| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Thu, 20 Jan 2005, 6:09am Post subject: Interpoker is hard |
|
|
High Card

Joined: 20 Jan 2005
Posts: 3 WPP: 43
|
|
Everyone is saying that InterPoker is full of fish and that it is easy peasy to win there - but I don't agree at all. I've played at EmpirePoker, MultiPoker and Unibet and I won quite often there - especially at EmpirePoker. At InterPoker everything just went straight to h-ll. Lost everything and just had a really bad experience.
I also think their counting of the raked hands is a bit weird. I've played a lot of hands but they claim I've have a massive amount of rakes to play before I get my Bonus (which I don't intend to get anyway). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 20 Jan 2005, 6:42am Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 144 WPP: 115
Location: MA
|
|
| It can be "easy pickins" just because of the popularity that poker has gained in the past few years. Everyone wants a piece of it. The internet is the easiest and least intimidating place for these fish to swim to, but theres still quite a few sharks out there who will gladly take your money. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 20 Jan 2005, 8:43am Post subject: |
|
|
Straight

Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 209 WPP: 53
|
|
Jeppski,
If you are not used to playing .50/1 or 1/2 then InterPoker can be intimidating, because you are not comfortable (playing above your bankroll). The lowest limit that InterPoker has is 1/2.
As for counting raked hands. I use PokerTracker, I will manually total the number of raked hands I played in each session. This has been quite accurate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 20 Jan 2005, 2:23pm Post subject: |
|
|
High Card

Joined: 20 Jan 2005
Posts: 3 WPP: 43
|
|
Jes_gru,
Thanks -I'll check up PokerTracker...
Besides that: Has anyone else had problems "shifting" between different online poker sites? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 20 Jan 2005, 2:40pm Post subject: |
|
|
i wouldn't mind a change...

Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 4571 WPP: 87
Location: TagFish
|
|
InterPoker is just a different type of player. They are very weak-loose if you know what i mean, where as Poker Stars is weak-tight and Party is just weak.
InterPoker is also home to europeans that play their mostly. Those crazy brits have minds of their own... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 20 Jan 2005, 4:46pm Post subject: |
|
|
High Card

Joined: 20 Jan 2005
Posts: 3 WPP: 43
|
|
| sound like I'm moving to Party (or just back to Empire...) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Jan 2005, 12:53am Post subject: |
|
|
Full House

Joined: 24 Sep 2004
Posts: 1151 WPP: 131
Location: Nest of Douchebags
|
|
| If you're playing ring games, isn't party and Empire the same thing? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|