| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 5:58pm Post subject: OPERATION: 600 in 60****COMPLETED IN 24 DAYS
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
I want to be playing 1/2 limit in a couple months, so I need a BR of 600 in 60 days. Thats my plan.
Right now I am building my BR and gaining lots of experience my Bonus whoring for jeff. In my first 477 hands, here are my stats:
VPIP: 21.89
PFR: 8.60
Agression -
oFlop: 2.59
oTurn:1.50
oRover: 1.71
Total: 1.96
Coldcalls: 0
Went to SD: 32.58
W$SD: 30.23
BB/100: -16.50 (ouch)
Total BB: -77 (ouuch)
Of course there must be leaks, but I do think I have not gotten the best of cards (it is not even 500 hands). I think I need to continue getting about the same numbers just with more wins at showdown and a positive BB/100. |
Last edited by gabe on Thu, 20 Jan 2005, 1:49am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 6:02pm Post subject: Re: OPERATION: 600 in 60
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 4836 WPP: 96
Location: TagFish
|
|
| Gabriel wrote: |
Went to SD: 32.58
W$SD: 30.23
BB/100: -16.50 (ouch)
Total BB: -77 (ouuch)
|
OUCH, those W$SD is horrible, you must either be getting some bad beats or showing down at the wrong times.
You are on a pretty bad swing here, but I'm sure you'll keep it up.
Good luck, you are taking your first step in improvement: setting goals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 6:10pm Post subject: Re: OPERATION: 600 in 60
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 3580 WPP: 80
Location: emo-kid
|
|
| Gabriel wrote: |
VPIP: 21.89
|
i hope you aren't playing full ring with a stat like that....
otherwise it just looks like you're on a bad run |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 6:15pm Post subject: Re: OPERATION: 600 in 60
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 4836 WPP: 96
Location: TagFish
|
|
| hypermegachi wrote: | | Gabriel wrote: |
VPIP: 21.89
|
i hope you aren't playing full ring with a stat like that....
otherwise it just looks like you're on a bad run |
Yeah, a little loosy goosy, but its only 500 hands. PT still has him autorated as Tight Aggressive though.
I did the math, If you could bring this down to 15% for the time being it would save you:
6.89% * 500 *.25 = $8.61, or 19 BB per 500 Hands.
Thats a big savings of almost 4 BB/100 if you could drop that VP$IP 6%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 7:11pm Post subject: Re: OPERATION: 600 in 60
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
| elipsesjeff wrote: | | You are on a pretty bad swing here, but I'm sure you'll keep it up. |
uh....isn't that a bad thing? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 7:25pm Post subject:
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 4836 WPP: 96
Location: TagFish
|
|
Yup
I'll stop spamming your operation now.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 7:40pm Post subject: Re: OPERATION: 600 in 60
|
|
|
Strike 3

Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 3289 WPP: 119
|
|
| elipsesjeff wrote: | | You are on a pretty bad swing here, but I'm sure you'll keep it up. |
Hahaha! Sounds like one of my Dad's pep talks in football (soccer) matches.
Oh and also, go Gabe! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 8:06pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95 WPP: 116
|
|
| Is 15% too low? I've been targeting 17-18%, but perhaps I'm not calibrated properly... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 8:19pm Post subject:
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 4836 WPP: 96
Location: TagFish
|
|
| Brodie wrote: | | Is 15% too low? I've been targeting 17-18%, but perhaps I'm not calibrated properly... |
Depends on how tight you want to play. I think to start off with 15% is good, and as you get better slowly add more hands in to increase it up to 17%.
Mine is around 17.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 8:22pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95 WPP: 116
|
|
Must get tighter, must get tighter.
