| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 4:11pm Post subject: Help Defend the Legality of Online Poker!
|
 |
|
Administrator
Joined: 04 Dec 2003
Posts: 1177
WPP: 98
|
|
Visit this thread and send your House Representative a letter urging him/her to vote against Representative Bob Goodlatte's bill to outlaw online poker! This bill is utterly ridiculous - it suggests that online poker is not a skill game and should be outlawed (yet state lotteries and betting on horses is ok), and that the ISP's would deny access to these websites... doesn't that sound like a serious infringement on our own rights?
Fight the power and rage against the machine and all that!!!
http://capwiz.com/pokerplayersalliance/issues/alert/?alertid=8522976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 4:18pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 725
WPP: 73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 5:17pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 7935
WPP: 67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 6:14pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 25 May 2005
Posts: 691
WPP: 79
|
|
| done and done. nj has been spoken for. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 6:38pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 813
WPP: 145
Location: Mount Holly, NC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 6:44pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 801
WPP: 166
Location: Over there!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 6:54pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 831
WPP: 104
Location: Yo Mamma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 6:54pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3476
WPP: 102
Location: The Grind
|
|
Your e-mail message was sent to:
Virginia Foxx (R-NC 5th)
Edit: Virginia Foxx is a fucking dolt.
2nd Edit: Normally I don't talk much about politics. I really dislike talking about politics. However, I feel the need to say something now.
I wish these fucking fatass republican bastards who became politicians because they suck at life so bad would quit putting up an act like they really lift a fucking finger for their fatass paycheck.
*huff and puff*
Okay. I think I'm better now. |
Last edited by spoonitnow on Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 2:58am; edited 2 times in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 6:57pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 1103
WPP: 142
|
|
| must suck to live in the US right now if this is an issue. having to pay taxes on winnings on top, and canada looks even better than usual. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 7:11pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Crazy Canadian Courtiebwnage
Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 2631
WPP: 101
Location: google image happy flower
|
|
It sucks for everyone. How many Americans play online poker? Tons. If they can't play, who the hell are us Canadians gonna play? Europeans, yay  This is an issue for everyone who plays online poker. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 7:31pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 1
Joined: 05 Mar 2005
Posts: 49
WPP: 107
|
|
| spoonitnow wrote: | I wish these fucking fatass republican bastards who became politicians because they suck at life so bad would quit putting up an act like they really life a fucking finger for their fatass paycheck.
|
You mean like running your car off a bridge and leaving your "date" in it to die? Or you mean like spooging on some ugly fat bitch while you're talking to leader of a foreign nation? Or maybe you mean lying about being wounded by "enemy" fire to get a Purple Heart and an early trip home? Whoops, those were all Donks.
Don't point the finger at "Republican politicians". They are ALL worthless shitbags. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 8:06pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 801
WPP: 166
Location: Over there!
|
|
| Or how about a bunch of dumbasses keep trying to ruin threads! Keep it on topic dumbasses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 8:39pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 3289
WPP: 119
|
|
| courtiebee wrote: | | If they can't play, who the hell are us Canadians gonna play? Europeans, yay |
I don't exactly know what you're trying to say, but I'm not happy.
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 8:52pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 813
WPP: 145
Location: Mount Holly, NC
|
|
| Quote: | | I wish these fucking fatass republican bastards who became politicians because they suck at life so bad would quit putting up an act like they really life a fucking finger for their fatass paycheck. | Look at who co-signed the bill....two republicans and a democrat, so instead of your adolescent cursing and political grandstanding use your abundant energy and email the link to all the poker players you know. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 07 Mar 2006, 11:16pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 246
WPP: 90
Location: FlopTurnRivered
|
|
Wow - Whats with the anti online poker attitude,
Just move to Scotland - No taxes need paid on your winnings!!!!!!
It is the Best country in the world after all  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 2:37am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 09 Jan 2005
Posts: 944
WPP: 108
Location: California
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 2:43am Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 725
WPP: 73
|
|
| Gareth wrote: | Wow - Whats with the anti online poker attitude,
Just move to Scotland - No taxes need paid on your winnings!!!!!!
