| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 1:14pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 1103 WPP: 142
|
|
couple things that I don't think are being taken into account Re: using CC's to pay bills.
First, you realize that cash advances on CC's start to accrue interest immediately. And usually at a higher rate than purchases. So, you are starting off taking a hit there.
Second, by adding monthly CC bills to the occasion you are increasing your monthly expenses, or X, right off the bat. With the small starting bankroll this spells disaster.
Also, thinking long term. You will be stunting the growth of your bankroll by having to constantly withdraw from it. This stunts your progression up stakes, and stunts your potential earn. This could set you back a year or more from where you could be if you waited until properly rolled to take a shot at going pro.
If, instead of going pro immediately, you worked your soul-sucking job for 6 months while building a roll and moving up in stakes, you could conceivably be playing 100NL properly rolled, and earning much more than $20/hr. At that time, going pro can be done more easily. You should be able to have enough in reserve to cover a few months, while still having the bankroll to play properly.
By taking the shot too early and bringing in credit cards, you would severely reduce your chances of making a long-term living off of poker, and would increase your chances of going busto, and having CC debt to work off at your new $8/hr job. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 1:32pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3549 WPP: 101
Location: The Grind
|
|
Consider the following.
If a decent 25nl player started playing 25nl with about a $500 bankroll and ran 4.5 ptbb/100 over 30k hands, he will have around $1175. Getting 900 hands/hour (16-tabling) yields $20.25/hour. This fits the profile of the Hero we have mentioned in the original post. Over those 30k hands of 25nl, he or she will have stats similar to this:
35 hours played
4.5 ptbb/100 winrate
32 ptbb/100 standard deviation
What level of confidence can we have that Hero is a winning player?
Answer: No more than 59%.
So we have a 40% chance of going back to our $9/hour job with credit card debt.
| pgil wrote: | | If, instead of going pro immediately, you worked your soul-sucking job for 6 months while building a roll and moving up in stakes, you could conceivably be playing 100NL properly rolled, and earning much more than $20/hr. At that time, going pro can be done more easily. You should be able to have enough in reserve to cover a few months, while still having the bankroll to play properly. |
This is the correct reply and thus concludes the thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 1:35pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Almost as bad as that idiot heybude

Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 3068 WPP: 71
|
|
| by bills do you mean cost of living? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 1:46pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3549 WPP: 101
Location: The Grind
|
|
| Massimo wrote: | | by bills do you mean cost of living? |
Yes. Cost of living would probably be a better wording for the purposes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 2:06pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair

Joined: 23 Jan 2008
Posts: 31 WPP: 216
|
|
I guess I misunderstood the problem. I thought we knew could beat the game at $20/hr. Your point about uncertainty in win rates is something that I think anyone considering going pro would want to think long and hard about, but I thought we assumed this out of the problem. How do you do this calculation, btw?
Also, I did not think we had the option of building our bankroll for 6 months, since we only were interested in finding the current value of X. Of course, if you have the option of waiting until you have a bigger roll with a buffer to pay bills, you definitely should.
I was imagining a player with closer to 300k hands of history that, for whatever reason, had spent most of the money he made. I also had in mind a player that was playing fewer tables with a win rate around 8ptbb/100. This player is in a vastly different situation than the player you had in mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 9:57pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 7939 WPP: 71
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
|
|
going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 10:11pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 26 Sep 2006
Posts: 862 WPP: 152
Location: wondering where the 3 extra chairs at my 6max table came from
|
|
Miffed is back, Miffed is back, Miffed is back!!!!!!
yo, what's crackin' Miffed? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 21 Mar 2008, 10:27pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 2572 WPP: 145
Location: GA
|
|
Fun one spoon. Here's my take.
Hero needs to plan only making about $5 an hour to cover expenses, so assuming 70 hours of poker per week, $350 can be life expense. The other $15 an hour goes to downswings, building bankroll, paying taxes, etc.
The other consideration is whether, if times get rough, hero can play 90 or 100 hours in a week at his best level - all while running bad. If he's running bad, he will have to keep playing well and play more hands to make ends meet.