I'm at ~16.5 for the last several days (500 hands or so), so I'm getting better. I'm trying to get my overall down from something horrible like 24%. I need a lot more hands of tight play to make up for how loose I was in the beginning (I love how PokerTraker can track your learning curve, too!). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 9:36pm Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
| i dont think mine is too high considering the limit. i get enough multiway pots where i think can call marginal hands. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 9:53pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 3580 WPP: 80
Location: emo-kid
|
|
| Gabriel wrote: | | i dont think mine is too high considering the limit. i get enough multiway pots where i think can call marginal hands. |
i think it's more important that you are winning before you start loosening up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 28 Dec 2004, 10:16pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
| hypermegachi wrote: |
i think it's more important that you are winning before you start loosening up |
edit: The more I play the tigher and more aggressive I seem to get. You learn more spots where hands like AQ are no good. |
Last edited by Fnord on Wed, 29 Dec 2004, 3:29am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 29 Dec 2004, 2:27am Post subject:
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 4836 WPP: 96
Location: TagFish
|
|
| Fnord wrote: |
The more I play the looser I seem to get. You learn more spots where hands like AQ are no good. |
And where a small pocket pair is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 29 Dec 2004, 3:42am Post subject:
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 4836 WPP: 96
Location: TagFish
|
|
Some hints for you to start tightening up more:
Stop playing Qxs. Dont play this hand unless all 10 players are in the flop and you are on the button. Still call if on SB though, as per usual. These suited hands will drain a lot of money out of you.
Stop playing your small PP (22-66) from Early Position, its still okay to call with them from MP though. Don't play these hands from LP if no one else is in the pot. If you are the CO or the button, you can try to blind steal, but otherwise fold. You want a lot of players to see the flop so when you actually do hit your set, you can build the pot up quite nicely. These are actually the easiest to play. Stop check/calling down to the river with these also in multiway pots. Chances are, if there is 1 bettor and 1 caller, one of them usually has a higher pair than you; it is not worth the extra bet, as the pot is usually small in this case.
Stop playing weak broadway cards like KTo from early position. I saw you raise with KTo from middle position, thats VERY aggressive, in a loose game, just call. KTo and QJo are very easily dominated and if you play these hands from EP and a person on your left raises you, theres a chance you are already dominated. You'll get a feel when you should play these hands the more you play them.
Make sure you connected cards are suited as well, before you play them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 30 Dec 2004, 3:03am Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
up to the minute stats! :
975 Hands
22.36 VPIP
amount won -5.08 (-10BB)
BB/100 = -1.04
WtoSD 33.81
W$@SD = 40.0
PFR = 9.44
Agg = 2.23
i made alot of my initial loss back, and i KNOW my post flop play is getting better. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 30 Dec 2004, 3:50am Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
| elipsesjeff wrote: |
Stop playing your small PP (22-66) from Early Position, its still okay to call with them from MP though.
|
In a good loose passive game 22-66 is an easy limp. In any game it's not much worse than break even. In a REALLY good loose passive game I'll start limping medium Axs. Similar thoughts with KTs, QTs, JTs...
| elipsesjeff wrote: |
Stop playing weak broadway cards like KTo from early position. I saw you raise with KTo from middle position, thats VERY aggressive, in a loose game, just call. |
KJo, QJo - Last 4 positions
KTo, QTo, JTo - CO/Button
Open raise or limp behind. Sometimes muck behind a tight raiser. Sometimes raise behind a really bad limper (particularly if the blinds are tight.)
I stopped playing pre-flop via a chart a long time ago... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 30 Dec 2004, 3:56am Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
| elipsesjeff wrote: |
Depends on how tight you want to play. I think to start off with 15% is good, and as you get better slowly add more hands in to increase it up to 17%.
|
It also depends on the table.
If some idiot is mashing raise at every chance pre-flop you need to tighten up overall. If it's a loose/passive limpfest then you can play a lot more hands getting a cheap flop and/or crap hands protecting your equity when a monster raises. If it's a tight table or tight with 1-2 live ones, you're actually playing an extra hand here and there from the last 4 positions in an effort to isolate/steal the blinds and/or bad players. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 31 Dec 2004, 3:54am Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
today i played alot and made some money (i'm in the black now!)
520 Hands
18.46 VPIP
Amount won $16 (32 BB)
5.13 BB/100
went to SD 43, W$SD, 48
PFR 11.35
2.31 Average Agg
F 2.21
T 3.16
R 1.84
numbers are improving and so are the results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 31 Dec 2004, 4:27am Post subject:
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 4836 WPP: 96
Location: TagFish
|
|
| Fnord wrote: |
I stopped playing pre-flop via a chart a long time ago... |
You've also been playing LHE for 9 months or so and know how to play a hand in every situation.
