| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Sat, 30 Sep 2006, 5:52pm Post subject: Intersting point on gambling prohibition
|
 |
|
Season I
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 2360
WPP: 74
Location: Dallas, TX
|
|
INTRASTATE TRANSACTIONS.—The
4 term ‘unlawful Internet gambling’ does not in-
5 clude placing, receiving, or otherwise transmit-
6 ting a bet or wager where—
7 ‘‘(i) the bet or wager is initiated and
8 received or otherwise made exclusively
9 within a single State;
...does this suggest that I could set up PokerStarsTX.com and not get in trouble as long as it was Texas-players-only? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 30 Sep 2006, 6:24pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Season I
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 2360
WPP: 74
Location: Dallas, TX
|
|
| or, rather ... some state without a state law against gambling? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 30 Sep 2006, 7:49pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 501
WPP: 122
|
|
| Yes, 2+2 people have been saying that this is true. But really, how usefull would that be? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 30 Sep 2006, 9:22pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 03 Mar 2006
Posts: 777
WPP: 103
Location: mashing buttons
|
|
only playing players in one state
i think i'll move to the state with the most fish, just gotta research which state that would be
maybe cali, jersey or illinois
no way would i play in texas
don't mess with texass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTR $200 Freeroll at Bet365Poker, November 22nd @ 15:00 ET