Of course, there are safer ways, like earning $600 bucks a week for a month playing poker 30 hours while keeping the job and launching the pro career 4 weeks late. But that wasn't the question.
So X = $350 / week. Which is less than he's making now with the day job, although it appears we're assuming $9 an hour is take home pay. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 8:26am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3549 WPP: 101
Location: The Grind
|
|
In all honesty, the point of this thread was as follows.
In the past week I've heard at least 4 different people talk about how they should quit their job and "go pro" at 25nl just because over a relatively small sample they've made approximately twice at 25nl that they do at their job.
Unfortunately none of those people posted in this thread, but I'll refer them to it the next time I see them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 10:31am Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair

Joined: 23 Jan 2008
Posts: 31 WPP: 216
|
|
| Is it safe to say that you would want at the Absolute minimum 200k hands of history at 8ptbb/100 or 400k hands at 4ptbb/100 before you could ever quit your job, regardless of bankroll? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 1:28pm Post subject:
|
|
|
HABITUAL LINE-STEPPER

Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 5719 WPP: 72
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
| Pasta wrote: | | Is it safe to say that you would want at the Absolute minimum 200k hands of history at 8ptbb/100 or 400k hands at 4ptbb/100 before you could ever quit your job, regardless of bankroll? |
there is probably no ftr member, ever, who as attained either of those milestones. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 2:35pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3549 WPP: 101
Location: The Grind
|
|
| Pasta wrote: | | Is it safe to say that you would want at the Absolute minimum 200k hands of history at 8ptbb/100 or 400k hands at 4ptbb/100 before you could ever quit your job, regardless of bankroll? |
why the poop would you play that many hands of 25nl and not move up?
| Renton wrote: | | Pasta wrote: | | Is it safe to say that you would want at the Absolute minimum 200k hands of history at 8ptbb/100 or 400k hands at 4ptbb/100 before you could ever quit your job, regardless of bankroll? |
there is probably no ftr member, ever, who as attained either of those milestones. |
I might come close to the 400k at +4ptbb/100 at 100nl before it's over with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 4:01pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 7939 WPP: 71
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
|
|
| Pasta wrote: | | Is it safe to say that you would want at the Absolute minimum 200k hands of history at 8ptbb/100 or 400k hands at 4ptbb/100 before you could ever quit your job, regardless of bankroll? |
i think a notable sample showing you earn $100 per hour is more realistic and achievable for anyone who has expectations of going pro. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 5:45pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1477 WPP: 98
Location: swonging and swonging
|
|
| Miffed22001 wrote: | | Pasta wrote: | | Is it safe to say that you would want at the Absolute minimum 200k hands of history at 8ptbb/100 or 400k hands at 4ptbb/100 before you could ever quit your job, regardless of bankroll? |
i think a notable sample showing you earn $100 per hour is more realistic and achievable for anyone who has expectations of going pro. |
As long as we can define "notable sample" (10k? 50k? 100k?) this makes the answer so much simpler.
| Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I think having a job is overrated, so the value of X is irrelevant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 6:21pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 2328 WPP: 97
Location: Viva la Puteria! / Nar Shaddaa Red Sector obv.
|
|
| Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I disagree. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 11:07pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 7939 WPP: 71
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
|
|
| Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I disagree. |
do you guys ever see beyond the end of next year? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 22 Mar 2008, 11:55pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 1254 WPP: 83
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Renton wrote: |
there is probably no ftr member, ever, who as attained either of those milestones. |
I did closer to 6ptbb/100 over 400k hands. Sorry I don't mean to brag, but what you say is simply false. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 23 Mar 2008, 5:05am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 2328 WPP: 97
Location: Viva la Puteria! / Nar Shaddaa Red Sector obv.
|
|
| Miffed22001 wrote: | | Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I disagree. |
do you guys ever see beyond the end of next year? |
yup
much beyond |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 23 Mar 2008, 2:36pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 7939 WPP: 71
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
|
|
| Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | | Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I disagree. |
do you guys ever see beyond the end of next year? |
yup
much beyond |
so why are you quitting to go pro now when the money you are putting away to create the rest of your life with is pitifully small, and not enough?
