Note taking advice please (results included~relevant)

This was a good hand for my note taking . There are plenty of limpers,I take notes on limpers for exploitation. Its the BB that intrests me.

$0.02/$0.04 No Limit Holdem
Betfair
8 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Stacks:
Hero ($8.22)
UTG+1 ($2.20)
MP1 ($0.37)
MP2 ($1.04)
CO ($1.94)
BTN ($4.14)
SB ($3.18)
BB ($2.68)

Pre-Flop: ($0.06, 8 players) Hero is UTG King of Clubs

Hero folds, UTG+1 calls $0.04, MP1 calls $0.04, MP2 calls $0.04, CO folds, BTN folds, SB folds, BB checks

Flop: King of Diamonds

($0.18, 4 players)
BB checks, UTG+1 checks, MP1 checks, MP2 bets $0.04, BB raises to $0.27, UTG+1 calls $0.27, MP1 folds, MP2 calls $0.23

Turn: Nine of Clubs

($0.99, 3 players)
BB bets $1.20, UTG+1 calls $1.20, MP2 folds

River: Ace of Spades

($3.39, 2 players)
BB bets $1.17, UTG+1 calls $0.69

Final Pot: $5.25
BB shows
King of Spades

UTG+1 shows
Seven of Hearts

BB wins $5.02 (net +$2.34)

MP1 lost $0.04
MP2 lost $0.31
UTG+1 lost $2.20

here are my notes:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BB~capable of slowplaying KK.Checked with KK in the big blind. KQx flop. Check/raised to 7xbb .

UTG+1 ~ limped 97s,chased a bad draw, ignored a chk/rse

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If I had KK here ,I would have done a 4-8xBB preflop raise here. winning Just the $0.18 preflop pot.

But the way the BB played it. he extracted a lot more.Because UTG+1 played like an idiot.

Is my note taking accurate enough?
Is the BB play an advanced play?

id make a note that he overbets the turn as well with a nut type hand. other than that its what i would do

and no, the bb's play is just retarded.

haha JKDS I was just about to post that I don't think the BB was advanced at all and that the play was ra-tarded.

I think if a flush would have come on the river the guy would still be betting his stack away. Your note taking is on the money.

BB is a donk for limping KK and c/r'ing limped, drawy flop. That's a fine note.

UTG+1 weak bet/called flop with a draw. That's a worthy note because players like him often weak bet weak hands or draws.

I take notes on behavior that's out of the ordinary. If UTG+1 is like 50/2 then I expect him to play a draw like this so I wouldn't bother taking a note because it's redundant. The weakbet draw thing is probably the only thing worth noting because not all passive players weak-stab draws, sometimes they just check.

Likewise, I don't expect a really passive player to be raising KK so it's not all that noteworthy. I also espect passive players to be betting and raising very large with strength, so his postflop play is certainly typical of a passive fish.

The point is that it's hardly worth noting player's tendancies that perfect fit the standard mold of their play style as that's what you should be assuming of them anyways. Make notes when they do something out of the ordinary.

If you're not that confident in your stereotypes, I guess note-taking can be a good way to make those ideas really sink in...