| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Aug 2004, 9:34am Post subject: Omaha - The Pointless Poker Game |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 3280 WPP: 120
|
|
As you might have noticed from the title of this topic, I hate Omaha/Omaha Hi/Lo with a passion.
The way I see this game is that it is 95% luck and 5% skill. I find it ridiculous.
Example. If you are playing Limit Omaha Hi and 2 of your 4 cards are aces, and you raise the pot up and get several callers. If the flop then comes something like K 5 5 you are most PROBABLY up against a set of 5s or possibly quads, or possible even kings over 5s.
That is why I think this game is ridiculous, and that you could just call with any old hand preflop and then you rely on luck, every time.
That's all Omaha is, luck.
Does anyone else agree with this? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Aug 2004, 10:03am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 1887 WPP: 103
Location: Kansas City
|
|
I do not agree even 1% Omaha is a different beast than holdem. But both require skill and luck.
In Holdem, you can get a very good judge on your hole cards. In Omaha, you can also judge which hands are playable, but not in the same way. 1 pair doesn't mean as much. 2 pair does. 4 to a straight means a lot and if you can pull off either of those while being double suited (2 s & 2 s or whaterver) then all the better.
In holdem you want your good cards to stay good or get better. In Omaha isn't the same game, you want to play good card that have the possibility of getting a whole lot better. Just get your mind into an Omaha game and out of a Holdem game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Aug 2004, 4:24pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 1720 WPP: 297
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
|
|
| I think Omaha does involve more luck than Holdem, with more hole cards, meaning more draws and cards that weren't even a factor in your preflop decision possibly hitting. But obviously there's still skill in the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 09 Aug 2004, 12:27pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 1405 WPP: 94
Location: Carlsbad, CA
|
|
omaha is all about what hands you play and getting away from a flop that doesn't fit. and i find it much easier to know where i am relative to the other players.
if i have a2xx in my hand, and the board has a low, i have the nut low hand. it's just a matter of whether it'll get quartered.
if i have the nut straight, and the board pairs and i either get bet into or check raised, i'm very sure my str just got sunk by a boat.
what makes omaha so nice (especially limit) is that most players will chase way beyond what they should. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 10 Aug 2004, 9:46am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 3280 WPP: 120
|
|
Fishstick just made the point that is why i hate the game so much.
Some players will just chase and chase hands so they can make absolutely anything.
I disagree with Humphrind about saying that Omaha is no different to Holdem. You can never apply the same tactics used in Limit Holdem to Limit Omaha, you will just get outdrawn so many more times because so many more players will chase hands which makes the chances of an opponent hitting something so much higher.
I just see it as a Crazy Poker game where ANY hand can and WILL win. No-one can put anyone on a hand because there are so many different hands that player can have, there is little skill and a lot of luck in Omaha (ESPECIALLY in Omaha Hi/Lo). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 10 Aug 2004, 10:18am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 1405 WPP: 94
Location: Carlsbad, CA
|
|
| dwarfman1990 wrote: | Fishstick just made the point that is why i hate the game so much.
Some players will just chase and chase hands so they can make absolutely anything.
|
as fnord has said many times to a statement like this: CHA-CHING!
this is the great thing about limit omaha8. i was just reviewing hand histories and couldn't believe what people were chasing, and how far they went with the hands.
with 50 - 70% of players seeing each flop, and virtually no preflop raising, i'm in heaven. if people want to chase that flush when i have the nut str - i say go ahead! in the long run it benefits me.
| dwarfman1990 wrote: |
I disagree with Humphrind about saying that Omaha is no different to Holdem. You can never apply the same tactics used in Limit Holdem to Limit Omaha, you will just get outdrawn so many more times because so many more players will chase hands which makes the chances of an opponent hitting something so much higher.
|
remember your odds! the odds of your nut high hand holding up are better than dumbass hitting his draw. and once again on chasing: CHA-CHING!
| dwarfman1990 wrote: |
I just see it as a Crazy Poker game where ANY hand can and WILL win. No-one can put anyone on a hand because there are so many different hands that player can have, there is little skill and a lot of luck in Omaha (ESPECIALLY in Omaha Hi/Lo). |
this is just not true - i have the nut str and the board has not 3 suited or paired - i have the best hand. i hold A2xx and the board has a low (not counterfieting (sp?) my A2) - i have the nut lo.
i really think that the chasers get punished far worse in omaho hi/lo limit than in holdem limit.
give it a chance - omaha hi/lo limit, gooooooooooooooooood!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 10 Aug 2004, 10:30am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 3280 WPP: 120
|
|
I've played a few Mixed Games Tournaments on BugsysClub.