Going Pro is about creating savings and buying houses etc not just earning enough to pay the rent for the month like a large majority of 'pro's' on here do, except the notable exceptions ofc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 23 Mar 2008, 2:58pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 2328 WPP: 97
Location: Viva la Puteria! / Nar Shaddaa Red Sector obv.
|
|
| Miffed22001 wrote: | | Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | | Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I disagree. |
do you guys ever see beyond the end of next year? |
yup
much beyond |
so why are you quitting to go pro now when the money you are putting away to create the rest of your life with is pitifully small, and not enough?
Going Pro is about winning bigass tournaments and living the baller life etc not just earning enough to pay the rent for the month like a large majority of 'pro's' on here do, except the notable exceptions ofc | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 23 Mar 2008, 5:38pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 1715 WPP: 58
Location: UK
|
|
| Miffed22001 wrote: | | Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | | Jack Sawyer wrote: | | Miffed22001 wrote: | going pro is overrated.
So the value of X is irrelevant. |
I disagree. |
do you guys ever see beyond the end of next year? |
yup
much beyond |
so why are you quitting to go pro now when the money you are putting away to create the rest of your life with is pitifully small, and not enough?
Going Pro is about creating savings and buying houses etc not just earning enough to pay the rent for the month like a large majority of 'pro's' on here do, except the notable exceptions ofc |
Yeah, I remember a thread at 2+2 about being pro and someone smart (nycballer I think) said "the best pros here will be making less than 20% of their income from poker in 10 years time". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 24 Mar 2008, 1:01am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 2372 WPP: 74
Location: Here and There
|
|
| Go pro when you feel confident enough to be able to pay for everything on a constant basis with your winnings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 10:04pm Post subject:
|
|
|
|
|
| i made 17 dollars an hour at my dayjob. I went pro once I had a solid sample size of making over 100 dollars an hour at poker. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 10:36pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3603 WPP: 99
Location: Your place or my place
|
|
| I went pro when I got fired from work for skipping work to play poker. I recommend this method. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 10:44pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 106 WPP: 66
|
|
| I dunno personally I'd prefer to win all the money I wanted first (say enough for 6 months) then quit. Seems like as soon as poker becomes a job it'd start sucking ass. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Apr 2008, 8:00am Post subject: The third side of a coin is the edge.
|
|
|
|
|
| When you get there, you'll be there. But, no matter where you go that's, just where you are... If, I can live like a millionaire on, 70K/yr, so be it. There's more to life than poker. But, there's nothing like it.....Whatever, pays the bills....."Money won, is so much sweeter than money earned"._ Paul Newman/The color of money |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 02 Apr 2008, 12:21am Post subject:
|
|
|
High Card

Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 11 WPP: 109
Location: Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 02 Apr 2008, 9:18am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 06 Jun 2007
Posts: 1449 WPP: 63
Location: NS, Canada
|
|
i havent worked for 5 years and killed my local casino 15-30 limit/1-2/2-4 no limit games. I went pro after reading ED miller's book " small stakes holdem winning big with expert play" and limit poker was most popular at the time  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 02 Apr 2008, 1:11pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair

Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 37 WPP: 93
|
|
| spoonitnow wrote: | I'm trying to reply to everyone, but if I miss you don't take it personally.
| daven wrote: | | regardless of x, hero shouldn't go pro. |
| Cocco_Bill wrote: | | You can not quit a job and go pro with a $1100 bankroll. Insanity! |
What if X is close to 0?
| Andrew wrote: | | So as long as your bills are less that $1,200 a month then you should think of going pro. |
But that's more than our current bankroll...?
| pgil wrote: | | x = about 200. our hourly rate is irrelevant at this point. more important is our bankroll. We would ideally want 3-4 months worth in reserve, over and above what we need to play. |
This is the most logical response so far, imo.
| d0zer wrote: | | Until I'm making about 1.5-3x (depending on how bad variance is up there) my current income, I wouldn't... |
Again, what if X is close to 0? Also, if there was little to no chance of getting a raise or any type of advancement in your job (which is typical of the jobs college students get)?
