| $5 or $10 BI |
| $5 |
|
73% |
[ 17 ] |
| $10 |
|
26% |
[ 6 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 23 |
|
 |
| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 9:45am Post subject: Official Noob HU Tournament Thread
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Oct 2008
Posts: 1436 WPP: 98
Location: Boxing Kirby's -> (@'.')@ @('.'@)
|
|
Notice: You MUST PM me the final hands of every match. I need the verification that each match was played. If you pull out of the tournament, please PM or post on here to let me know. Thanks and good luck all!
Matchups: Located at this link: http://www.bracketmaker.com/tmenu.cfm?tid=313065&tclass=
Tournament Dates are as follows:
All monies must be shipped to Muzzard (look below for stars sn) by Saturday, March 14th. I will also post matchups at this time.
Tournament will start on Sunday March 15th at 12am EST. All matchups must be played out by Wednesday at 12am EST(Tuesday night).
Rules and whatnot:
Number of Entrants: 16
(Lets just keep this one a 16 man to kick it off. If it goes pretty smoothly, and I think it will, we can try a 32 next, then 64, etc, etc.)
Buy in: $5
Brackets: Selected at random in the same fashion as the other tournament. (Players are given a # corresponding to the # they signed up to the tourney, and they will be plugged into random.org's generator. Example: I would be #1 next person would be #2, etc.)
Tournament Play:
-Play money HU 1/2 tables on Stars.
-200bb deep, no reload/auto-top feature obviously.
-Best of three matches. First person to lose their stack twice is knocked out.
-3 days to play your 3 matches. (Example: Scheduled to start Sunday you have until Tuesday at midnight (wednesday morning) to complete. Wednesday we get the results, reseed and you have from Thursday til Saturday to play next match, etc.)
Payouts: 50/30/20, 3rd place will be decided by the semifinal losers playing a best of 3 match. Winner obviously gets 3rd.
To sign up just put I'm in and I'll keep track of who is signed up on this original post.
Escrow:
PokerStars: Muzzard (poker_muzz is PokerStars name)
(Thanks for offering XTR)
Pretty much all we have to do is confirm who is definitely playing on the list below, if you want to play in this don't hesitate to sign up still because someone may not want to play, and decide to drop out. We have already had two people drop out, so don't hesitate to apply, theres a decent chance you can still get a spot.
We also have to decide on a date, but that can be negotiated later. Will have to be starting on or after the 15th, though.
Good luck everyone and hope to see you come out!
Signed up:
1.) dranger7070-shipped
2.) Outlaw-shipped
3.) kfaess-shipped
4.) Carroters-shipped
5.) Taicho-shipped
6.) mrhappy333-shipped
7.) Micro2Macro-shipped
8.) JR9477-shipped
9.) Illfavor -shipped
10.) amifat-shipped
11.) settecba-shipped
12.) Pig_Vomit-shipped
13.) BooG690-shipped
14.) iopq-shipped
15.) sil693-shipped
16.) Muzzard-shipped
*Bold text- you have confirmed you are playing. Regular text you have to confirm.
**Once you have shipped your $5 to muzzard, please post on here and I will put "dranger7070-shipped" so we know who is playing for sure, and who has paid.
Alternate(s):
3.) lockpull
4.) OhBollocks
5.) connectthesuitors
6.) flomo
7.) wilburforce
8.) Erpel |
Last edited by dranger7070 on Tue, 10 Mar 2009, 10:37pm; edited 31 times in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 9:52am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 567 WPP: 84
Location: Birmingham, UK
|
|
| in. 1/2 stars play money tables w 200bb, play 3 tables until someone is bust on two seems good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 10:35am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 899 WPP: 67
Location: Norman, OK
|
|
I am in. I'd say a $5 buy-in is a good number. I'm not sure if we'd get 32 entrants, and obv. 16 would facilitate a quicker beginning to the tournament. I agree that 1 week per match is too long. I think we could go Sun.-Tues. for a match, collect results and reseed/rematch up on Wed., go again on Thurs.- Sat, etc. With this format it would take ~2 weeks with 16 players and this could become a more frequent event so ppl wouldn't feel left out if they couldn't get in this time.
Prize split something like 55-30-15 percent or something? (obv 3/4 place players would play to settle who gets 3rd prize money)
I like the idea of the play money tables as well.