It is the Best country in the world after all |
hahahahhahahahhahahahaha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 2:57am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3476
WPP: 102
Location: The Grind
|
|
For fairness.
I wish these fucking fatass democrat bastards who became politicians because they suck at life so bad would quit putting up an act like they really lift a fucking finger for their fatass paycheck.
There, that's better. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 9:30am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 01 Nov 2005
Posts: 3026
WPP: 115
Location: GO BUCKS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 4:56pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 01 Jul 2005
Posts: 350
WPP: 594
|
|
| It just so happens that my congressman's wife was my Gifted Education Teacher in High School who knows me pretty well, if I don't get a response back soon on this issue, I'll calling her to see if I can speak with him regarding this...I love connections. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 5:23pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 10 Apr 2005
Posts: 1529
WPP: 75
Location: Canadian LOLUH'S AND AMERICAN LOLUHS
|
|
| lambchopdc wrote: | | It just so happens that my congressman's wife was my Gifted Education Teacher in High School |
you were a sped? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 5:36pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3037
WPP: 95
|
|
| Muxy wrote: | | lambchopdc wrote: | | It just so happens that my congressman's wife was my Gifted Education Teacher in High School |
you were a sped? |
BWNED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 5:42pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 1524
WPP: 109
|
|
| daluchy wrote: | | done and done. nj has been spoken for. |
Did this weeks ago but I brought up the UAE Port issue. I got a response from one NJ Dem. telling me they plan to block the UAE Port proposal. I guess I distracted them from the reason I was really writing them. I'm not even clear on why they want to ban it. I just know the reason can't be logical. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 5:58pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3476
WPP: 102
Location: The Grind
|
|
| lambchopdc wrote: | | It just so happens that my congressman's wife was my Gifted Education Teacher in High School who knows me pretty well, if I don't get a response back soon on this issue, I'll calling her to see if I can speak with him regarding this...I love connections. |
Well played |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 6:55pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 1
Joined: 05 Mar 2005
Posts: 49
WPP: 107
|
|
| r8ed wrote: | | daluchy wrote: | | done and done. nj has been spoken for. |
Did this weeks ago but I brought up the UAE Port issue. I got a response from one NJ Dem. telling me they plan to block the UAE Port proposal. I guess I distracted them from the reason I was really writing them. I'm not even clear on why they want to ban it. I just know the reason can't be logical. |
You can't be serious? They want to ban it because they can't tax it. Even if the "ban" doesn't go through, you know that some sort of extra "Internet Gambling Tax" will be added. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 7:08pm Post subject:
|
|
|
OLD MAN RIVER
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3682
WPP: 79
Location: Canuckistan
|
|
| courtiebee wrote: | | It sucks for everyone. How many Americans play online poker? Tons. If they can't play, who the hell are us Canadians gonna play? Europeans, yay This is an issue for everyone who plays online poker. |
Anyone know what proportion of online players are US based? I've heard it's over half, but can't remember where I read it. Regardless, that's a lot of fish to take out of the pond - not that I think it's gonna happen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 7:20pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 01 Jul 2005
Posts: 350
WPP: 594
|
|
Ok, so apparantly today the Senate snuck their version of the amendment into some random energy bill, but apparantly it doesn't matter because they have done this every year and its been deleted when the bill gets to conference committee. Also apparantly the World Trade Organization will BWN the US if they go through with this anyway. Quote from Pocket Fives -
| Quote: | I believe the amendment was tacked on to an Energy Subsidy Bill for the poor that was passed in the Senate today. More importantly, though, is that Sen. Kyl has had an amendment passed to ban online gambling virtually every year (the first one passed 90-10 in 1998), yet the problem is that the text of the Senate bill is very different from the text of the house bill and they (over about 6 years of trying) have never been able to reach a comprimise. Most importantly in question is an exemption for Off-Track betting and the ability for Intra-state online gaming over interstate internet connections. So, all in all, the amendment will be tacked on to a bill that the Senate must pass (Sen. Kyl has done this in the past tp avoid debate on the bill), but it does not match to house bill, and gambling will remain in the gray area it currently is.
