: over there
|
|
IMO you are a long way from having the knowledge of your game and bankroll security that it takes to go pro. 200 hours at maybe 35 hands an hour is only really 7000 hands. Thi is a drop in the ocean compared to what it takes to know you are really a winning player over an extended period. It would be quite easy for a losing player to win over a 7000 hand sample. I'm not saying you are a losing player, I cant decide that for you, just that your 200 hour sample doesn't mean much.
Also the mental aspects of going pro are way more streneous then most people think. I've been playing "prefessionally" since the start of the summer and have currently been in a downswing for my last 60,000 hands. I know I am (or at least was and I can't for the love of God figure out what changed) a winning player yet I find this is happening to me. I would consider myself pretty good at handling stress but this has come to the point where I am literally losing sleep over it. In hindsight, if I could do a menial job for the same ammount of money I would switch to that in a flash.
I'm not an isolated case either. Downswings like this happen to other people. I know some of this has to do with me not playing my A game 100% of the time but most of it is just straight up bad luck. You wouldn't believe how hard it is to play really well when things are going shit either.
Luckily I have made and put safe enough to almost pay for next years living expenses in college. If I haden't done that I would be screwed right now. And I've learned a valuable lesson.
If I was going pro right now I would get a normal job until I had 3 months full living expenses saved up and a 150,000 hand sample at a particular game at a solid winrate (200NL or higher). Other then that I wouldn't consider it. I do plan on doing this after I finish college next year. One thing is for sure, I won't jump in with the naiveity that I did this time and make this huge mistake again. The stress just isn't worth it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 23 Aug 2006, 4:49am Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 53 WPP: 152
|
|
Thank you, very solid sounding advice and you are probably right. Well you are certainly right about my sample of played hands not being enough to make such an important decision one, and you are possibly right hat my casino play and OPR .com ranking are a bit on the flukey side
Guess I'll just have to play more poker to find out. damn
I hear you on the stress thing too, when I just thinking i was a rounder muthfarker at the local casino .....if I was playing with the usual idiots and they catching cards or maybe just couldnt find a hand.....my god I would get stressed and pissed off about it all . It was a really awful feeling too |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 23 Aug 2006, 4:56am Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 53 WPP: 152
|
|
I guess what Im saying there is because I more or less knew I was a better player than 90% of the people up there, I was doing something I didnt actually enjoy much because I figured i was earning money/working. ie I wanted and expected a return
I cant imagine how much more it would stress me if it was my sole scource of income as well, doesnt sound like much fun thats for sure  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 23 Aug 2006, 5:01am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 943 WPP: 117
Location: Vancouver
|
|
My suggestion is to not even consider going pro until these things have happenned.
1) figure out a very conservative bankroll for being pro
2) figure out what living expenses you need for a year
3) make the amount you think you need
4) make waaaay more than you think you need
5) play 200k hands minimum
6) go through an absolute terrible run that lasts for what seems like forever and come out of it
Then once you are finally able to roll around in 100 dollar bills if you should please, then its alright to go pro. I really think poker is a terrible terrible job unless you are making large sums of money, because if you aren't it is so likely that you will eventually BUSTO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 23 Aug 2006, 5:37am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 3124 WPP: 68
Location: over there
|
|
| Bmxicle wrote: | | . I really think poker is a terrible terrible job unless you are making large sums of money, because if you aren't it is so likely that you will eventually BUSTO. |
But to make large sums of money implies that you can also lose large sums of money. So surely the relative chances of going bust are the same. Or do you mean in a ptBB/100 sense? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 23 Aug 2006, 7:39am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 1251 WPP: 83
Location: Sweden
|
|
I had 1 year left of university when I decided to take a year off and play poker for a living. The year is now over and I've never been anywhere close to going busto with my very conservative Bankroll Management.
