Poker Forum

Subscribe to FTR Online Poker Community Web Feed

  >    > 

who says micro limits cant be beat?

  
Page 1 of 1  ||  Post new topic  |  Post reply

Author Message
stevedonel
Post Posted: Mon, 27 Sep 2004, 6:53pm    Post subject: who says micro limits cant be beat? Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 617
WPP: 257
Location: Vegas
My $5 SnG games have been on a major skid lately, causing my BR to go from 170 to 13 Shocked in the past two weeks. (happy I withdrew that $200 first) So I decided to hit the micros and do a little bottom-feeding.

Stats:
Hands: 136
VP$IP: 32%
W$WSF: 27%
BB/100 hands: 29
Went to SD: 40%
Won $ @ SD: 59%
PFR: 4.4%

Aggression Rating: .64 (overall)



You will of course see this kind of thing once in a while, but I just told him "nh". You gotta build up that notion of "any two cards will do", and just take the $ back later. Fnord,I hope this wasnt one of you followers. All in all, a fun and slightly profitable time.


CARDSON
*********** # 2 **************
PokerStars Game #725597913: Hold'em Limit ($0.02/$0.04) - 2004/09/27 - 20:56:06 (ET)
Table 'Iapetus' Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: analytical55 ($0.33 in chips)
Seat 3: Serene ($0.96 in chips)
Seat 5: YouAndMe2 ($0.54 in chips)
Seat 6: no t-bone ($0.26 in chips)
Seat 7: lashes2 ($0.22 in chips)
Seat 8: giglalad173 ($0.57 in chips)
Seat 9: dommia ($1.21 in chips)
Seat 10: RDU $teve ($1.36 in chips)
Serene: posts small blind $0.01
YouAndMe2: posts big blind $0.02
RDU $teve: posts big blind $0.02
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to RDU $teve [Ks Kh]
no t-bone: calls $0.02
lashes2: folds
giglalad173: folds
dommia: calls $0.02
RDU $teve: raises $0.02 to $0.04
analytical55: calls $0.04
Serene: folds
YouAndMe2: calls $0.02
no t-bone: calls $0.02
dommia: calls $0.02
*** FLOP *** [7h 2d 4h]
YouAndMe2: checks
no t-bone: checks
dommia: bets $0.02
RDU $teve: raises $0.02 to $0.04
analytical55: calls $0.04
YouAndMe2: calls $0.04
no t-bone: folds
dommia: calls $0.02
*** TURN *** [7h 2d 4h] [Js]
YouAndMe2: checks
dommia: bets $0.04
RDU $teve: raises $0.04 to $0.08
analytical55: calls $0.08
YouAndMe2: folds
dommia: raises $0.04 to $0.12
RDU $teve: calls $0.04
IceProphet joins the table at seat #4
analytical55: calls $0.04
*** RIVER *** [7h 2d 4h Js] [Qs]
dommia: bets $0.04
RDU $teve: calls $0.04
analytical55: calls $0.04
*** SHOW DOWN ***
dommia: shows [4d 7c] (two pair, Sevens and Fours)
RDU $teve: shows [Ks Kh] (a pair of Kings)
analytical55: mucks hand
dommia collected $0.85 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $0.85 | Rake $0
Board [7h 2d 4h Js Qs]
Seat 1: analytical55 (button) mucked [5c Jh] - a pair of Jacks
Seat 3: Serene (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: YouAndMe2 (big blind) folded on the Turn
Seat 6: no t-bone folded on the Flop
Seat 7: lashes2 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: giglalad173 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: dommia showed [4d 7c] and won ($0.85) with two pair, Sevens and Fours
Seat 10: RDU $teve showed [Ks Kh] and lost with a pair of Kings
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
stevedonel
Post Posted: Wed, 29 Sep 2004, 7:57am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 617
WPP: 257
Location: Vegas
Im looking for suggestions on what kind of numbers I should be shooting for. I keep hearing "less than 20% VP$IP, and more than 5% PFR %". As you can see, I worked on that a little; this may have helped with my win % (the last two stats), but we'll see in the long run. Dont worry about last nights BB/100, I took two bad beats in the middle of the session.

My party stats thus far
--------------------------Last night---------Overall
Game level-------------.50¢/$1-----------.50¢/$1
Total $ won-------------2.5----------------127.18
Hands Played-----------150---------------2741
Hours Played-----------2.52---------------48.3
BB/100 Hands----------1.6667------------4.6399
VP$IP-------------------20.6667-----------22.8019
PFR %-------------------5.333-------------3.8672
W @ SD %--------------61.54-------------57.438
WWSF %----------------27.2727----------26.7966


Here, I dont think I have to much to worry about; I do plan on bringing the VP$IP down some though. What kind of BB/100 should I be looking for in these; I've been thinking 10-15 sounds right.