The game changes between Limit Holdem, Limit Omaha Hi/Lo and Limit 7 Card Stud every 10 minutes.
But the more I play Omaha Hi/Lo the more I come to hate it.
You very rarely win pots with 2 pair of 3 of a kind in Omaha, you need a QUALITY (full house and above) hand to be sure of winning a pot.
I find straights and flushes too seceptible (is that spelt right?) to be outdrawn in Omaha, I will even go as far as thinking that if you flop a straight you will win the pot just under 50% of the time.
Of course this could be biased because I seem to get outdrawn in Omaha ridiculously more than anyone else...ever.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 10 Aug 2004, 10:38am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 1405 WPP: 94
Location: Carlsbad, CA
|
|
| dwarfman1990 wrote: | You very rarely win pots with 2 pair of 3 of a kind in Omaha, you need a QUALITY (full house and above) hand to be sure of winning a pot.
|
3 of a kind is pretty weak in omaha, UNLESS you hold the pair (no pair on the board), AND it's top 3 of a kind, AND no reasonable straight possibility, AND no 3 suits on the board.
working with good starting hands and playing the flop well should cut down on getting outdrawn. or, if you do get outdrawn on the hi, you'll at least get the lo split. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 10 Aug 2004, 10:41am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 3280 WPP: 120
|
|
| fishstick wrote: | | working with good starting hands and playing the flop well should cut down on getting outdrawn. or, if you do get outdrawn on the hi, you'll at least get the lo split. |
Splitting a Lo is one of the worst things to happen in Omaha, that means you only get a quarter of the pot, which means you will have probably lost money or (if you are lucky) broke even. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 10 Aug 2004, 11:07am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 1405 WPP: 94
Location: Carlsbad, CA
|
|
| dwarfman1990 wrote: | | Splitting a Lo is one of the worst things to happen in Omaha, that means you only get a quarter of the pot, which means you will have probably lost money or (if you are lucky) broke even. |
correct, but when i say "splitting", i mean splitting the pot (hi and lo to two players). when the lo is divided between two players, that's "quartering" - which, is not ideal.
but once again, with so many chasers (i'm not kidding - 4-5 players typically seeing the river), quartering is at least usually break even. that's why if you are going for the lo, make sure it's the nut lo.
in my reading so far, a common theme with omaha hi/lo limit has been to not raise (only call) if all you have going for yourself is the nut lo hand. if you think about it, this does make sense since all you're doing is paying more rake.
however, if there's 7 players in the pot, and i think i'll get 4-5 callers, i will raise with the nut lo. in ~ 600 hands, i've only seen a lo divided between more than two players one time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 10 Aug 2004, 12:04pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 1887 WPP: 103
Location: Kansas City
|
|
| dwarfman1990 wrote: | | I disagree with Humphrind about saying that Omaha is no different to Holdem. | | Humphrind wrote: | | Omaha is a different beast than holdem... Omaha isn't the same game |
I'm sorry if my wording was a little vague. To clarify, I think Omaha is very different than holdem.
| dwarfman1990 wrote: | | You very rarely win pots with 2 pair of 3 of a kind in Omaha, you need a QUALITY (full house and above) hand to be sure of winning a pot. | I've said this in another post. I've heard that the average winning hand in holdem is 2 pair. I'd imagine that the average winning hand in Omaha is a straight or flush. You are essentially playing 9 card stud. There are a lot of options with so many cards. You just need to learn which hands you have the most options with.