| dev wrote: | | Very few responses here are original. This is a topic that's been rehashed repeatedly in magazines, articles, books, and message boards. |
I agree, but perhaps that's because it's sometimes hard to be creative when there is a limited window of correct ways to do something and be successful.
| dev wrote: | | Going pro is as easy as quitting your job. Assuming you're an adult and capable of going broke and surviving the ordeal, fuck it. Take your shot. Learn your lesson. |
This is soooooo wrong, but like you said it's just something you heard. There is so much more to it than "quit your job and see what happens", and the likelihood of succeeding with this approach depends heavily upon X.
| cowboyardee wrote: | | $600/week is more than $360/week, so assuming your benefits at work suck, x is a non-factor. Or I guess you could say that if your added expenses (medical insurance and such) after quitting your job add up to less than $240/week, you should do it in a strictly financial sense. |
There's much more to it than the strict math, DOUCY? |
R u serious op? All you answer with is questions that infer that peoples answers are wrong. On the last two you just straight tell people their opinions are wrong... when this is a general opinion answer question. X is defined by each persons opinion. Also people are trying to tell you, your question sucks because it does. OP Heads up for rolls? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 02 Apr 2008, 1:26pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 3074 WPP: 65
Location: Spewing
|
|
| HybridTt wrote: | | OP Heads up for rolls? |
Awesome |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 28 May 2008, 9:25am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3549 WPP: 101
Location: The Grind
|
|
| HybridTt wrote: | | spoonitnow wrote: | I'm trying to reply to everyone, but if I miss you don't take it personally.
| daven wrote: | | regardless of x, hero shouldn't go pro. |
| Cocco_Bill wrote: | | You can not quit a job and go pro with a $1100 bankroll. Insanity! |
What if X is close to 0?
| Andrew wrote: | | So as long as your bills are less that $1,200 a month then you should think of going pro. |
But that's more than our current bankroll...?
| pgil wrote: | | x = about 200. our hourly rate is irrelevant at this point. more important is our bankroll. We would ideally want 3-4 months worth in reserve, over and above what we need to play. |
This is the most logical response so far, imo.
| d0zer wrote: | | Until I'm making about 1.5-3x (depending on how bad variance is up there) my current income, I wouldn't... |
Again, what if X is close to 0? Also, if there was little to no chance of getting a raise or any type of advancement in your job (which is typical of the jobs college students get)?
| dev wrote: | | Very few responses here are original. This is a topic that's been rehashed repeatedly in magazines, articles, books, and message boards. |
I agree, but perhaps that's because it's sometimes hard to be creative when there is a limited window of correct ways to do something and be successful.
| dev wrote: | | Going pro is as easy as quitting your job. Assuming you're an adult and capable of going broke and surviving the ordeal, fuck it. Take your shot. Learn your lesson. |
This is soooooo wrong, but like you said it's just something you heard. There is so much more to it than "quit your job and see what happens", and the likelihood of succeeding with this approach depends heavily upon X.
| cowboyardee wrote: | | $600/week is more than $360/week, so assuming your benefits at work suck, x is a non-factor. Or I guess you could say that if your added expenses (medical insurance and such) after quitting your job add up to less than $240/week, you should do it in a strictly financial sense. |
There's much more to it than the strict math, DOUCY? |
R u serious op? All you answer with is questions that infer that peoples answers are wrong. On the last two you just straight tell people their opinions are wrong... when this is a general opinion answer question. X is defined by each persons opinion. Also people are trying to tell you, your question sucks because it does. OP Heads up for rolls? |
That's because I'm right, {acronym Renton hates}. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 29 May 2008, 8:08pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 18 Oct 2006
Posts: 1623 WPP: 101
Location: San Francisco, CA
|
|
I'd stick your job out till you can get to at least 100nl. Then the money becomes significant (100K/yr possible) and you have more promise to move up than you do now.