Gabe, on the other hand, has very little experience playing and starting out tight and working looser is a lot easier than starting looser and trying to cut out hands.
I'm trying to cut his VP$IP down, sometimes its difficult to tell at the microlimits which ones are the passive and which ones are the aggressive ones, even though they are all loose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 31 Dec 2004, 5:51am Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
| elipsesjeff wrote: |
Gabe, on the other hand, has very little experience playing and starting out tight and working looser is a lot easier than starting looser and trying to cut out hands. |
Yeah, I'm just saying it's more important to know why the charts are a given way and why good players make certain pre-flop decisions than to play by any chart after you've learned the basics of the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 4:20pm Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
My last 1000 hands:
VPIP: 19.3%
PFR: 9.9%
Amout lost: $1.19
BB/100: .24
Agression: 1.91 (not good enough!)
Went to showdown: 41%
Won at showdowm: 44%
eh, break even pretty much. I think I might be calling down when I know I am beat a little too often. |
Last edited by gabe on Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 8:27pm; edited 2 times in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 5:55pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 22 Sep 2004
Posts: 1102 WPP: 80
Location: Wastin' away again in margaritaville....
|
|
| Gabriel wrote: |
Went to showdown: 41
Won at showdowm: 44
|
huh?
- sed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 6:02pm Post subject:
|
|
|
LIVEBOON

Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 1837 WPP: 99
Location: Indiana
|
|
| i think he is saying he won 44 out of 85 and lost 41 out of 85. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 6:17pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 22 Sep 2004
Posts: 1102 WPP: 80
Location: Wastin' away again in margaritaville....
|
|
or his numbers were flipped and he's got an insane win rate at showdown
41/44 = 93% Wow....
going to showdown 85/1000 seems high to me...
- sed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 7:00pm Post subject:
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 4836 WPP: 96
Location: TagFish
|
|
Both of you are retards....especially Boondock.
Went to showdown is the percentage of how often you go to showdown if you see the flop. Won at showdown is the perentage you actually won at showdown when you do see a showdown.
It looks like you are taking too many hands to the river and showing them down and not giving them up when you are beat. You do that, and your W$SD will increase too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 7:18pm Post subject:
|
|
|
LIVEBOON

Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 1837 WPP: 99
Location: Indiana
|
|
| lol ha i guess I should read. I wasnt paying attention close enough and just figured thats what it was. Elipse if u dont know there is a sweet Empire reload comin around. dont forget this time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 7:20pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95 WPP: 116
|
|
| What's a good target for W$SD? With 2195 limit hands in my database I'm at 52.17. On track or too low? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 7:46pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 22 Sep 2004
Posts: 1102 WPP: 80
Location: Wastin' away again in margaritaville....
|
|
| elipsesjeff wrote: | | Both of you are retards....especially Boondock. |
Thats kinda harsh, jackass...
-sed  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 7:47pm Post subject:
|
|
|
LIVEBOON

Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 1837 WPP: 99
Location: Indiana
|
|
| lol trust me 99% of that retard was aimed at me if it makes you feel any better |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 7:52pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 22 Sep 2004
Posts: 1102 WPP: 80
Location: Wastin' away again in margaritaville....
|
|
Maybe if I'd ever used PT or there was a % in the text I might have figured it out... Or I'm just slow...
- sed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 7:59pm Post subject:
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 4836 WPP: 96
Location: TagFish
|
|
| Brodie wrote: | | What's a good target for W$SD? With 2195 limit hands in my database I'm at 52.17. On track or too low? |
Thats a pretty good W$SD. Mine is aroung 55% at 2/4.
for Went to SD you want around 33% or so. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 03 Jan 2005, 9:12pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 95 WPP: 116
|
|
I swear, I'm not lying:
Went to SD: 32.97%
Looks like I'm practicing what this forum preaches.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 06 Jan 2005, 3:06am Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
these are the stats from my first 1,837 hands that i have loaded into PT.
