The Texas Hold'em Strategy Guide and Online Poker Forum Community
Poker
TOOLS

Poker Forum

HOTRestricted FTR $200 Freeroll at FullTilt on November 23rd Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember Me         Forgot Password

  >    > 

Longterm ROI question

  
Page 1 of 1  ||  Post new topic  |  Post reply

Author Message
NLHE lahooozaher
Post Posted: Wed, 06 Dec 2006, 6:24pm    Post subject: Longterm ROI question Reply with quote
Full House
Full House

Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 916
WPP: 81

I found an article at 2p2 about turbos and ROIs that was really offsetting. It said that a really good ROI for turbos was 10-12%. It didn't mention a buyin for this, it was just in general. I don't play turbos but it seems to me that 10-12% is a very low ROI for an above average player at the $6+.50s. I am curious if you think that $6+.50s are beatable for 25%+ ROI and how high it could go at the $15+1s.
View user's profile Send private message
gingerwizard
Post Posted: Wed, 06 Dec 2006, 6:44pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 1597
WPP: 128

I believe 10-12% is good for $6.50s.

They are harder to beat because in turbos you have to play push/fold poker, and people call much wider ranges so that you get sucked out on much more.

I.e. say you push with the best hand and are called 3 times in a turbo. Say you made 3 great pushes these times and found yourself 70% to win all three times. P(you win all three) = .7*.7*.7 = 343/1000 ~= 1/3.

I.e. 66% of the times you make 3 great pushes you are OUT. That goes up to 75% after 4 and so on. Now factor in people calling your crap with Ax or T8o and all the times you find yourself up against a monster or in a coin flip, and its easy to imagine how lower level ROI's are harder to maintain in turbos.

Im really coming round to the idea of playing the slower games to allow for more skill. Still you are reading the ramblings of a currently losing player!!
View user's profile Send private message
drmcboy
Post Posted: Wed, 06 Dec 2006, 6:51pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 7971
WPP: 67

this is tough because good/lucky players running at 25% are going to move up before they get a decent sample.
View user's profile Send private message
Da GOAT
Post Posted: Wed, 06 Dec 2006, 7:02pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 4170
WPP: 77
Location: Dublin
i believe that, im 11.77% over 282 $16 turbos. ginger made some sense of it. thing with turbos is you can play more for more money per hour.

1 regular=maybe 2 turbos
View user's profile Send private message
MissKitty
Post Posted: Wed, 06 Dec 2006, 7:12pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
3-of-a-Kind
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 77
WPP: 175
Location: Arizona: PsStakes.com
I had the OP ask this question for me. I'm currently playing the 6's but have enough money to move on up to the 15's. I already have about 80 tournaments at the 15's and am in the red for about 100$. My question was basically if I move up to the 15's can I expect a semi decent ROI compared to my current ROI of 36% (Over 180 trnys)at the 6's or should I stay where I am until I can build a deeper roll and then take the shot?

Also I relize I'm probably running very well right now. So can I expect my ROI to drop drastically soon?

Thanks for the help,
Kitty
View user's profile Send private message
taipan168
Post Posted: Wed, 06 Dec 2006, 7:16pm    Post subject: Re: Longterm ROI question Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 9476
WPP: 127
Location: Sydney
NLHE lahooozaher wrote:
I found an article at 2p2 about turbos and ROIs that was really offsetting. It said that a really good ROI for turbos was 10-12%. It didn't mention a buyin for this, it was just in general. I don't play turbos but it seems to me that 10-12% is a very low ROI for an above average player at the $6+.50s. I am curious if you think that $6+.50s are beatable for 25%+ ROI and how high it could go at the $15+1s.

Few points:
- This assumes serious hardcore multitabling (like 8-16 tables at a time). Somebody did a calculation on 2+2 that said that multitabling to this extent reduces your ROI by about 6-8% compared to single tabling
- I would say that a sustainable ROI at the $6.50s is 20-25% over the long term if you're a good player and your single tabling. Closer to 20% if you multitable. Just be prepared for LOTS of variance at the $6.50s
- At the $16s, I'd say sustainable is around 15% as you get a lot of 2+2 multitablers because it's the best rake deal on the net.
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
drmcboy
Post Posted: Wed, 06 Dec 2006, 7:24pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 7971
WPP: 67

do you really care more about ROI than profit? Why?

Yes, move up.