As others have said we're not looking to just pay bills, we should be in a capital accumulation mode under the methodology of poker playing with future goals of real estate, business investment, and investment as our long range source of income. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 29 May 2008, 9:27pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 30 May 2006
Posts: 1370 WPP: 234
|
|
| i went pro then stopped playing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 29 May 2008, 9:30pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3549 WPP: 101
Location: The Grind
|
|
| mixchange wrote: | I'd stick your job out till you can get to at least 100nl. Then the money becomes significant (100K/yr possible) and you have more promise to move up than you do now.
As others have said we're not looking to just pay bills, we should be in a capital accumulation mode under the methodology of poker playing with future goals of real estate, business investment, and investment as our long range source of income. |
There you go. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 29 May 2008, 10:11pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3603 WPP: 99
Location: Your place or my place
|
|
Find job with sexy pension upon retirement.
Work it. Play poker when you get home for an hour or two.
"Retire" at 45 and play poker full time.
I call it the "OMG THEYLL PAY ME TO DO THIS?!" plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 29 May 2008, 11:12pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 5689 WPP: 126
Location: Ballarat, Australia
|
|
| wufwugy wrote: | | i went pro then stopped playing |
Hmm, I think theres a flaw with that plan... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 30 May 2008, 12:21am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 30 May 2006
Posts: 1370 WPP: 234
|
|
| bjsaust wrote: | | wufwugy wrote: | | i went pro then stopped playing |
Hmm, I think theres a flaw with that plan... |
its funny, i played a so much all gung ho trying to get to the point where i could quit my job, but when i did i was so sick of playing i went on sabbatical or something. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 30 May 2008, 12:53am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 5689 WPP: 126
Location: Ballarat, Australia
|
|
| I wonder if many people do that? Kind of like a burn out after the big drive to get there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 30 May 2008, 1:58pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3603 WPP: 99
Location: Your place or my place
|
|
| bjsaust wrote: | | I wonder if many people do that? Kind of like a burn out after the big drive to get there. |
Theres a reason a lot of oldbies arent around FTR anymore. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 30 May 2008, 2:57pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1477 WPP: 98
Location: swonging and swonging
|
|
| euphoricism wrote: | | bjsaust wrote: | | I wonder if many people do that? Kind of like a burn out after the big drive to get there. |
Theres a reason a lot of oldbies arent around FTR anymore. | For those that aren't around anymore that at one point went pro, do you suppose more of them quit and gave up poker, succeeded and moved on to other things, or just stopped talking about it or moved to another forum? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 30 May 2008, 8:33pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3603 WPP: 99
Location: Your place or my place
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 31 May 2008, 8:41am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3549 WPP: 101
Location: The Grind
|
|
| I think it's easier for people who grew up like I did (aka poor) to continue to have the drive and work ethic to put in a lot of time even after they're making somewhat decent money at the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 25 Jun 2008, 2:22am Post subject:
|
|
|
High Card

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 13 WPP: 10
Location: Centennial, Colorado
|
|
| I tried figuring something out for you, but I couldn't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 26 Jun 2008, 6:29am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 655 WPP: 81
Location: Northern BC, Canada
|
|
| spoonitnow wrote: | | I think it's easier for people who grew up like I did (aka poor) to continue to have the drive and work ethic to put in a lot of time even after they're making somewhat decent money at the game. |
TRUE
Also since I've been pretty much poor all my life I've learned how to make money stretch REEEEEEEALLY far and have excellent BR management/budgeting skills. I just continue in a similar lifestyle (which isn't so bad, btw) and all the $ I make at poker goes into savings and BR.
I recommend waiting til at least 100NL to quit your job tho, 1.5 months of 50NL sucked ass after realizing how my disposable income grows by waaaaay more than 2x after moving to 100NL. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 29 Jun 2008, 6:24am Post subject:
|
|
|
High Card

Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Posts: 4 WPP: 88
Location: Mauritius
|
|
| In my country, making $50 per day while playing poker is enough to make a wealthy living even if you don't make it during the week ends. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 22 May 2009, 3:08am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 29 Nov 2007
Posts: 764 WPP: 65
Location: Disturbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 22 May 2009, 4:16am Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Posts: 41 WPP: 44
|
|
| wish u the best of luck if i decide to go make sure the risk is worth it . dont ever see my self going there yet . |
|
|
|
|
|
|