So 16 man, 2 week, 5$ imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 10:43am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 1611 WPP: 61
Location: Cheshire, UK
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 10:47am Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 09 Aug 2008
Posts: 68 WPP: 58
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 10:52am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 1611 WPP: 61
Location: Cheshire, UK
|
|
| Once BI has been agreed I'd be happy to be the escrow on stars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:05am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 29 Nov 2008
Posts: 778 WPP: 203
|
|
how about making it so that in a 16 man $5 tourney
round 1 winners get 2$ for the win
round 2 winners get 5$ for the win
round 3 winners get 10$ for the win
final winner gets 24$ for the win
so 1st gets $41
2nd gets $17
3/4 gets $7
5-8 gets 2$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:11am Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3

Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 5869 WPP: 52
|
|
I'm up for anything between $5 and $100
so I wouldn't be against $10 either
but $1 seems too low
Keith_MM: if you cash 5-8 you get less than what you bought in for? lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:22am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 29 Nov 2008
Posts: 778 WPP: 203
|
|
alternative could be 5$ for winners of each round and 10$ for winning the final.
i.e 1st gets $25
2nd get 15
3-4 get $10
5-8 get $5
this would mean all the round 1 winners would break even for the tournament and then just fighting for the cash. |
Last edited by Keith_MM on Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:24am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:23am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 567 WPP: 84
Location: Birmingham, UK
|
|
| Keith_MM wrote: | alternative could be 5$ for winners of each round and 10$ for winning the final.
i.e 1st gets $25
2nd get 15
3-4 get $10
4-8 get $5
this would mean all the round 1 winners would break even for the tournament and then just fighting for the cash. |
what is the point? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:27am Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3

Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 5869 WPP: 52
|
|
| how are we going to play play money heads up? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:31am Post subject: Re: Official Noob HU Tournament Thread
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 1892 WPP: 109
Location: surfing in a room
|
|
| dranger7070 wrote: |
Escrows:
PokerStars: Muzzard (although I would prefer someone who wasn't in tournament)
Full Tilt: ?
|
I could handle the Ft mobnies for u |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:43am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 567 WPP: 84
Location: Birmingham, UK
|
|
| iopq wrote: | | how are we going to play play money heads up? |
stars has 1/2 HU play money tables. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:46am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 1611 WPP: 61
Location: Cheshire, UK
|
|
| sil693 wrote: | | iopq wrote: | | how are we going to play play money heads up? |
stars has 1/2 HU play money tables. |
+1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:46am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 29 Nov 2008
Posts: 778 WPP: 203
|
|
| sil693 wrote: | | Keith_MM wrote: | alternative could be 5$ for winners of each round and 10$ for winning the final.
i.e 1st gets $25
2nd get 15
3-4 get $10
4-8 get $5
this would mean all the round 1 winners would break even for the tournament and then just fighting for the cash. |
what is the point? |
well considering that dranger put the following | Quote: | | Edit: Thanks to illfavor for a bunch of great suggestions. Keep them coming guys. |
So I thought I'd make some suggestions . This way at every stage of the tournament you are directly playing for prize money for winning the particular heads up match. With the 50/30/20 split everyone who cashs has to win 3 heads up matches.You might just as well have a 5$ buyin MTT and top 3 split the prize money. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:48am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Oct 2008
Posts: 1436 WPP: 98
Location: Boxing Kirby's -> (@'.')@ @('.'@)
|
|
| Keith_MM wrote: | alternative could be 5$ for winners of each round and 10$ for winning the final.
i.e 1st gets $25
2nd get 15
3-4 get $10
5-8 get $5
this would mean all the round 1 winners would break even for the tournament and then just fighting for the cash. |
Nah, I mean, its not a TERRIBLE idea but I'm playing a tournament to get 1st and I would feel cheated playing only to get $25 knowing that guys that got knocked out in the 2nd round are still getting moniez that should MINE .
With a 50/30/20 payout (assuming $5 BI) it would go $40/$24/$16 which is a lot more fair. Everyone gets a decent sum for making it as far as they did. We could even make it 40/25/15 to make it even lol.
And iopq, this is supposed to be a NOOB HU tournament lol, most of us can't afford $25+ BI's imo, although I do agree that $1 is too low. I like the sound of a $5 BI but $10 wouldn't be unreasonable.
Also, I read on the other HU tournament thread that they were going to play 1/2 HU with play money on PokerStars, so I naturally assumed that there were HU tables lol. My mistake. New system imo.