Additionally, the WTO courts have ruled in the Aruba decision that the US cannot ban online gambling unless it bans all gambling (including state lottery). Thus, any gambling ban would still not be enforced becasue the US would then subject itself to WTO penalty. Hehe, our government is selling out ports to a UAE company, Dick Cheney is shooting people, and our senators are working to sneak legislation in that bans a hobby! Gotta love congress. |
I'm gonna look into this WTO to see what its about. But it sounds promissing because you KNOW the US won't ditch state lottery. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 7:35pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 01 Jul 2005
Posts: 350
WPP: 594
|
|
Well....the US government is retarded....thats all I can say...apparantly they tried banning online gaming before...and the WTO PWNED them....go World Trade Organization -
EDIT: Ok that article sucked...
Does anyone have a NY Times Subscription who can get this article for me -
TECHNOLOGY; Trade Group Says U.S. Ban on Net Gambling Violates Global Law
More information. March 26, 2004, Friday
By MATT RICHTEL (NYT); Business/Financial Desk
Late Edition - Final, Section C, Page 5, Column 2, 1101 words
DISPLAYING FIRST 50 OF 1101 WORDS -The World Trade Organization, in its first decision on an Internet-related dispute, has ignited a political, cultural and legal tinderbox by ruling that the United States policy prohibiting online gambling violates international trade law. The ruling, issued by a W.T.O. panel on Wednesday, is being hailed by operators of
I can't get the rest without paying for it. |
Last edited by lambchopdc on Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 7:47pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 7:46pm Post subject:
|
|
|
OLD MAN RIVER
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3682
WPP: 79
Location: Canuckistan
|
|
| WTO rulings mean squat to US politicians. Canada has won tons of these against the US in our ongoing softwood lumber dispute, but does the US care? No. The US will do whatever it wants, whenever it wants, and will always act in its best interest first (ie. business interest). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 7:56pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 01 Jul 2005
Posts: 350
WPP: 594
|
|
| Warpe wrote: | | WTO rulings mean squat to US politicians. Canada has won tons of these against the US in our ongoing softwood lumber dispute, but does the US care? No. The US will do whatever it wants, whenever it wants, and will always act in its best interest first (ie. business interest). |
Why does every post about things like this have to turn into a US bashing? Stupid Canucks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 8:07pm Post subject:
|
|
|
OLD MAN RIVER
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3682
WPP: 79
Location: Canuckistan
|
|
| lambchopdc wrote: | | Warpe wrote: | | WTO rulings mean squat to US politicians. Canada has won tons of these against the US in our ongoing softwood lumber dispute, but does the US care? No. The US will do whatever it wants, whenever it wants, and will always act in its best interest first (ie. business interest). |
Why does every post about things like this have to turn into a US bashing? Stupid Canucks. |
It's not intended as a US bash, so please don't take it as such (and I'll ignore the Canucks comment). It's just a reality. The US is a superpower, in both military and economic terms, and as such does not allow itself to be dictated to by organizations such as the WTO, unless it deems that complying with certain international agreements/treaties is in its interest.
As far as online gaming goes, who stands to gain in the US if it is made an illegal activity? Who stands to lose? Are gambling interests in the US losing money to offshore gambling interests because it exists or getting a bigger customer base because of increased exposure? Or both? Or do US gambling interests have a piece of the action anyway? The answers to those questions are what will ultimately determine whether it survives or not. Follow the money. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 8:17pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 01 Jul 2005
Posts: 350
WPP: 594
|
|
| Warpe wrote: | | lambchopdc wrote: | | Warpe wrote: | | WTO rulings mean squat to US politicians. Canada has won tons of these against the US in our ongoing softwood lumber dispute, but does the US care? No. The US will do whatever it wants, whenever it wants, and will always act in its best interest first (ie. business interest). |
Why does every post about things like this have to turn into a US bashing? Stupid Canucks. |
It's not intended as a US bash, so please don't take it as such (and I'll ignore the Canucks comment). It's just a reality. The US is a superpower, in both military and economic terms, and as such does not allow itself to be dictated to by organizations such as the WTO, unless it deems that complying with certain international agreements/treaties is in its interest.
