| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Tue, 27 Sep 2005, 8:47am Post subject: MAC vs. WAC tuesday night showdown |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 466
WPP: 94
Location: Cincinnati
|
|
Toledo +13 (3-0) at Fresno State -13 (1-1)
If you have been watching the line in this game its jumping all over the place. Bruce Gradkowski is questionable at QB for Toledo. He IS this team. I graduated from Toledo and have gone to see him play many times. If he is out i dont see this game being close at all. Ive contacted some friends on campus and there is no word on if he is in tonight or not. Toledo is also banged up at RB(we have plenty of depth there though) and our all-star tight end Andrew Clarke is questionable. Toledo has beat the shit out of anyone its played this year, but thats the problem. It hasnt played a good team yet. Toledo is also MUCH better at home in the Glass Bowl then it is on the road. Fresno gave Oregon all they could handle in their only loss of the season. yes the same Oregon team that stayed with the best team in the nation for the first half last week.
If Bruce dosnt play I take Fresno and the Under. If he does im hitting the over. Ill try to wait until closer to game time. But if there is no anouncement 5-10 minutes before the game that usually means he is not playing.
Goood luck guys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 27 Sep 2005, 10:08am Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 105
WPP: 83
|
|
mmmmm....
Fresno is tough this year...If they can hang with a good Pac-10 team, they can probably hang with pretty much anyone in the country (Pac-1o bias showing?) I'll take the Bulldogs to cover 13. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 27 Sep 2005, 11:27am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Posts: 1112
WPP: 114
|
|
| I have to agree with doubledown on this one. Fresno State is alot tougher than they seem to be getting credit for. I'm not sure this one is even close. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 27 Sep 2005, 12:08pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 336
WPP: 136
Location: They were suited!
|
|
| Definitely Fresno, they can cover 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 27 Sep 2005, 12:48pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 466
WPP: 94
Location: Cincinnati
|
|
| Well i guess we are all on Fresno! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 27 Sep 2005, 4:37pm Post subject: |
|
|
Administrator
Joined: 04 Dec 2003
Posts: 1172
WPP: 136
|
|
That's enough for me, I placed this bet with Nine.com - the line moved at Bodog to 13.5. Thanks for the insights! (regardless of outcome)
Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 27 Sep 2005, 9:10pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 336
WPP: 136
Location: They were suited!
|
|
What a massacre.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 27 Sep 2005, 9:48pm Post subject: |
|
|
Administrator
Joined: 04 Dec 2003
Posts: 1742
WPP: 218
Location: on my laptop
|
|
| You guys were right, Fresno St kicked butt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 28 Sep 2005, 8:26am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 466
WPP: 94
Location: Cincinnati
|
|
| Nice hit everyone... Once i found out Gradkowski was out i jumped on the under too.. .so it was a good night for me |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 28 Sep 2005, 11:05am Post subject: |
|
|
Administrator
Joined: 04 Dec 2003
Posts: 1172
WPP: 136
|
|
| Excellent call, guys, thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