Again, In Omaha, you want to chose hands that can easily give you a straight, flush, full house, etc. It's still about hand selection, but don't think holdem. A pair is not as strong.
| dwarfman1990 wrote: | | Splitting a Lo is one of the worst things to happen in Omaha, that means you only get a quarter of the pot, which means you will have probably lost money or (if you are lucky) broke even. |
Don't play a low hand. If you have , toss it. There are very little options on this hand except the low. The only real reading I have done on Omaha is a few articles on the internet. One of them strongly suggested against playing for half the pot. You will rarely get a profit from this and when you do (3 people in the pot) the money that you will take out will rarely equal the risk you put in by playing a 3 way pot. You will need to be very sure about your hand to get into these situations. In any hi / lo game it will be more difficult to get a +EV. If you and 1 other player and going for the pot, you have the high and he has the low, you will put into the pot exactly what you got out. 0 profit. If you can get the high and split the low you will get some profit and it is advantageous. If there is no low, you are in a good spot to win.
| fishstick wrote: | | in my reading so far, a common theme with omaha hi/lo limit has been to not raise (only call) if all you have going for yourself is the nut lo hand. if you think about it, this does make sense since all you're doing is paying more rake. |
Good point. There are 2 things to think about in this situation. It is smart to be just calling. But also read your opponent. If you sense any weakness, push. You know that at worst you will get back what you put in (minus the rake) but at best you can get him to fold by representing a better hand. Basically, if you sense weakness, you have everything to gain and very little to lose. But watch out for quartering. I HATE that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 10 Aug 2004, 12:07pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 312 WPP: 289
|
|
All this talk of quartering the pot brings up very good point about the value of a made high hand and some ideas about playing it.
Alot of the chasing in Hi-Lo is done by people with an A234 kind of combination. They're hoping for those other three low cards so they can take half the pot. Sometimes there are a couple of these guys in the pot and you can keep them calling raises all the way. Throw in a strong second best high hand, and you've got the making for a typical Omaha pot.
With a made high hand you have to raise to build the pot with the calls from the low hands. Ideal example, you hold 789T of and the flops makes your straigh with no flush draw (like 78J). Now you've got the nut straight, and only two cards to the low. Great chance to get as much money in the pot as possible. Often you'll get A2 to add a few raises in the hope he gets the low.
Its a no lose situation for you, provided your hand holds up. If a low comes, you split a nice pot. If it doesn't, you scoop a very nice pot.
Its because of the fact that its so profitable to take that high hand that I like the big target straight draws, like the one above, and hands where all of the cards are T or higher.
Also, you've got to be aware of the fact that your low hand players often will help you build the pot with a made low hand. Sometimes you'll mis-read this to think this guy is raising against you, when in reality he's raising with you. If you've got a strong hand, but not the nuts, consider those re-re-raises as potential low hand pot builders, and not competition for your high hand. |
Last edited by heatman on Tue, 10 Aug 2004, 12:14pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 10 Aug 2004, 12:10pm Post subject: |
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 16935 WPP: 83
Location: Raise Pre-flop, Check/Raise Flop
|
|
| heatman wrote: | With a made high hand you have to raise to build the pot with the calls from the low hands. Ideal example, you hold 789T of and the flops makes your straigh with no flush draw (like 78J). Now you've got the nut straight, and two cards to the low. Great chance to get as much money in the pot as possible. Often you'll get A2 to add a few raises in the hope he gets the low.
|
The problem with middle cards like T987 is if you flop your straight either low is out or there is a single card draw to it. In general middle cards in Omaha Hi/Lo are trash. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 10 Aug 2004, 12:17pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush

Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 312 WPP: 289
|
|
| Fnord wrote: | | heatman wrote: | With a made high hand you have to raise to build the pot with the calls from the low hands. Ideal example, you hold 789T of and the flops makes your straigh with no flush draw (like 78J). Now you've got the nut straight, and two cards to the low. Great chance to get as much money in the pot as possible. Often you'll get A2 to add a few raises in the hope he gets the low.