As far as online gaming goes, who stands to gain in the US if it is made an illegal activity? Who stands to lose? Are gambling interests in the US losing money to offshore gambling interests because it exists or getting a bigger customer base because of increased exposure? Or both? Or do US gambling interests have a piece of the action anyway? The answers to those questions are what will ultimately determine whether it survives or not. Follow the money. |
You miss another point.....in the US, if the people bitch for long enough and loud enough, we eventually get our way. Poker being the 3rd most watched sport in the nation right now....if this issue gets big enough...I have full faith the public will eventually win. Votes = power. Thats why we send e-mails like this post says, because if you put pressure on politicians with your power to fire their asses when their term ends, you can influence their decisions. And for that, I love this Country. And btw, I was joking about the Canucks thing, but I still hate your country for allowing Muxy to be born. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 08 Mar 2006, 8:50pm Post subject:
|
|
|
OLD MAN RIVER
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3682
WPP: 79
Location: Canuckistan
|
|
| lambchopdc wrote: |
You miss another point.....in the US, if the people bitch for long enough and loud enough, we eventually get our way. Poker being the 3rd most watched sport in the nation right now....if this issue gets big enough...I have full faith the public will eventually win. Votes = power. Thats why we send e-mails like this post says, because if you put pressure on politicians with your power to fire their asses when their term ends, you can influence their decisions. And for that, I love this Country. And btw, I was joking about the Canucks thing, but I still hate your country for allowing Muxy to be born. |
I just hope for everyone's sake that some faction of the far Republican right doesn't take up banning online gambling as a mission, because I think they could mobilize more voters than the poker 'community' ever could, given the right stimulus.
Don't be dissin' my countryman, the Muxy. He can't help it. He wasn't born, he's a genetic experiment gone wrong (why do you think he wears the hoody?). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 09 Mar 2006, 10:29am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3037
WPP: 95
|
|
| Warpe wrote: | | The US is a superpower, in both military and economic terms, and as such does not allow itself to be dictated to by organizations such as the WTO, unless it deems that complying with certain international agreements/treaties is in its interest. |
There's an axiomatic truth that explains why the US regularly does what it wants. Most of the international community is completely retarded (not canada). This WTO thing is accidentally logical. By that I mean the WTO is really only interested in the US money, but they have a human rights leg to stand on as they attempt the widescale pilferage. Just my ignorant badly thought out opinion.
I can see high ranking WTO officials in a back room somewhere going "rake it bitch!". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 12 Mar 2006, 4:12pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 10 Apr 2005
Posts: 1529
WPP: 75
Location: Canadian LOLUH'S AND AMERICAN LOLUHS
|
|
| Warpe wrote: | | lambchopdc wrote: |
You miss another point.....in the US, if the people bitch for long enough and loud enough, we eventually get our way. Poker being the 3rd most watched sport in the nation right now....if this issue gets big enough...I have full faith the public will eventually win. Votes = power. Thats why we send e-mails like this post says, because if you put pressure on politicians with your power to fire their asses when their term ends, you can influence their decisions. And for that, I love this Country. And btw, I was joking about the Canucks thing, but I still hate your country for allowing Muxy to be born. |
I just hope for everyone's sake that some faction of the far Republican right doesn't take up banning online gambling as a mission, because I think they could mobilize more voters than the poker 'community' ever could, given the right stimulus.
