| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Fri, 09 Sep 2005, 11:04am Post subject: What do you think is the most beatable form of poker? |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 27 Sep 2004
Posts: 2874 WPP: 161
|
|
What do you think is the most beatable form of poker? Qualifications: it has to be somewhat commonly played (games are easy to find) and by "beatable," I mean that a moderately skilled player employing a reasonable strategy can at least make a profit. In other words, what I'm interested in is the game you can make the most money at in the long term with only a modest amount of knowledge.
I do not believe this game is hold 'em. I love hold 'em, but variance can run high because how the game is constructed, and the talent level out there is too good to make the game easily beatable. Even though there are still a lot of bad players, there are more good players now than in any other type of poker, and even some of the bad ones can easily confuse you by simply playing unpredictably.
My own opinion from the limited time I've spent playing other games (compared to hundreds of hours playing hold 'em) is that Omaha 8 or better and stud 8 or better seem like the most beatable, especially at low and middle stakes (all I have played so far) where the talent level is dire. Any form of stud seems to have less variance in it than hold 'em, and the play is often really loose and really bad. Omaha 8 or better seems to be more prone to variance, but having a basic understanding of starting hands and what consitutes a good hand on the flop seems to be enough to come out ahead in most sessions. I actually just started playing this about two months ago, and I can only recall one session where I cashed out less than I bought in with (and that time, it was only -$3).
Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 09 Sep 2005, 9:39pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 1191 WPP: 56
|
|
NLHE
variance has nothing to do with being beatable
and in hold'em it's the hardest to draw out on someone OUT OF ANY FORM OF POKER because if the board pairs it pairs both for you and your opponent. In 7 card stud, if your opponent pairs and you don't it makes you sad. You could have a pair of aces in the hole and he could have a pair of deuces. Now he's ahead without having to hit a set like he does in hold'em.
Hold'em is the most beatable and therefore the most popular form of poker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 10 Sep 2005, 8:23pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 666 WPP: 95
Location: Decatur, IL
|
|
I tend to find more stud games with players that have absolutely no idea what they are doing more often than any other form of poker. Even at relatively large stakes there seem to be more bad players than good players. I think it is because people get good at hold-em and move up to mid/high stakes hold-em and then decide to try out stud and play at the same stakes that they do for hold-em without really knowing what they are doing at all. Because of this, I would say stud is the most beatable game, but I will say that two different times at 3/6 omaha tables, people have not known they could only use 2 of their hole cards, so it's possible to find some pretty good omaha games too  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 10 Sep 2005, 10:09pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 1191 WPP: 56
|
|
| Nehmer wrote: | | I tend to find more stud games with players that have absolutely no idea what they are doing more often than any other form of poker. Even at relatively large stakes there seem to be more bad players than good players. I think it is because people get good at hold-em and move up to mid/high stakes hold-em and then decide to try out stud and play at the same stakes that they do for hold-em without really knowing what they are doing at all. Because of this, I would say stud is the most beatable game, but I will say that two different times at 3/6 omaha tables, people have not known they could only use 2 of their hole cards, so it's possible to find some pretty good omaha games too :D | You forget the fact that NLHE players get a higher BB/100 even in tougher games.
For example, a buy-in to an MTT is worth 8x to a professional NLHE player and 2x to a professional 7stud player. So while a 7stud player can be making a thousand dollars on a thousand dollar buy-in, an NLHE player makes seven thousand. The nature of the game...
you could have pocket aces, and he can have a pair of kings and still be not-so behind. In hold'em he's 20% in 7stud he's what, 40%? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 11 Sep 2005, 12:16am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Posts: 346 WPP: 82
|
|
| At low stakes I'd have to go with Hi-Lo Stud as being the easiest to make money off. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 16 Sep 2005, 8:43am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 29 Apr 2004
Posts: 1918 WPP: 120
Location: St. Louis
|
|
| Quote: | | I tend to find more stud games with players that have absolutely no idea what they are doing more often than any other form of poker. Even at relatively large stakes there seem to be more bad players than good players. |
Very true. Not only are the players generally poor, but you only need minimal epxerience/knowledge to show a profit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 16 Sep 2005, 3:42pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 1720 WPP: 297
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
|
|
| With moderate knowledge being the key word, I think Razz is the most beatable. With one search on a quick starting hand guideline I completely destroyed a low / mid level razz game from my first day playing it on. I found tons of players that were absolutely clueless at the game, being insanely much worse at the game than I was after 1 hour of experience and the basic guideline to only play hands where your first 3 cards are 8 or lower. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 16 Sep 2005, 4:02pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 480 WPP: 113
Location: Manhattan & Boston
|
|
| Omaha hi/low mid stakes. Most of the time its hold-em players who stray away from hold-em tables because they want something new... and think two pair is the nuts... I'm yet to have a losing session in omaha hi/low |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 25 Sep 2005, 9:59pm Post subject: |
|
|
Strike 3

Joined: 10 Apr 2005
Posts: 1529 WPP: 75
Location: Canadian LOLUH'S AND AMERICAN LOLUHS
|
|
I like stud live but dont care for it onlien for osme reason.