|
The problem with middle cards like T987 is if you flop your straight either low is out or there is a single card draw to it. In general middle cards in Omaha Hi/Lo are trash. |
Depends on what you are trying to do. You're not going to get many callers if you hold JQKA and the flop comes TQK. The low hands fold out. You need bait. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 10 Aug 2004, 12:35pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 1405 WPP: 94
Location: Carlsbad, CA
|
|
| Humphrind wrote: | Don't play a low hand. If you have , toss it. There are very little options on this hand except the low. The only real reading I have done on Omaha is a few articles on the internet. One of them strongly suggested against playing for half the pot. You will rarely get a profit from this and when you do (3 people in the pot) the money that you will take out will rarely equal the risk you put in by playing a 3 way pot. |
you know, this is probably makes sense with good players, but with the number of people seeing the flop, and staying through to the river (at least at the .5/$1 limit game on Party Poker), if i'm expecting at least 4 callers, i'll see the flop with A2xx (with one of the "x's" being a little card as counterfiet protection). i see so many people chasing lows with 43xx or even 23xx with no ace on the flop, granted you may not make a lot on the hand, but you're still taking out more than you put in. plus, if you hit the miracle flop, you may take the hi hand as well.
what's amazed me a few times: i'll have a hand like AA23 with one of the aces suited to the 2 or 3, hit my nut lo hand with a flush draw, miss my flush draw, and end up scooping the pot with pair of aces as the hi hand. the chasing is just that bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 11 Aug 2004, 8:40am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 3280 WPP: 120
|
|
| Humphrind wrote: | | dwarfman1990 wrote: | | I disagree with Humphrind about saying that Omaha is no different to Holdem. | | Humphrind wrote: | | Omaha is a different beast than holdem... Omaha isn't the same game |
I'm sorry if my wording was a little vague. To clarify, I think Omaha is very different than holdem. |
Sorry, I was a bit too tired to read yesterday!
In that case, I agree with Humphrind about saying that Omaha is different to Holdem. Lol  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 11 Aug 2004, 4:07pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 1720 WPP: 297
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
|
|
| Quote: | | I do not agree even 1% Omaha is a different beast than holdem. |
It was confusing. I read it the same way you did, Dwarfman. I thought he missed a "that" after 1%, instead of missing a period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 12 Aug 2004, 4:05am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 3280 WPP: 120
|
|
Moving away from all of this Omaha Hi/Lo quartering talk, time to talk about Omaha Hi.
This game is the game that I hate the MOST (the most!) out of the two. That is because it is so difficult to apply a strategy as to which hands to play and which hands not to play.
Example. If you play a hand with two aces in it, you will end up losing to a straight/flush/full house or better (Note I said you WILL end up losing to a better hand).
That is why (and I'm sure you will disagree) I think that any hand is playable in Omaha high because with 4 cards to each player, anything can hit on the flop.
| fishstick wrote: | | CA-CHING! |
I think that there is absolutely no way you can make money from players chasing hands in Omaha Hi. Simply because, so many people do chase hands and probably if you haven't been outdrawn by the river, there will probably be around 3 players still chasing flush draws or straight draws and this could probably mean that more than half the deck are cards that you will lose with.
Possibly I will agree that in the long run you can make money from players chasing hands in Omaha Hi/Lo, but never could you do that in Omaha Hi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 12 Aug 2004, 8:00am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 20 Apr 2004
Posts: 725 WPP: 278
|
|
| i really like omaha hi pot limit, i played a tourney a few nights ago with around 275 players, and was able to come in 20th i beleive very good for my first time, audi also played for first time and came in 30th or so, it was a really fun experience and a nice change, and in pot limit starting hands are everything! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 12 Aug 2004, 8:43am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 1405 WPP: 94
Location: Carlsbad, CA
|
|
| dwarfman1990 wrote: | | fishstick wrote: | | CA-CHING! |
I think that there is absolutely no way you can make money from players chasing hands in Omaha Hi. Simply because, so many people do chase hands and probably if you haven't been outdrawn by the river, there will probably be around 3 players still chasing flush draws or straight draws and this could probably mean that more than half the deck are cards that you will lose with. |
on the turn, i have the nut straight with two of a suit out (and no pairs on the board), and 3 players are drawing to a flush. i put out a pot sized bet (ruining their pot-odds).
this is no different than hold em - if you bet to ruin someone's pot odds on their draw, and they continue drawing, they are making a mistake. you are still the favorite to win the hand, and in the "one long poker session", by pushing them to make a mistake, you will profit.
say it with me, dwarfman, omaha goooooooooooood!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 12 Aug 2004, 9:54am Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 1887 WPP: 103
Location: Kansas City
|
|
Well put Fishy.
This is all gold. Are we getting through to you Dwarfman? |
|
|
|
|
|
|