| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Thu, 30 Jun 2005, 4:09pm Post subject: 15/30 |
|
|
Where's the AI button!?
Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 4546
WPP: 87
Location: TagFish
|
|
I've already started it but here are my 5/10 6 max numbers. Either two or three tabling.
9812 Hands
23.41 VPIP
FSB to Steal 75.31
FBB to Steal 53.87
Att to Steal 30.17
WSD 38.28
W$SD 51.32
PFR 14.96
2.33 BB/100
Aggression:
F: 2.49
T: 2.26
R: 2.02
Overall: 2.32
True Win Rate: 4.74 BB/hour.
Rake: $1851. Rakeback is 25% so $460. Add another $9/hour for this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 30 Jun 2005, 4:18pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3539
WPP: 96
Location: Your place or my place
|
|
| 5/10 6max, why is this titled "15/30" ? :] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 30 Jun 2005, 4:54pm Post subject: |
|
|
Where's the AI button!?
Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 4546
WPP: 87
Location: TagFish
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 30 Jun 2005, 5:10pm Post subject: |
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3539
WPP: 96
Location: Your place or my place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 30 Jun 2005, 5:17pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 1277
WPP: 105
Location: Drowning in prosperity
|
|
We're in the same ballpark. You are slightly looser and more aggressive than me, but about the same winrate (2.28 for me).
I've moved up to 10/20 6max for the moment. Tough sledding so far (0.66BB/100 through 5K hands). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 30 Jun 2005, 5:25pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 666
WPP: 95
Location: Decatur, IL
|
|
| koolmoe wrote: | | We're in the same ballpark. You are slightly looser and more aggressive than me, but about the same winrate (2.28 for me). |
Dang, I must be a LAgg now that I moved up to 6-max. I was borderline rock at full ring, but my 6-max VPIP and PFR are both significantly higher than Jeffs which apparently are higher than yours. Kinda wierd that my style would change so much just by switching to a different number of players at the table. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 30 Jun 2005, 5:41pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 1277
WPP: 105
Location: Drowning in prosperity
|
|
| Nehmer wrote: | | Dang, I must be a LAgg now that I moved up to 6-max. I was borderline rock at full ring, but my 6-max VPIP and PFR are both significantly higher than Jeffs which apparently are higher than yours. Kinda wierd that my style would change so much just by switching to a different number of players at the table. |
There are lots of styles that work, but Rakeback dictates that tighter play is preferrable in 6-max. There is a wide range of hands that are either slightly +EV or slightly -EV given the situation. I'd rather not play those hands and avoid contributing to the rake since I make more in Rakeback on hands I don't contribute to. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 01 Jul 2005, 12:42pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flush
Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 416
WPP: 142
Location: golf course
|
|
| Nehmer wrote: | | koolmoe wrote: | | We're in the same ballpark. You are slightly looser and more aggressive than me, but about the same winrate (2.28 for me). |
Dang, I must be a LAgg now that I moved up to 6-max. I was borderline rock at full ring, but my 6-max VPIP and PFR are both significantly higher than Jeffs which apparently are higher than yours. Kinda wierd that my style would change so much just by switching to a different number of players at the table. |
Hi folks
One thing to keep in mind about 6 max, is that IMO being a Lagg does not work in the long term.
One of the key principles of being able to be agressive and still be +EV is that you are only playing premium hands.
I see players loosen up at 6max to 22-30% and still try to play the hands just as aggressively as they did at 8% to 11% 10handed. When you think about it, this can't work. It's an incompatable way to approach the game. You are playing a broader range of hands, so your aggression level needs to come down or you will be spewing chips.
IMO the best players in 6 max are semi-loose (let's say 23 to 29%) and with agression levels that are mid-range between agressive and passive.
So, there is nothing too wrong with being SLAP (semi-loose agressive passive), but being a LAGG is going to be dificult to pull off long-term.
Now....back to golfing...... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 01 Jul 2005, 3:03pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full House
Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 666
WPP: 95
Location: Decatur, IL
|
|
| ArcticKnight wrote: | | Nehmer wrote: | | koolmoe wrote: | | We're in the same ballpark. You are slightly looser and more aggressive than me, but about the same winrate (2.28 for me). |
Dang, I must be a LAgg now that I moved up to 6-max. I was borderline rock at full ring, but my 6-max VPIP and PFR are both significantly higher than Jeffs which apparently are higher than yours. Kinda wierd that my style would change so much just by switching to a different number of players at the table. |
Hi folks
One thing to keep in mind about 6 max, is that IMO being a Lagg does not work in the long term.
One of the key principles of being able to be agressive and still be +EV is that you are only playing premium hands.
I see players loosen up at 6max to 22-30% and still try to play the hands just as aggressively as they did at 8% to 11% 10handed. When you think about it, this can't work. It's an incompatable way to approach the game. You are playing a broader range of hands, so your aggression level needs to come down or you will be spewing chips.
IMO the best players in 6 max are semi-loose (let's say 23 to 29%) and with agression levels that are mid-range between agressive and passive.
So, there is nothing too wrong with being SLAP (semi-loose agressive passive), but being a LAGG is going to be dificult to pull off long-term.
Now....back to golfing...... |
Well, thanks for the advice. Right now being a LAgg is resulting in the best poker and win rate I have ever sustained for this many hands, so I'm not changing anything, but when variance does inevitably kick in(I know I can't win 8BB/100 forever), I'll probably take the advice and tighten up a bit  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