NLHE both ways on the board. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 27 Sep 2005, 10:06am Post subject: |
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 16 Apr 2005
Posts: 50 WPP: 164
|
|
7 stud 8/b... by a mile. At the lower limits most people do not even know the rules never mind what constitutes a good starting hand.
Say bye bye to only making one big bet an hour; stud 8/b is nothing short of a goldmine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 29 Sep 2005, 11:15am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 370 WPP: 79
Location: Athens, GA
|
|
| michael1123 wrote: | | With moderate knowledge being the key word, I think Razz is the most beatable. With one search on a quick starting hand guideline I completely destroyed a low / mid level razz game from my first day playing it on. I found tons of players that were absolutely clueless at the game, being insanely much worse at the game than I was after 1 hour of experience and the basic guideline to only play hands where your first 3 cards are 8 or lower. |
where you can you find good razz games online? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 30 Sep 2005, 12:55am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 1296 WPP: 54
|
|
| The_Bankroll wrote: | | michael1123 wrote: | | With moderate knowledge being the key word, I think Razz is the most beatable. With one search on a quick starting hand guideline I completely destroyed a low / mid level razz game from my first day playing it on. I found tons of players that were absolutely clueless at the game, being insanely much worse at the game than I was after 1 hour of experience and the basic guideline to only play hands where your first 3 cards are 8 or lower. |
where you can you find good razz games online? | Full Tilt poker, probably some more other sites too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 30 Sep 2005, 1:03am Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 16630 WPP: 84
Location: Blowing Zook off his hand with Seven Deuce
|
|
I tried the Full Tilt Razz game and wasn't impressed. Probably worth it if you're really good at the game or are patient enough to play it when the game is good.
Uncapped buy-in NLHE and Stud Hi/Lo no qualifier are the most notorious fish-killers.
The Paradice Pineapple game is a gold-mine if you have good LHE post-flop skills. The starting hands run closer in value, you'll catch more often so playing well post-flop is much more important and pounding is a good way to go stupid-broke. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 30 Sep 2005, 2:46am Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 21 May 2005
Posts: 548 WPP: 126
Location: Poland
|
|
Pot-limit 5 card Draw. Lots of donkeyz calling with shorts, drawing to straights and baby flushes (and still scared of boats when they hit), basically: suckers for a big raises (like in Holdem ). Unfortunately, fishes go bust very fast, almost everybody thinks that draw poker has more randomness than holdem but in fact this game is more stable, less variance and less bad beats (but if bad beat comes, it's often spectacular and it's easy to go on tilt when your pat A flush gets busted by miracle 3 card draw that filled up, cracking AA with QJ in holdem is NOTHING compared to draw poker bad beats). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 30 Sep 2005, 10:56am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 2473 WPP: 93
Location: Arlington, VA
|
|
| Vrax wrote: | Pot-limit 5 card Draw. Lots of donkeyz calling with shorts, drawing to straights and baby flushes (and still scared of boats when they hit), basically: suckers for a big raises (like in Holdem ). Unfortunately, fishes go bust very fast, almost everybody thinks that draw poker has more randomness than holdem but in fact this game is more stable, less variance and less bad beats (but if bad beat comes, it's often spectacular and it's easy to go on tilt when your pat A flush gets busted by miracle 3 card draw that filled up, cracking AA with QJ in holdem is NOTHING compared to draw poker bad beats). |
Where can you play pot limit 5 card draw? I used to play limit 5 card draw on Paradise Poker and thought it was very interesting a fun. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 30 Sep 2005, 5:53pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 21 May 2005
Posts: 548 WPP: 126
Location: Poland
|
|
for dsaxton:
Sportingbet and PokerRoom offer good old 5c draw. Enjoy
SB has pot limit .25/.50 and limit (various), PokerRoom has better choice in stakes.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 01 Oct 2005, 12:53am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 1296 WPP: 54
|
|
I sat in a $11 7CS sng earlier on party and won 1st. All i did was win a few monster pots and camp for good cards, then stole antes whenever the chance came (bringer has a 2 for a door card, a complete will steal it almost every time, even against bad fish)
I also check raised trips on 5th street one hand and it ended up 4-way capped betting, that gave me a massive chip lead. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 01 Oct 2005, 12:55am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 1296 WPP: 54
|
|
| I'm also reading up on 7CS because after bootcamp, i'll be in California for 7 months or so, and the casinos/cardrooms all play 7CS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Oct 2005, 1:05pm Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 04 Apr 2005
Posts: 187 WPP: 669
|
|
Hmmm...What about small-stakes PLOH.
It's loosy-goosey bullshit poker with embarrassingly bad play, and all you have to do to be a profitable player is read a bit and not be mentally reatarded. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Oct 2005, 2:13pm Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 11 Jul 2004
Posts: 180 WPP: 70
Location: Tijuana Donkey Show
|
|
| Whatever form of poker besides NLHE ESPN airs a new episode of on a Tuesday night. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Oct 2005, 9:18pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 1296 WPP: 54
|
|
| cartilago77 wrote: | | Whatever form of poker besides NLHE ESPN airs a new episode of on a Tuesday night. | thats the truth, i've had total fish in my local homegame suggest we play omaha and 7stud lol, and i KNOW they dont have a clue about it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|