Quote:
Just be prepared for LOTS of variance at the $6.50s


I assume you say this because people call with bad hands and draw out. Is there really any evidence that increases $$ variance ? Sure you lose more big pots, but you win more too. I think variance gets worse as you move up precisely because people STOP calling with bad hands and you are forced into playing more hands (flips, more open shoving with bad hands UTG, etc,etc).
View user's profile Send private message
WildBobAA
Post Posted: Wed, 06 Dec 2006, 7:56pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Season III
Season III

Joined: 20 Aug 2005
Posts: 1779
WPP: 124
Location: Winning 1 of 1 games
drmcboy wrote:
this is tough because good/lucky players running at 25% are going to move up before they get a decent sample.


This is a great point, one that doesn't get mentioned often.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address WordPress Blog
taipan168
Post Posted: Wed, 06 Dec 2006, 8:03pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 9476
WPP: 127
Location: Sydney
drmcboy wrote:
Quote:
Just be prepared for LOTS of variance at the $6.50s

I assume you say this because people call with bad hands and draw out. Is there really any evidence that increases $$ variance ? Sure you lose more big pots, but you win more too. I think variance gets worse as you move up precisely because people STOP calling with bad hands and you are forced into playing more hands (flips, more open shoving with bad hands UTG, etc,etc).

I've got no hard evidence of this. I guess it's just because it's harder to put people on hands preflop because they call your raises with all sorts of random hands so even if your AK hits TPTK on the flop, if you're up against 4 donkeys who might have all sorts of crazy draws/middle pair/bottom pair, the chance of it holding up is just that much lower. Sure, when you win you win many more chips but the chance of winning an all-in on the flop is lower:

Code:
Board: Kd 9c 8c
Dead: 

           equity (%)     win (%)   tie (%)
Hand  1:   33.6585 %     33.66%    00.00%      { AsKh }
Hand  2:   21.5854 %     21.59%    00.00%      { JhTh }
Hand  3:   05.7317 %     05.73%    00.00%      { Ad9s }
Hand  4:   39.0244 %     39.02%    00.00%      { Ac2c }
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
taipan168
Post Posted: Wed, 06 Dec 2006, 8:05pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 9476
WPP: 127
Location: Sydney
MissKitty wrote:
I had the OP ask this question for me. I'm currently playing the 6's but have enough money to move on up to the 15's. I already have about 80 tournaments at the 15's and am in the red for about 100$. My question was basically if I move up to the 15's can I expect a semi decent ROI compared to my current ROI of 36% (Over 180 trnys)at the 6's or should I stay where I am until I can build a deeper roll and then take the shot?

If you're rolled for the $16 turbos, move up. The players are almost as bad as the $6.50s and the rake is lower. Your sample size at both the $6.50s and $16s is too small (as is mine) to draw any definitive trends, if you're playing well you should do well at the $16s.
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
drmcboy
Post Posted: Wed, 06 Dec 2006, 10:21pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 7971
WPP: 67

I'm not buying better players = less varience.

I also think you'll turn a pretty nice profit if you could really get your money in in this spot every SNG you played. You're getting an OK price and when you win, assuming full stacks, you have a massive CL with 6 or less players left. Sign me up.
View user's profile Send private message
gingerwizard
Post Posted: Thu, 07 Dec 2006, 4:38am    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 1597
WPP: 128

Better players = less variance IN TURBOS. You need to push to stay alive at some point. Better players may understand that you are stealing but don't risk their tournaments on it. So your fold equity is better. Better players may mean that they are harder to beat, but I would call that a measure of skill not variance.

Variance implies that you should have won there but you lost. Like when Aces are cracked by sixes and such. It will happen in poker thats the nature of the game, but at the lower levels it happens more because people protect their sixes and treat them like aces.

I hear you all asking "isn't it a poker players dream to always have our big pushed hands called?" and yes thats true but in turbos:

a) You push a wider range
b) Getting sucked out on once is usually enough to end the tournament
c) Bad players sometimes have good hands.

So the fact that lower stakes have bad players who call with far too many bad hands increases VARIANCE. Now at higher levels im sure the increased skill of the opposition reduces your ROI but this is not variance. This is getting beat by good/better players.
View user's profile Send private message
drmcboy
Post Posted: Thu, 07 Dec 2006, 1:20pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 7971
WPP: 67

Quote:
at higher levels im sure the increased skill of the opposition reduces your ROI but this is not variance


true. But if everyone understands push fold poker, you end up in a lot more flips and more 37o vs AT spots, which will increase your variance as well.