I started off multitabling 100NL and did so for a long time with little variance. Even at this level I never felt any stress to make enough money and I could take all the free time I wanted. I would say that its less stressful than almost any job since you don't need to keep times and you are responsible for nobody but yourself.
I then finally moved to 200NL and found that game to be almost as variance free. My biggest downswing at this limit has been no more than 7-8 buyins over about 150k+ hands. I've now also played an admittedly small number of 30k hands at 400NL with a largest downswing of 4 buyins.
In summary I have never been close to a losing month and losing weeks have been very rare. Maybe I am due to hit a huge downswing, but as for now I don't really share everyones assessment of the volatility of ones expected results as a proven long term winner. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 23 Aug 2006, 8:06am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 2616 WPP: 84
|
|
| Bill you must score really high in departments like mental stability, emotional control etc.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 23 Aug 2006, 10:31am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 1120 WPP: 128
|
|
| Quote: | | In summary I have never been close to a losing month and losing weeks have been very rare. Maybe I am due to hit a huge downswing, but as for now I don't really share everyones assessment of the volatility of ones expected results as a proven long term winner. |
I hate to say it, but just wait
I dont care how good you are, will hit 15+ buy-in swings sooner or later.
For a long time I agreed with you... but then I hit mine.
It wasnt that I was getting bad cards... You dont lose much money from not getting good cards...
It was that when I had QQ a calling station had KK and the flop would be J72 .. when I had KK the lag had AA... If I hit a flush, someone had a set and the board would pair...
It will happen sooner or later.. If you have the income set aside, and the bankroll to handle it, then it's a normal bump in the road... You review your hand history, know your playing well, and move on.
I had the bankroll, but not the income set aside.
I'll be paying for that mistake for a couple months. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 23 Aug 2006, 3:14pm Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 53 WPP: 152
|
|
You guys that have all turned pro...are you making your living playing just ring games? Is that how most pros areat it? I've noticed a few people 5 tabling 5/10 limit tables so I assume they are either poker mad lunatics or pros trying to multiply their edges. Are there people say 10 tabling low limit limit poker and using something like HoldemGenuis to help with pot odds decisions and grinding out cash that way?
How about being a MTT pro? Is that a realistic goal? Seems to me if you made a couple of top 3's a week in the bigger tourneys you wouldn't have too many financial problems, especially if you are managing to satellite into a few of them and adding the odd BIG payday by winning a large tourney or top 5-ing in a huge one.
My view here is possibly skewed by the fact I've won a couple of MTT's and came 2nd once paying me $1300, $1700 and $3100 each time. Now......that's a lot of (nz) $$ for 5 hours work. Even taking into account losing your buy in each other time, one result like that a week is well and truly enough to get by on. Of course I may well have just been a lucky f00l, and I guess that's what I need to establish
You guys are pros.....do you even play MTT's or is that considered a bit of a lottery?
Apart from MTT's I tend to play $10-$20 10 player ring games. With reasonable sucess but I would def need to improve a fair bit to make money consistantly there. My bankroll tends to suffer because of unprofessional management more than anything. ie I will be saying "one more game!" at midnight when Im really too tired or worse I'll get home steaming drunk and leap on eagerly.
Also....do you have what I would call a "poker workstation", surrounded by odds charts and even psychological prompts. I've found my prompt sheet works really well for me. It used to be I would be 4 hours into an MTT and find say......A-10 suited or 8-8 in late position folded to me and my brain would scream ALLLLL IN!!!!!!! and Id find myself doing it without really thinking. Then Id bust out and be furious for playing that long and making such a doofus decision to end it all. Making myself refer to my prompt sheet before going all in has plugged a big leak for me. Getting a decent work station surrounded by poker information happening I think would improve my game at least slightly as well (as apposed to playing on my laptop, on my bed in front of my big TV)
Thank you again for your replies, and please don't hesitate to point out where I am being unrealistic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 23 Aug 2006, 3:39pm Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 236 WPP: 95
Location: in a van by the river
|
|
|
|
|