| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Sat, 01 Apr 2006, 8:01pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 121 WPP: 132
|
|
^^^^ real nice pot there.
the 66 hand i might do every once in awhile, but i find it just gets you into more trouble then its worth.
the only time ill make a play like this, is if i see a bunch of loose players limping and im in the CO or on the button. that way you might take down 5 or 6 bb's with no contest.
i would never try this against a tight player tho. you have no idea where you're at on the flop.
are you running PT with pokerace ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 01 Apr 2006, 8:06pm Post subject:
|
|
|
HABITUAL LINE-STEPPER

Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 5718 WPP: 72
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 02 Apr 2006, 11:28am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 3659 WPP: 76
Location: over there
|
|
| Renton wrote: | | Warpe wrote: | | homeboy604 wrote: | | why are you raising 66 like this here? |
...then not raising your set on the flop? |
Homeboy: Why not? 50% of the time this takes down the pot. Of the other 50% of the time, I take this down on the flop mostly. Do you never make plays like this? I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Warpe: Would you honestly feel a need to defend top set on a flop like this?
I don't think I played this hand incorrectly. Please tell me if I am wrong here, because I probably am (otherwise I wouldn't post the hand). |
About the 66 hand, like Warpe said, don't be raising 66 preflop. And if you do, raise the flop. Not because you want to defend your set (though thats good too) but because the opp is putting you on an overpair here, he has a good hand he wants to be raised. So oblige him and disguise your hand.
Btw set over set is a beat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 02 Apr 2006, 5:45pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 858 WPP: 77
Location: Your loosing, lolololololololololol
|
|
| I agree with Renton here. I think raising lower pocket pairs sometimes is good. Depends on the table texture of course--I wouldn't do it at a table full of maniac laggs, but at a table full of weak tighties it's definitely +EV. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 02 Apr 2006, 8:04pm Post subject:
|
|
|
midstakes donk

Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 2979 WPP: 43
Location: flattin ur 4bets, makin u tilt
|
|
Renton:
The biggest change I have made over the past six months is to never slowplay less than top boat.
I raise the shit out of every two pair+ hand that I hit. To make this less transparent and make much more money I also raise teh shit out of every nut flush draw, combo draw, and straight draw (OE or gutshot) that includes overs when I don't believe opponent has more than top pair. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 02 Apr 2006, 8:25pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 2759 WPP: 83
|
|
An example of how I reason about stuff like this:
Say you have 67s and your flush falls on the flop. At this point everyone, even the ones that hit something nice, will be like "would someone have the flush?.." It depends a bit on expectations of how my opponents will play, the actual flop cards etc, but generally I will slowplay this on the flop. So either just check (call any low raise) or throw a ridiculously low sum that'll fold no-one to build the pot a little bit.
The downside is that someone holding an overcard to my suit can get a higher flush. He only has 16% that this will happen though. The upsides are twofold. First, if I bet heavy on the turn, people will start to think most of all how the turn card will have improved my hand. Second, if nothing had anything satisfactory on the flop, I'm kinda hoping someone got an improvement on their hand by the turn card that they are willing to put some money on the line for, so call (or even reraise!) my raises. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Apr 2006, 5:20am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 173 WPP: 83
Location: Ewa Beach
|
|
| Renton wrote: | ***** Hand History for Game 3866663489 *****
$100 NL Texas Hold'em - Saturday, April 01, 14:54:23 ET 2006
Table Irish Luck (Real Money)
Seat 7 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 2: chuckincharg ( $100 )
Seat 3: yankee1010 ( $127.49 )
Seat 4: skrub2tm ( $334.41 )
Seat 5: SandM14 ( $47.89 )
Seat 6: crow_milo9 ( $46.45 )
Seat 8: RyRy713 ( $132.24 )
Seat 9: kirbsterAA ( $233.79 )
Seat 10: PhillyHoops ( $37.88 )
Seat 7: Renton555 ( $109.20 )
Seat 1: bandit100 ( $101.35 )
RyRy713 posts small blind [$0.50].
kirbsterAA posts big blind [$1].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Renton555 [ 6h 6s ]
>You have options at Jackhammer (No DP) Table!.
PhillyHoops folds.
bandit100 folds.
chuckincharg calls [$1].
yankee1010 calls [$1].
skrub2tm folds.
SandM14 folds.
crow_milo9 calls [$1].
>You have options at Table 96041 Table!.
Renton555 raises [$7].
RyRy713 folds.
>You have options at Table 96535 Table!.
kirbsterAA calls [$6].
chuckincharg folds.
yankee1010 folds.
crow_milo9 folds.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 3h, 6c, 5d ]
kirbsterAA bets [$8].
Renton555 calls [$8].
** Dealing Turn ** [ 9c ]
kirbsterAA bets [$5].
Renton555 raises [$15].
>You have options at Jackhammer (No DP) Table!.
kirbsterAA raises [$25].
>You have options at Table 96535 Table!.
Renton555 is all-In.
kirbsterAA calls [$64.20].
** Dealing River ** [ 4c ]
kirbsterAA shows [ 9s, 9d ] three of a kind, nines.
Renton555 doesn't show [ 6h, 6s ] three of a kind, sixes.
kirbsterAA wins $218.90 from the main pot with three of a kind, nines. |
This hand I would've pushed-all in on the flop. Your set is too delicate on a straight board like this. I would take my chances on a donk call with a one card straight draw. You just calling on flop when the board is already cordinated like this gives your opponent to suck you out with one just one card. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Apr 2006, 10:31am Post subject:
|
|
|
HABITUAL LINE-STEPPER

Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 5718 WPP: 72
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
| Off5th wrote: | | This hand I would've pushed-all in on the flop. Your set is too delicate on a straight board like this. I would take my chances on a donk call with a one card straight draw. You just calling on flop when the board is already cordinated like this gives your opponent to suck you out with one just one card. |
That is the most results oriented answer ever. No offense, but you must not like money if you are willing to push your opponent off a marginal hand on the flop when you have top set.
Villain is not lag, and its a raised pot. I don't see villain calling 7xbb with any hand that has a 4 in it (except maybe 44). I knew that he was 22:1 to suck out on the turn, and I was willing to let him catch his 22:1 for a pot sized bet. He didn't get the implied odds he needed for the play, so in abstract reality, I didn't lose money here. I'd play this hand identically if it happened again, except maybe not raising preflop.
Can I get some back up here from someone to make sure I am not crazy? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Apr 2006, 10:59am Post subject:
|
|
|
midstakes donk

Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 2979 WPP: 43
Location: flattin ur 4bets, makin u tilt
|
|
You are crazy.
We have to fastplay this hand not because we think villain may have a 4, but because so many turn cards can kill our action. Getting money in while villain's hand still looks somewhat appealing is the most important issue.
What if the turn card had been a 2, 4, 7, 10, J, Q, K, or A?
How much money do you expect villain to really put in the pot then? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Apr 2006, 11:04am Post subject:
|
|
|
HABITUAL LINE-STEPPER

Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 5718 WPP: 72
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
| nutsinho wrote: | You are crazy.
We have to fastplay this hand not because we think villain may have a 4, but because so many turn cards can kill our action. Getting money in while villain's hand still looks somewhat appealing is the most important issue.
What if the turn card had been a 2, 4, 7, 10, J, Q, K, or A?
How much money do you expect villain to really put in the pot then? |
Ok reraising here maybe, I see your point. But why on earth would you push this flop? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Apr 2006, 11:09am Post subject:
|
|
|
midstakes donk

Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 2979 WPP: 43
Location: flattin ur 4bets, makin u tilt
|
|
Oh I definitely dont agree with a push.
I would reraise 3x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Apr 2006, 11:10am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 01 Sep 2005
Posts: 2186 WPP: 79
Location: donkaments weeeeeeeeeeee
|
|
| He calls 7BB OOP, so you might put him on a medium PP. Raise flop and hope for 99-JJ to not believe you have QQ+. Although calling and raising the turn isn't horrible IMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Apr 2006, 11:15am Post subject:
|
|
|
HABITUAL LINE-STEPPER

Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 5718 WPP: 72
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
| so in other words, this was a generally unprofitable hand for me in general. If I raised the flop he would have folded almost doubtlessly assuming he's half intelligent (I raised preflop and raised the flop, 99 can't be good here). I think I stood to win a small pot here until the 9 hit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Apr 2006, 11:28am Post subject:
|
|
|
OLD MAN RIVER

Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3687 WPP: 80
Location: Canuckistan
|
|
| Renton wrote: | | so in other words, this was a generally unprofitable hand for me in general. If I raised the flop he would have folded almost doubtlessly assuming he's half intelligent (I raised preflop and raised the flop, 99 can't be good here). I think I stood to win a small pot here until the 9 hit. |
Yeah, basically my point. To me, calling here is no different that limping AA - don't do it. You have the best hand so bet it and see how much villain likes his hand now. Pop it up to $24 and you take down $24 for your trouble. Made straight, flush, boat...different story, but a set's vulnerable so make 'em pay to beat you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Apr 2006, 6:31pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 883 WPP: 85
|
|
| Warpe wrote: | | but a set's vulnerable so make 'em pay to beat you. |
But we just established that the set isn't vulnerable to villian's range. He's got a two-outer, period.
We're just scared of cards that kill the action. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Apr 2006, 6:54pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 01 Nov 2005
Posts: 287 WPP: 107
Location: Seattle, Wa
|
|
I haven't read the entire thread Renton, just one thing that always helps me when I'm thinking like a donk - a short break. Just a couple days. Although my last break was a couple months. It helps. I know other players (jfish for example) do the same thing. Just a thought.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Apr 2006, 8:10pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 457 WPP: 181
Location: Philly, Pa
|
|
| I think you went all-in with KQ a bit prematurely. I don't always raise with AK, and if I am raised out of position I'll just call with AK. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Apr 2006, 9:37pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 173 WPP: 83
Location: Ewa Beach
|
|
| Renton wrote: | | Off5th wrote: | | This hand I would've pushed-all in on the flop. Your set is too delicate on a straight board like this. I would take my chances on a donk call with a one card straight draw. You just calling on flop when the board is already cordinated like this gives your opponent to suck you out with one just one card. |
That is the most results oriented answer ever. No offense, but you must not like money if you are willing to push your opponent off a marginal hand on the flop when you have top set.
Villain is not lag, and its a raised pot. I don't see villain calling 7xbb with any hand that has a 4 in it (except maybe 44). I knew that he was 22:1 to suck out on the turn, and I was willing to let him catch his 22:1 for a pot sized bet. He didn't get the implied odds he needed for the play, so in abstract reality, I didn't lose money here. I'd play this hand identically if it happened again, except maybe not raising preflop.
Can I get some back up here from someone to make sure I am not crazy? |
Sorry bout that Renton. I overlooked the fact he wasn't LAG. The only reason why I said to push here is because I've done in the past and it has worked out great for me in my case. I've always had someone call my all-in with their draws and missed, therefore I gain much profit from it. I would definitely reraise the flop 3x though. If he folds, he folds. At least you win a small pot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 04 Apr 2006, 1:59pm Post subject:
|
|
|
OLD MAN RIVER

Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3687 WPP: 80
Location: Canuckistan
|
|
| sejje wrote: | | Warpe wrote: | | but a set's vulnerable so make 'em pay to beat you. |
But we just established that the set isn't vulnerable to villian's range. He's got a two-outer, period. |
...so make him pay to chase it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 04 Apr 2006, 2:30pm Post subject:
|
|
|
HABITUAL LINE-STEPPER

Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 5718 WPP: 72
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
| I think its weak to make someone pay more than pot for a 22:1 draw. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 04 Apr 2006, 2:34pm Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7833 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
renton,
try to play your awesome hands faster and your one pair hands slower. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 04 Apr 2006, 5:03pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 261 WPP: 93
|
|
Look, some will disagree here, but I've made a lot of money playing 100 and your raises w/ marginal hands like AJ and KQ and crappy hands like A3 are just donk. I dont want to be wordy here, so here it is briefly.
These hands only win you small pots and cost you big ones.
I know that at the 25 dollar limit you get called by A7 and K 10 (even bigger donks), but that doesnt mean that you are playing good poker.
Now with that being said, you seem like a smart guy (you are trying to improve your game), so take the advice of most people on this board. Especially take the advice of the people that actually play 100 or 200 and are successful. Finally, take this advice. Aggressiveness post flop (and folding when pushed back) will KILL the 100 game. Aggressiveness preflop (without premium hands or the correct table texture) will get you killed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 04 Apr 2006, 5:33pm Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7833 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
| dpe8598 wrote: | Look, some will disagree here, but I've made a lot of money playing 100 and your raises w/ marginal hands like AJ and KQ and crappy hands like A3 are just donk. I dont want to be wordy here, so here it is briefly.
These hands only win you small pots and cost you big ones.
I know that at the 25 dollar limit you get called by A7 and K 10 (even bigger donks), but that doesnt mean that you are playing good poker.
Now with that being said, you seem like a smart guy (you are trying to improve your game), so take the advice of most people on this board. Especially take the advice of the people that actually play 100 or 200 and are successful. Finally, take this advice. Aggressiveness post flop (and folding when pushed back) will KILL the 100 game. Aggressiveness preflop (without premium hands or the correct table texture) will get you killed. |
aggressiveness preflop in position makes alot of money. raising AJ utg is bad, but raising T8s 7bb on the button behind a bunch of limpers is +EV on most tables. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 04 Apr 2006, 5:39pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 261 WPP: 93
|
|
Raising 10-8 or similar hands after a ton of limpers can be a +ev play. Personally, I think its an ideal hand to just call and be in a limped pot.
Either way, raising 10-8 late is much better than A-J early, that is unless there are only 1 or 2 in the pot, then I like to push a little.
Anyway, I still stick by my theory that you will take down way more uncontested pots post flop by throwing in a raise after calling or limping, than by c-betting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 04 Apr 2006, 5:46pm Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7833 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
heres a quote splashpots.com, a site created by one of the best players in the higher games on party.
"The Key to playing No Limit is to constantly be forcing your opponents into tough decisions, while keeping your decisions simple. Leave them enough rope.
The Button is like the door man of a night club, he decides if the limpers in front of him will get to see the flop or not.
You are on the button in a ten handed 10/20 NL game and are dealt 54s or A3s or T8, 4 players limp to you, and you make it $160.
The key to this move is that some of time you are going to have AA when you make this raise. When you do have AA, it is more likely you will get action then if you have never been raising in this position. However, even when your opponents do play with you, they still need to play passively because they are playing for all their chips if you do have AA: When you don't have AA, you aren't going to put your stack in the middle. So when someone calls with 22, their implied odds are actually horrific. You keep your opponents playing passively, afraid and guessing. By being the aggressor, you are in control of the hand. Every time you raise or bet or show strength your message to your opponents is that your hand is stronger then theirs, and this is intimidating because the plan truth is that when a players hand is stronger, they bet.
Your play from this point forward is not overly complicated, its actually quite simple. Your opponents have defined their hands up until this point as not being strong enough to warrant a raise.
If they reraise you, then it is fairly obvious that they slow-played a strong hand, you have no decision to make. You quickly fold. Next hand.
When you get called by the first person who limped your warning bells should be ringing. It is more likely that the first person who limped is now cold-calling with a big hand then if the second limper calls your raise. When a player is not the first limper, they are basically saying: My hand is not strong enough to raise with here. I want to see a Multi-way Flop. We do not want this to happen.
If a non-first limper calls you and you don't have a read on them as a tight player, they are most likely calling with a pair (most NL players are in love with a pair, the holy possibility of flopping a set) or he is calling with a hand like AJ or KQ which he will not play aggressively post-flop, how can he when you raised $160 representing a monster?
Depending on the flop, its usually a good idea to go ahead and fire again about half of the pot. You'll take it down a high percentage of the time for it to be profitable.
Think about the concept of what I have written and apply it to your game. But don'tover do it."
http://www.splashpots.com/oct23.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 04 Apr 2006, 5:55pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 261 WPP: 93
|
|
A good article that illustrates the value of raising in position. Also note that if someone calls his preflop raise and shows strength, he gets out. This is my point, in todays game, people think that a raise from position is a transparent play and dont respect you much post flop, but if you limp and fire out, they are putting you on a hand.
Long story short, a mixture of well timed preflop raises and saavy postflop play is the way to go. But don't raise w/ AJ and KQ OOP. LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 04 Apr 2006, 6:00pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 3659 WPP: 76
Location: over there
|
|
| Gabe, do you still do this at a table of calling stations? I'm thinking no, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 04 Apr 2006, 6:10pm Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7833 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
i think so, although i havent played full ring with 5+ calling stations in a while.
maybe i'll run an experiment tonight.
ilikeaces posted lots of hands about raising in position in the $100 and $200 games in a thread called 'aces rambling thread' or something like that. search for it, it might be helpful. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 04 Apr 2006, 6:59pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 04 Apr 2006, 9:17pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 25 Nov 2005
Posts: 169 WPP: 83
|
|
Fnord don't be so verbose.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|