PokerStars stats
--------------------------Last night---------Overall
Game level-------------.02/.04------------.02/.04
Total $ won-------------1.06---------------2.63
Hands Played-----------212----------------348
Hours Played-----------3.3833------------5.7333
BB/100 Hands----------12.5--------------18.8937
VP$IP-------------------27.8302-----------29.3103
PFR %-------------------6.6038------------5.7471
W @ SD %--------------55-----------------57.1429
WWSF %----------------20.2532-----------23.1343


PS Im still looking for a better way to export from PokerTracker and to post these numbers on here. any suggestions?


Last edited by stevedonel on Wed, 29 Sep 2004, 8:06am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Fnord
Post Posted: Wed, 29 Sep 2004, 8:04am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Royal Flush
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17157
WPP: 83
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
Over the long run... (you really need 100k hands to get a good read on your win rate.)

~0BB/100 - Keeping up with the rake
up to 1BB/100 - Winning player
1+BB/100 - Soundly beating the game
3+BB/100 - Crushing the game
5+BB/100 - Near perfect play

Your samples are too small for even VP$IP/PFR, you really needs at least 1k hands to level out. Even then some hot/cold cards can swing it a couple %.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
stevedonel
Post Posted: Wed, 29 Sep 2004, 8:17am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 617
WPP: 257
Location: Vegas
Fnord wrote:
Your samples are too small for even VP$IP/PFR, you really needs at least 1k hands to level out.


Are you saying I shouldnt even look at the numbers until after several thousand hands? How else can you judge your game from night to night, week to week then?

I dont want to go 3 weeks playing wrong but getting hot cards, then hit the inevitable cold streak while still playing wrong. I'm starting to think this is what happened with my run on the 3/6 game, where I was averaging almost 4BB/100 and then went crash-n-burn.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Fnord
Post Posted: Wed, 29 Sep 2004, 8:34am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Royal Flush
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17157
WPP: 83
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
SteveDonel wrote:
Are you saying I shouldnt even look at the numbers until after several thousand hands? How else can you judge your game from night to night, week to week then?


You can't. All you can do in the short term is study hands to see if you're making the best possible decisions.

After a thousand or so hands you should have a good idea of where you're at with VP$IP and PFR. After 20k or so you can begin to make educated guesses as to if you can beat the game.

There really isn't a "correct" VP$IP and PFR. The better of a player you are, the more hands you can play profitably. At some point you reach neutral EV and are just adding to your variance. Although, a pretty ABC TAggish player runs around 17%/8%. I've seen numbers from winning players reported between 12-25%/5-12%
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Buxx
Post Posted: Wed, 29 Sep 2004, 1:38pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
One Pair
One Pair

Joined: 23 Jul 2004
Posts: 19
WPP: 86

Fnord,

Don't you think this stuff is a tad distracting, I would think there would be a tendancy to concentrate more on your stats than winning money.

Oh, and statistics aside, I feel if you are unable to tell whether or not you can beat a game within a few hours of play in that game, you probably can't

Buxx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
stevedonel
Post Posted: Thu, 30 Sep 2004, 6:29am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 617
WPP: 257
Location: Vegas
Buxx wrote:
Fnord,

Don't you think this stuff is a tad distracting, I would think there would be a tendancy to concentrate more on your stats than winning money.

Oh, and statistics aside, I feel if you are unable to tell whether or not you can beat a game within a few hours of play in that game, you probably can't

Buxx


I agree, you need to be able to make adjustments along the way. Clearly the more hands the better, for figuring out where you're going wrong/right. I doubt it's possible to get to 100,000 hands playing incorrectly, without going broke.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Fnord
Post Posted: Sat, 02 Oct 2004, 7:30am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Royal Flush
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 17157
WPP: 83
Location: Walk the Walk, Flop the Flop.
Just to show you how silly a small sample size is....

From last night:

458 hands
15.72% VP$IP
7BB/100
9.17% PFR
AF:
Flop: 4.27
Turn: 16.5
River: 3.83
Overall: 5.64 (post-flop)

Must be something about early in the month...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT - 7 Hours

  >    > 

who says micro limits cant be beat?

  

Post new topic   Reply to topic

Log in
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    



 
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot rate topics in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by .  Forum style based on NoseBleed by mikelothar.com.   

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Party Poker  |   Doyles Room  |   Cake Poker  |   No Deposit Poker

Poker Strategy, Reviews, Bonus, Forum, News, & Tools Community
WARNING: Flopturnriver.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Flopturnriver.com is an independent directory and information service not affiliated with any casino. Links to third party websites on Flopturnriver.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.