Suggestions? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:50am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 567 WPP: 84
Location: Birmingham, UK
|
|
| sil693 wrote: | | iopq wrote: | | how are we going to play play money heads up? |
stars has 1/2 HU play money tables. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:50am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Oct 2008
Posts: 1436 WPP: 98
Location: Boxing Kirby's -> (@'.')@ @('.'@)
|
|
| Ok, sil693 I just tried to open PokerStars and find the HU tables on for play money on stars, but failed epically apparently. Directions imo? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:52am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 1611 WPP: 61
Location: Cheshire, UK
|
|
| dranger7070 wrote: | | Ok, sil693 I just tried to open PokerStars and find the HU tables on for play money on stars, but failed epically apparently. Directions imo? |
holdem/playmoney/nolimit.
Filter 1 on 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:56am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Oct 2008
Posts: 1436 WPP: 98
Location: Boxing Kirby's -> (@'.')@ @('.'@)
|
|
Ah, yea I did all that Muzz, but I had to go into options and click "Show Play Money Tables" lol. God I suck at life. Thanks
200bb on 1/2 at PokerStars is a go at least.
Not sure about Full Tilt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 11:59am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 567 WPP: 84
Location: Birmingham, UK
|
|
stars all the way imo.
fwiw i have no problem w muzz being the escrow for stars even though he's in the tournament. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 12:00pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 1611 WPP: 61
Location: Cheshire, UK
|
|
| dranger7070 wrote: | Ah, yea I did all that Muzz, but I had to go into options and click "Show Play Money Tables" lol. God I suck at life. Thanks
200bb on 1/2 at PokerStars is a go at least.
Not sure about Full Tilt. |
Would be easier if everyone played on the same site. I'm not 100% that all players on the list have Stars, but I'm pretty sure that most of em do.
I think stars 200bb HU best out of 3 is goot. 50/30/20 is fine by me. Just got to agree on the buy-in now. I think $5 or $10 is goot, pref $10 but I understand some of the participants only haz small rolls. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 12:03pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Oct 2008
Posts: 1436 WPP: 98
Location: Boxing Kirby's -> (@'.')@ @('.'@)
|
|
Ok since it seems like all 3 of us (Muzz, me and sil lol) want to have it all on PokerStars i think thats how it should be set up. It just makes it easier, especially if someone that only has a FT account and a person that only has a PokerStars account get paired.
PokerStars only it is. I'll make proper edits.
Ill set up a poll for $5 or $10 BI if I can edit this post that way... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 12:11pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 29 Nov 2008
Posts: 778 WPP: 203
|
|
Dranger wrote | Quote: | And iopq, this is supposed to be a NOOB HU tournament lol, most of us can't afford $25+ BI's imo, although I do agree that $1 is too low. I like the sound of a $5 BI but $10 wouldn't be unreasonable.
| The NOOB bit is why I suggested it in that at least the noobs have a 50% chance of at least breaking even. Looking down the list of entrants there are some well established members taking part with decent bankrolls. My money would be on IOPQ winning it since he has a lot of HU experience or at least I seem to remember reading that . THe noobs taking on the better players will likely just be burning their buyin and if they have to get through 4 or 5 of the established players in order to cash its set up to pillage their small starting bankrolls. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 12:25pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 567 WPP: 84
Location: Birmingham, UK
|
|
| Keith_MM wrote: | Dranger wrote | Quote: | And iopq, this is supposed to be a NOOB HU tournament lol, most of us can't afford $25+ BI's imo, although I do agree that $1 is too low. I like the sound of a $5 BI but $10 wouldn't be unreasonable.
| The NOOB bit is why I suggested it in that at least the noobs have a 50% chance of at least breaking even. Looking down the list of entrants there are some well established members taking part with decent bankrolls. My money would be on IOPQ winning it since he has a lot of HU experience or at least I seem to remember reading that . THe noobs taking on the better players will likely just be burning their buyin and if they have to get through 4 or 5 of the established players in order to cash its set up to pillage their small starting bankrolls. |
you're not even listed as playing?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 12:26pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 1611 WPP: 61
Location: Cheshire, UK
|
|
| sil693 wrote: | | Keith_MM wrote: | Dranger wrote | Quote: | And iopq, this is supposed to be a NOOB HU tournament lol, most of us can't afford $25+ BI's imo, although I do agree that $1 is too low. I like the sound of a $5 BI but $10 wouldn't be unreasonable.