Don't be dissin' my countryman, the Muxy. He can't help it. He wasn't born, he's a genetic experiment gone wrong (why do you think he wears the hoody?). |
Not my fault the chemicals they put in my when i was in the womb. Made me P________s bigger.
Guesse what starts with P and ends with S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 12 Mar 2006, 8:10pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 725
WPP: 73
|
|
parrots?
lolol nah dog jk. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 12 Mar 2006, 9:45pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 10 Apr 2005
Posts: 1529
WPP: 75
Location: Canadian LOLUH'S AND AMERICAN LOLUHS
|
|
| journey075 wrote: | parrots?
lolol nah dog jk. |
My pancreas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 15 Mar 2006, 5:39pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 12 Sep 2005
Posts: 838
WPP: 207
Location: The Internetz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 26 Mar 2006, 9:44am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 329
WPP: 98
Location: NY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 26 Mar 2006, 5:47pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3476
WPP: 102
Location: The Grind
|
|
| Okay so what's new with this? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 01 May 2006, 5:43pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3253
WPP: 178
Location: at the pool
|
|
bump
someone give me some good info here |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 08 May 2006, 12:56pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 892
WPP: 80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 09 May 2006, 1:15pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Administrator
Joined: 04 Dec 2003
Posts: 1177
WPP: 98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 09 May 2006, 1:45pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair
Joined: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 36
WPP: 59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 09 May 2006, 2:05pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Administrator
Joined: 04 Dec 2003
Posts: 1177
WPP: 98
|
|
Very encouraging. I feel much better. There's more legislation against online poker and a new letter that we can send to our US Senators and House Rep's.
http://capwiz.com/keep_it_legal/issues/alert/?alertid=8637406
Fill this out ASAP! No retard politician that I wouldn't hire to mow my lawn is going to tell me whether I can play poker or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 09 May 2006, 4:59pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair
Joined: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 36
WPP: 59
|
|
| Encouraging in that the article points out that the legislation, if it's even passed, faces a host of hurdles in its enforcement (at least with respect to individuals). I'm encouraged, but I don't derive a substantial part of my livelihood from poker or related businesses, so the outcome isn't as meaningful to me as it probably is to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 24 May 2006, 4:16pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight
Joined: 23 Sep 2005
Posts: 114
WPP: 354
Location: Delaware USA
|
|
when y'all started discussing this I sent a letter to my Senators (I didn't know it was just a House Bill at time) and my Representative stating in brief that:
1. Gambling is a victimless "crime" (assuming it becomes illegal) in that people only victimize themselves.
2. Since The Government is probably mostly interested in this for the loss of tax base, I propose that perhaps the government put in place a simple tracking system which tracks money in and money out so that sites can essentially issue a W2 form. Now before y'all get all honked up at me for introducing a "tracking system" i put it to you that it's better than elimination of poker from US web traffic.
3. Making on line poker illegal would lead to making B&M Casinos illegal and that will be fought tooth and nail.
4. Making it illegal would only introduce "black market" betting with lesser controls, greater options to defraud government out of taxes (their primary concern) and greater opportunities to defraud the individual.
I am sure they gave a shit one way or another what I though.
And there goes another sarcasm meter overloaded. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 15 Jun 2006, 5:42pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Administrator
Joined: 04 Dec 2003
Posts: 1748
WPP: 155
Location: on my laptop
|
|
Sent. Having a California address, mine went to the following:
Representative Lungren
Senator Boxer
Senator Feinstein
Boxer and Feinstein sent auto-replies saying to fill out forms on their sites which I did. Lungren's auto-reply said that he will respond shortly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 15 Jun 2006, 5:48pm Post subject:
|
|
|
The Greatest American Hero
Joined: 04 Dec 2003
Posts: 5241
WPP: 91
Location: facebook.com/xianti
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 17 Jun 2006, 6:50am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight
Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 173
WPP: 83
Location: Ewa Beach
|
|
| Did my part Reppin' Hawaii. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Tilt Poker FTOPS XIV - Event 9 $500+$35 NLH Heads Up