VPIP: 18.89
PFR: 9.53%
Amout lost: $1.59
BB/100: -.17
Agression: 2.01
Went to showdown: 40%
Won at showdowm: 42%
Lots of hands, but no real profit, which I don't think is bad if i am clearing a Bonus. The good news is PT has me default rated as an eagle now that I have my agression above 2, which I am still trying to get higher. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 06 Jan 2005, 4:01am Post subject:
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 4836 WPP: 96
Location: TagFish
|
|
As you keep getting that VPIP down, your other numbers will go up.
Your showdown %s are still low, but you're gettin better. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 08 Jan 2005, 5:59pm Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
| i'm up to .5/1 and have played about 250 hands of it so far. thats not really enough to post stats, but i have won almost 45bb already ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 09 Jan 2005, 9:01pm Post subject:
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 4836 WPP: 96
Location: TagFish
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 10 Jan 2005, 2:17am Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
these are the numbers from all my .5/1 games so far:
587 hands
vpip: 23
PFR: 13.63
Amount won: $109
BB/11: 18.57
Went to SD%: 47
Won $ at SD%: 51.22
Att to Steal Blinds: 31%
Steal Success:
Ww/oSD%: 69%
W$SD%: 50%
Agression:
F 3.5
T 2.5
R 1.65
Total: 2.58
the looseness i ascribe to some full games that went shorthanded when i was too lazy to change tables. i KNOW that is way too high for a full ring game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 13 Jan 2005, 2:09pm Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
finished clearing Bonus at tgc and i now have 1/3 of my goal completed. next stop is Bonus at InterPoker, here are my numbers in the first 271 hands of $1/2:
VPIP%: 17.67%
PFR%: 9.15%
WSD%: 40%
W$SD%: 53%
Agg: 3.88
Amount Lost: $7.25
BB/100: -1.14
Coldcalls: 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 16 Jan 2005, 2:43am Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
I am going to college tomorrow, which means a different computer, which means this data won't be kept up anymore. Here are my stats from 1/2 on InterPoker.
Hands 1196
VPIP: 22.58
PFR: 11.29
Agression
F: 4.75
T: 3.8
R: 2.6
Total: 3.74
Amount won: $118.50
bb/100: 4.95
Went to SD: 47%
Won $ at SD: 52.50
The high VPIP and the good showdowns numbers I think are because I had a really nice runof cards in the middle 500 hands or so. I am doing much better and I know I have improved significantly since I started this thread a little over two weeks ago. In terms of BR, I am about halfway to my goal in half the time expected. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 20 Jan 2005, 1:49am Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
| operation is finished! i just won a random $10 limit SNG to put me at $621 in 24 days. My goal was 60 days, which was far surpassed. I had been playing some 1/2 to clear some bonuses, so this won't be my first taste of it, but it feels better to have the BR for it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 20 Jan 2005, 2:41am Post subject:
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 4836 WPP: 96
Location: TagFish
|
|
| congrats, you keep going like this, you'll be playing 2/4 before hyper.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 12 Jun 2006, 8:57pm Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 12 Jun 2006, 9:02pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 2195 WPP: 52
Location: NZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 12 Jun 2006, 9:05pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 236 WPP: 95
Location: in a van by the river
|
|
| congragulations gabe given 5/10 a shot yet LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 May 2007, 12:07am Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
i love bumping this one
"i'm up to .5/1 and have played about 250 hands of it so far. thats not really enough to post stats, but i have won almost 45bb already !" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 May 2007, 12:15am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 02 May 2006
Posts: 4138 WPP: 63
Location: slow motion
|
|
quality bump.
how long did you play limit before switching over to NL? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 May 2007, 10:02am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 19 Sep 2006
Posts: 168 WPP: 109
Location: Denmark
|
|
This is brilliant
| Quote: | | The good news is PT has me default rated as an eagle now | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 May 2007, 10:04am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 19 Sep 2006
Posts: 168 WPP: 109
Location: Denmark
|
|
Btw make a new operation thread!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 04 May 2007, 1:01pm Post subject:
|
|
|
EAT BUGS

Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 7834 WPP: 52
Location: trying to live
|
|
| Bode-ist wrote: | quality bump.
how long did you play limit before switching over to NL? |
like 5 6 7 months, i dont. was playing tournaments for about 6 more before full switch to cash. i actually used to be pretty good at tournaments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|