| The NOOB bit is why I suggested it in that at least the noobs have a 50% chance of at least breaking even. Looking down the list of entrants there are some well established members taking part with decent bankrolls. My money would be on IOPQ winning it since he has a lot of HU experience or at least I seem to remember reading that . THe noobs taking on the better players will likely just be burning their buyin and if they have to get through 4 or 5 of the established players in order to cash its set up to pillage their small starting bankrolls. |
you're not even listed as playing?? |
lolol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 12:35pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Oct 2008
Posts: 1436 WPP: 98
Location: Boxing Kirby's -> (@'.')@ @('.'@)
|
|
Keith, this isn't JUST for guys grinding 2nl/5nl lol. "Noob" refers to a wide range of players and the noob aspect of this tournament is for those who want to play a HU tournament, but DON'T want to play for the $100 BI that the other one had. So basically anyone can join, including griffey or badgers or someone who has a huge roll and is playing 1knl regularly. It just doesn't matter.
And if $5 is going to and I quote, "pillage their roll" I won't allow them to take place, I will take an alternate off the list to play in their spot because they are obviously not rolled for this tournament. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 12:58pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3

Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 5869 WPP: 52
|
|
I voted for $5 lol because I don't care that much either way, but I realize that other people will have a problem participating if it's $10
and yeah I had the hide play money tables turned on lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 1:01pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 15 Aug 2008
Posts: 218 WPP: 78
|
|
The setup sounds pretty good so far, thank you to those who are setting this up.
There are some highly respected players currently, but nowhere near as intimidating as the $100HU list. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 1:03pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 29 Nov 2008
Posts: 778 WPP: 203
|
|
| dranger7070 wrote: |
And if $5 is going to and I quote, "pillage their roll" I won't allow them to take place, I will take an alternate off the list to play in their spot because they are obviously not rolled for this tournament. |
so what if i'm not in this tournament it doesn't mean that I wouldnt be in any future tournaments , therefore I feel I have an equal input into ideas for it.
With regards to rolls my main concern is for xpaand who according to his sig has 30$ in his BR .When it was 1$-5$ buyin being suggested and noobs then he had every right to be in it when it was at the lower end of that range. Now the experienced players are in it and suggesting a higher buyin I don't think that its fair on him.he's registered an interest and he'll probably say that its fine as a learning experience but its not exactly promoting Bankroll Management and was the reason for my comment about pillageing their rolls. edit: checked ArcadianRocks banner and that says a 27$ bankroll |
Last edited by Keith_MM on Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 1:11pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 1:08pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3

Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 5869 WPP: 52
|
|
| well he's honestly under-rolled for 2NL :O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 1:13pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Oct 2008
Posts: 1436 WPP: 98
Location: Boxing Kirby's -> (@'.')@ @('.'@)
|
|
It will suck if xpaand isn't able to participate, but I'm not going to reformat an entire tournament for one player. This thread has only been open for a couple hours (if that) and more people will likely sign up as alternates. If I (or anyone else) feels that someone's roll is inadequate (as xpaands is) he will be taken off the list.
Its not like there wont' be another one ever. Besides, I think that this tournament will end up being a $5 BI one. In the future we can probably up the ante a little bit if some more players would like to, but for now I (and probly the majority of the others that will be participating) will want to keep it small just to see how it plays out. If its a $5 BI I have no problem allowing xpaand to play if he feels like risking that much of his roll on this, but if its $10 I will cut him. That simple imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 1:24pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 567 WPP: 84
Location: Birmingham, UK
|
|
| just make it $5 to cut all the BS imo. makes life easier. (i voted $10 so its not like i REALLY want it to be $5, but it will probably make things easier). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 1:27pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 1611 WPP: 61
Location: Cheshire, UK
|
|
| sil693 wrote: | | just make it $5 to cut all the BS imo. makes life easier. (i voted $10 so its not like i REALLY want it to be $5, but it will probably make things easier). |
This |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 1:33pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Oct 2008
Posts: 1436 WPP: 98
Location: Boxing Kirby's -> (@'.')@ @('.'@)
|
|
Rofl ok. Since Muzzard and sil seem to be the only ones who want to cut through the crap and get down to brass tacks, will do. $5 it is.
I'll go and edit. The only thing we SORT of have to decide on now is the payout structure, but I think we can just have 50/30/20 and call it good.