Quote:

Better players may understand that you are stealing but don't risk their tournaments on it. So


Better players will call if they are ahead of your range because they understand EV and ICM and don't worry about meaningless concepts like 'tourney life".

Quote:
Variance implies that you should have won there but you lost.


No, variance implies that something outside the statistical normal has occurred. Like being OOTM 20 straight. And this will happen. And you will get your money in less good more often at higher levels vs lower. And your variance will go up, because people aren't giving you extra chips to survive races with as often. Note I am talking about your $$ win rate. You chip stack may fluctuate more in a low turbo, but it is an upward trend overall because people are putting their chips in bad.

Quote:
a measure of skill not variance


If we had infinite time, sure, but as you say you have to start pushing sooner rather than later. Again, more races.

This is important because saying there is more luck at the low levels is a way of restating the old newbie saw that it will be easier to play once you move up because people understand poker. This is extremely untrue and will lead you to dissapointment. You move up in levels because your total profit improves at every level enough to justify losing ROI because of better play. When that is not true, you stop moving up.
View user's profile Send private message
gingerwizard
Post Posted: Thu, 07 Dec 2006, 1:48pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 1597
WPP: 128

I wouldnt say things will be easier moving up. I don't agree with that. If a player is better than a certain level that means he consistently wins there. End.

I don't like turbos because I just don't get any satisfaction out of push fold poker anymore. They are better for profits as they are quicker to play and have healthier pools but I don't think im made for them. You just wait around for a favorable situation and push. Then 30-60% of the time you lose and its goodnight vienna. Played three in a row this weekend with a total of only 6 hands (Av 2 per tourny)!

Its back to the standards for me and cash. More time for poker skill to tell. If you analyse most of the pushes I've made over the last 20 tournies they are mostly Hugely +EV so I understand the discipline, i just don't have the temperament or the desire to play exclusively shove/fold poker anymore. I find it demoralising and therefore a waste of time. I want to enjoy poker and be profitable, it is still a passtime for me and not my living.

I mentioned in one of my recent posts that id go through all of my recent HH and to be honest on average they were 6 or 7 hands long with a bad beat/good push into monster tacked onto the end. Where is the scope for enthusiasm and willingness to improve in there? I may not be that good, but I want to be and I'm not learning anything from turbos ATM.

drmcboy wrote:
Variance implies that something outside the statistical normal has occured


No that is a common misconception. Variance is the statistical normal. People on here describe variance as when something unlikely happens, and statistically the unlikely HAS to happen over large enough samples.
View user's profile Send private message
drmcboy
Post Posted: Thu, 07 Dec 2006, 2:07pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 7971
WPP: 67

Quote:
Variance implies that you should have won there but you lost. Like when Aces are cracked by sixes and such.


Quote:
Variance is the statistical normal. People on here describe variance as when something unlikely happens, and statistically the unlikely HAS to happen over large enough samples.


I don't want to get into a verbage discussion really, but AA 'should' be cracked by 66 about 20 % of the time. I am not sure how you match up statement 1 with 2. When you lose with AA 5 times in a row, we (FTR) call it short term variance (because we don't like to say bad luck), I don't know if that's right per the math dictionary.
View user's profile Send private message
gingerwizard
Post Posted: Thu, 07 Dec 2006, 2:15pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 1597
WPP: 128

I see what you're saying.
View user's profile Send private message
WildBobAA
Post Posted: Thu, 07 Dec 2006, 2:21pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Season III
Season III

Joined: 20 Aug 2005
Posts: 1779
WPP: 124
Location: Winning 1 of 1 games
ginger, reading your sig, you need to read up on Bankroll Management. $300 is not enough to be playing $11s
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address WordPress Blog
drmcboy
Post Posted: Thu, 07 Dec 2006, 3:01pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Straight Flush
Straight Flush

Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 7971
WPP: 67

Bob - how many BI do you recommend? I think 30 is fine as long as you're OK moving down.
View user's profile Send private message
gingerwizard
Post Posted: Thu, 07 Dec 2006, 4:56pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
4-of-a-Kind
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 1597
WPP: 128

I did read up and ask around and was told 20 was ok but 30 was better. Im not moving anywhere till i am convinced im consistently beating the $5.50s anyway, the sig is pre downswing. Don't worry about my BR, worry about my game Wink
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT - 4 Hours

  >    > 

Longterm ROI question

  

Post new topic   Reply to topic


 
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot rate topics in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


.  Forum style based on NoseBleed by mikelothar.com.   

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.