Sound good everyone? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 1:36pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 567 WPP: 84
Location: Birmingham, UK
|
|
50/30/20 yeah.
also, props to dranger for setting this up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 1:37pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 1611 WPP: 61
Location: Cheshire, UK
|
|
I agree with either payout structure:
55/35/10 or 50/30/20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 1:42pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Oct 2008
Posts: 1436 WPP: 98
Location: Boxing Kirby's -> (@'.')@ @('.'@)
|
|
| sil693 wrote: | 50/30/20 yeah.
also, props to dranger for setting this up. |
Well, Outlaw is the one who really got the ball rolling, I just decided to make all the lists and whatnot since he didn't seem to forthcoming about it, but thanks .
I figured I don't make my presence known on this site very often (I hang around my own blog too much ) and thought it would be fun to get out there and mix it up with some of you guys, and I've been wanting to play some HU lately anyways.
Also, pretty much the final version of the rules and stuff are posted now. Just gotta make sure that everyone on the list is gonna be willing to play. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 2:15pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 1611 WPP: 61
Location: Cheshire, UK
|
|
All we need now is the 16 players to say they agree to the terms and start shipping.
I agree! Monies shipped to myself. lildogz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 2:18pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 234 WPP: 102
|
|
| Damn I didn't have internet for a few days and I missed this! O well I guess I'm in as an alternate? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 2:30pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 07 Jan 2006
Posts: 1011 WPP: 103
Location: Hartford, CT
|
|
| I'm in too if you need another alternate. My money is Goot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 2:32pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Oct 2008
Posts: 1436 WPP: 98
Location: Boxing Kirby's -> (@'.')@ @('.'@)
|
|
| Can always use more alternates. Most of the people on the list aren't even locks as of now. They just stated in another thread that they would be interested. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 2:34pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 1611 WPP: 61
Location: Cheshire, UK
|
|
| dranger7070 wrote: | | Can always use more alternates. Most of the people on the list aren't even locks as of now. They just stated in another thread that they would be interested. |
i just PMed everyone on the list to sign up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 2:38pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3

Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 5869 WPP: 52
|
|
btw what time of day are we playing at and how are we going to contact the people
I mean are there going to be scheduling conflicts, are people going to sleep in and miss their arranged times, etc? I know I miss most of the FTR tourneys even though I want to play in all of them |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 2:45pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Oct 2008
Posts: 1436 WPP: 98
Location: Boxing Kirby's -> (@'.')@ @('.'@)
|
|
Um, once you get your opponent for that rounds bracket you guys can really play whenever you want within the 3 days you are alloted per round.
Although, for proof, I think the deciding (final) hands should be posted or PMed to me just so I don't hear that "o we never played, he never beat me," etc.
Its not a perfect system, but it should suffice. Once we set a date, and everyone's money has been shipped and confirmed by muzz ill set up the brackets then post on here to let everyone know then we kick it off. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 2:51pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 15 Aug 2008
Posts: 218 WPP: 78
|
|
At this point do we need to just confirm here, when should we begin shipping the buy-ins?
I'm in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 2:54pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Oct 2008
Posts: 1436 WPP: 98
Location: Boxing Kirby's -> (@'.')@ @('.'@)
|
|
| Yes I would like everyone that is on the list (the top 16 that is) to confirm whether or not they are in, and you can begin shipping the money whenever you like, I'm probly gonna hold off until I get back from spring break on sunday though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 3:00pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 477 WPP: 150
|
|
Thanks for holding my spot guys. I was working on my Operations post (shameless plug). I'm in there like swimwear. Pretty excited to part of this. Sorry I didn't post sooner but hold my spot.
So I understand Muzzard is the "escrow." I was never familiar with this term but I'm assuming that just means he holds the money and pays out properly. That sounds about fine. I guess I will be shipping the money when the dates are set. Is that OK? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 3:06pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 09 Jul 2008
Posts: 883 WPP: 135
Location: London, England.
|
|
*sigh* i'm reluctantly pulling out, it's the *disciplined* thing to do. I'm no where near rolled for $5 16 man HU tournements at the moment. I'll be there next time for sure. So one of the reserves can have my spot!
Good luck all! |
Last edited by LuckySlevin on Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 3:14pm; edited 2 times in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 08 Mar 2009, 3:11pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 1611 WPP: 61
Location: Cheshire, UK
|
|
| btw, when you do ship it is poker_muzz on stars (winsford) |
|
|
|
|
|
|