| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 1:55am Post subject: Flush Odds
|
|
|
Two Pair

Joined: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 37 WPP: 56
Location: Austin, TX
|
|
| Anyone know the odds of flopping a flush? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 2:10am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 1461 WPP: 122
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
|
|
| my spider senses are telling me its like 1%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 2:57am Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair

Joined: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 37 WPP: 56
Location: Austin, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 3:07am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 3462 WPP: 153
Location: Ellicott City, MD
|
|
Assuming you hold two suited cards?
It's low enough not to factor the odds.
11/50 * 10/49 * 9/48 = 0.0085 = 0.85% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 3:10am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 17 Dec 2004
Posts: 260 WPP: 120
Location: Sweden
|
|
| JeffreyGB wrote: | Assuming you hold two suited cards?
|
LOL! Otherwise it will be hard!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 3:14am Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair

Joined: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 37 WPP: 56
Location: Austin, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 11:57am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 09 Mar 2005
Posts: 624 WPP: 103
Location: Brighton, UK
|
|
| ur suited hole cards flop a flush only 1 in 120 times |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 3:16pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 1296 WPP: 54
|
|
ya, what are the odds in flopping a straight flush, I did it once  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 3:27pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 2654 WPP: 90
Location: Arlington, VA
|
|
| It's not likely. The exact probability isn't very interesting or even useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 3:40pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 119 WPP: 62
Location: chicago
|
|
ill talk my way through this...
Assuming you have a suited connecter, no gaps 2 cards connect with with your hole cards, 2 connect with those 3, and 2 connect with those 4.
2/50 * 2/49 * 2/48=
.04 * .04816 * .0416= .0000801 =.008%...which doesnt sound right... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 4:35pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 1461 WPP: 122
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
|
|
| odds of flopping a straight flush... that's tough. just looked it up, its 4899 to 1 if you're holding 98s, so .02%. someone on here might know how to figure it but not me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 5:02pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 2654 WPP: 90
Location: Arlington, VA
|
|
| thestrokes wrote: | ill talk my way through this...
Assuming you have a suited connecter, no gaps 2 cards connect with with your hole cards, 2 connect with those 3, and 2 connect with those 4.
2/50 * 2/49 * 2/48=
.04 * .04816 * .0416= .0000801 =.008%...which doesnt sound right... |
What? These numbers don't make any sense at all. With two suited pocket cards, there are 11 remaining cards of the appropriate suit left in the deck with 50 unseen cards before the flop. Since one of these has to fall, followed by another, followed by another, the probability is 11/50 * 10/49 * 9/48. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 6:20pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 16 Jan 2005
Posts: 92 WPP: 31
|
|
| ive flopped a straight flush once too. had 97 hearts flop came 6 8 10 of hearts, it was nice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 6:23pm Post subject:
|
|
|
LAME HUMOR THAT MAKES FISH LAUGH

Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 8092 WPP: 75
Location: This room is a good place to be
|
|
| mimmons775 wrote: | | ive flopped a straight flush once too. had 97 hearts flop came 6 8 10 of hearts, it was nice. |
You.. mean you flopped a straight flush?
-'rilla |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 6:26pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 16 Jan 2005
Posts: 92 WPP: 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 6:28pm Post subject:
|
|
|
High Card

Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 10 WPP: 74
|
|
| Thanks dsax I've been wondering that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 6:33pm Post subject:
|
|
|
LAME HUMOR THAT MAKES FISH LAUGH

Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 8092 WPP: 75
Location: This room is a good place to be
|
|
| mimmons775 wrote: | | yeah thats what i said |
May bad, I read it as a "flush and a straight."
I'm having trouble reading stuff recently. My eyes are gone!
-'rilla |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 6:37pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 16 Jan 2005
Posts: 92 WPP: 31
|
|
| its ok, you might wanna get that checked out haha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 6:54pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 3462 WPP: 153
Location: Ellicott City, MD
|
|
| dsaxton wrote: | | thestrokes wrote: | ill talk my way through this...
Assuming you have a suited connecter, no gaps 2 cards connect with with your hole cards, 2 connect with those 3, and 2 connect with those 4.
2/50 * 2/49 * 2/48=
.04 * .04816 * .0416= .0000801 =.008%...which doesnt sound right... |
What? These numbers don't make any sense at all. With two suited pocket cards, there are 11 remaining cards of the appropriate suit left in the deck with 50 unseen cards before the flop. Since one of these has to fall, followed by another, followed by another, the probability is 11/50 * 10/49 * 9/48. |
Those numbers do make sense. He was working out the probability of flopping a straight flush, not just a flush. Why it worked out to be higher than the percent someone listed, I don't know (except that perhaps someone didn't figure things right when coming up with that ratio).
- Jeffrey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 7:09pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 2654 WPP: 90
Location: Arlington, VA
|
|
| JeffreyGB wrote: | | dsaxton wrote: | | thestrokes wrote: | ill talk my way through this...
Assuming you have a suited connecter, no gaps 2 cards connect with with your hole cards, 2 connect with those 3, and 2 connect with those 4.
2/50 * 2/49 * 2/48=
.04 * .04816 * .0416= .0000801 =.008%...which doesnt sound right... |
What? These numbers don't make any sense at all. With two suited pocket cards, there are 11 remaining cards of the appropriate suit left in the deck with 50 unseen cards before the flop. Since one of these has to fall, followed by another, followed by another, the probability is 11/50 * 10/49 * 9/48. |
Those numbers do make sense. He was working out the probability of flopping a straight flush, not just a flush. Why it worked out to be higher than the percent someone listed, I don't know (except that perhaps someone didn't figure things right when coming up with that ratio).
- Jeffrey |
Actually, the numbers still make no sense. In order to find the probability of flopping a straight flush, you need to know how closely connected your cards are, and also their rank. This would tell you how many sets of 3 connected and suited cards will give you a straight flush, and then you have to find how many different ways each of these sets of 3 cards can flop. It's not as simple as just multiplying three numbers together and getting the answer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 25 Mar 2005, 2:16am Post subject:
|
|
|
High Card

Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 8 WPP: 157
|
|
The biggest freak accident hand I've been involved in is when I had 45 hearts, flop came 678 hearts, flopped a straight flush! But someone else had the 9 and 10. I lost my stack.
I've also flopped a royal flush, but that was playing limit Omaha, so the odds are better. Everyone folded (probably should not have bet) so I didn't even get to show it down. Hey, at least I didn't lose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 25 Mar 2005, 11:40am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 09 Mar 2005
Posts: 624 WPP: 103
Location: Brighton, UK
|
|
| fluffysnurgle wrote: | | The biggest freak accident hand I've been involved in is when I had 45 hearts, flop came 678 hearts, flopped a straight flush! But someone else had the 9 and 10. I lost my stack. |
Thats harsh! Ive lost a flush to straight flush before in a live game. I've played so much poker online for a year yet the only time ive seen a royal flush was when my girlfriend got one, and she hardly plays. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 2:17pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 31 Mar 2005
Posts: 464 WPP: 122
Location: Love me for a season
|
|
| I folded 76s pre flop in a casino tournament to see, in numerical order, 8 9 10s come down. It was like it was taunting me by making itself unmissable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 4:54pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 20 Jan 2005
Posts: 178 WPP: 407
Location: Canada eh?
|
|
The 4899:1 odds are correct. Here is why.
I'm only calculating the probability of flopping a straight flush with suited connectors with at least 3 cards on both sides that can be used. (ie, JQ will not work since you only have AK above that). To do this, you need to consider all straight flushes possible. For 98s, these cards must be considered:
Looking at the diagram above, you can see that we can make 4 different straight flushes here. Let's narrow down to a single straight flush, say:
The odds of flopping this flush if you hold the 8 and 9 is:
Odds = 3/50*2/49*1/48 = 1/14700 = 0.0068%
(incidently, this is the odds of flopping a royal flush if you hold 2 suited cards T or higher)
Explained quickly, there are 3 cards that can come up on the first flopped card, 2 on the second, and one on the third. Now, going back to before... since there are 4 different straight flushes we can get with 98s, the odds of flopping a flush are the above multiplied by 4. This is:
Odds = 4(3/50*2/49*1/48) = 1/4900 = 0.02%
Good to know that after 4900 hands you might flop a straight flush. Sucks that you probably got it in EP and folded it.
Darkwing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 5:11pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 1296 WPP: 54
|
|
| I've only flopped it once, with 47s limping from the button in a family pot, heh. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 Mar 2005, 5:24pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 475 WPP: 95
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
|
| jmontis wrote: | | I've only flopped it once, with 47s ... |
The Rippy in a Suit
-Chris |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 14 Sep 2006, 4:15am Post subject: Did it Today
|
|
|
High Card

Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 1 WPP: 23
|
|
No idea what the odds are, but I did it today.... Thought I must have read the cards wrong when the flop came.
[/img][/code] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 14 Sep 2006, 12:56pm Post subject:
|
|
|
{NSFW - nipple}

Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 2186 WPP: 107
Location: The Loser's Lounge
|
|
| What happened to DWDuck anyway? Too pro for us now? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 14 Sep 2006, 7:25pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 01 Sep 2005
Posts: 2186 WPP: 79
Location: donkaments weeeeeeeeeeee
|
|
He could compute the odds of flopping a straight flush..
He's a probably a millionaire by now  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 16 Sep 2006, 12:42pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 444 WPP: 118
Location: Chicago
|
|
At a live home game, my friend flopped a royal flush with KTs and pushed all in. Obviously, everyone folded and he showed it. Lol odds of that are insane and yet he wasted it.
It'd probably be better to flop a straight flush than a royal- when you flop a royal flush no one is gonna have better than a 9-high flush so you won't get any play. Flop a straight flush the A and K might believe they're ahead. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 16 Sep 2006, 9:24pm Post subject:
|
|
|
One Pair

Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 20 WPP: 76
|
|
| bigslikk wrote: | At a live home game, my friend flopped a royal flush with KTs and pushed all in. Obviously, everyone folded and he showed it. Lol odds of that are insane and yet he wasted it.
It'd probably be better to flop a straight flush than a royal- when you flop a royal flush no one is gonna have better than a 9-high flush so you won't get any play. Flop a straight flush the A and K might believe they're ahead. |
I flopped a Royal Flush. Double luck for me was that another guy flopped an A hi straight and bet all-in! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 04 Jan 2007, 5:12am Post subject:
|
|
|
High Card

Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 1 WPP: 72
Location: Melb, AUS
|
|
| I had J 10 of spades. flop came 9 Q K spades could not belive it. i checked some guy bet big i just called. Q on the turn i checked he pushed all in and i called. he showed me KQ then i hit the As on the river giving me a royal... would love to know the odds of flopping the SFlush and then hitting the royal on the river. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 May 2007, 5:11pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 79 WPP: 118
|
|
Last night in a live game, I was holding KJs (spades) and called an all-in preflop bet of about $30 (just wanted to give the guy action since I had pushed him out of a $200 pot earlier with TPTK). No more action on the table and I turn over. Flop comes 10 Q A (spades) for the flopped royal. I jumped out of my chair (not over the money, I don't get excited when I win $1000 pots).
The royal pays $250 jackpot there, but just hitting that was a flipping rush. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 May 2007, 3:00pm Post subject: Odds: Flush vs. Straight
|
|
|
High Card

Joined: 29 May 2007
Posts: 1 WPP: 58
|
|
Hey I have a question, and this is because I'm bad at math, not cause I doubt anyone's calculations:
Why is it that pre-flop odds are 23.5% for getting suited hole cards, and 15.7% to get connectors, when the odds of hitting a straight are much better than hitting a flush?
What's the math behind this seeming contradiction? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 30 May 2007, 6:06pm Post subject: Re: Odds: Flush vs. Straight
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 2911 WPP: 107
|
|
| themuckraker wrote: | Hey I have a question, and this is because I'm bad at math, not cause I doubt anyone's calculations:
Why is it that pre-flop odds are 23.5% for getting suited hole cards, and 15.7% to get connectors, when the odds of hitting a straight are much better than hitting a flush?
What's the math behind this seeming contradiction? |
Because you can flop a straight with (for example) 1-gappers, 2-gappers, and 3-gappers as well.
When you add it all up - there are more straights in 5 random cards (and 7) than flushes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 May 2007, 9:13am Post subject:
|
|
|
One Pair

Joined: 27 May 2007
Posts: 23 WPP: 257
|
|
since this is all about flush odds, i'd like to ask another...
anyone know the odds for a flush by the river from 2 suited cards? (i.e. 3 or more of 5 board cards having desired suit)
or maybe someone can give me a hint as to how to calculate these?
cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 May 2007, 12:39pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 2911 WPP: 107
|
|
It's kind of tedious to calculate, but here is how:
There are 13 hearts, you hold 2. So 11 left, and 50 cards left (we just ignore opponents for now).
You can have a flush with 5 hearts, 4 hearts, or 3 hearts on the board, and the total probability is the sum of these 3 cases.
There are formulae for this, but that won't help you understand it, and I can't remember them off hand.
P(5 hearts/5 cards) = P( 1st card is a heart) * P (2nd card is a heart) * ...
= 11/50 * 10/49 * 9/48 * 8/47 * 7/46 - you can multiply that out.
P(4 hearts/5 cards) is trickier, because the non-heart can appear in all 5 spots. Luckily, this is just 5*P(4 hearts/4cards) .
= 5 * ( 11/50 * 10/49 * 9/48 * 8/47)
P (3 hearts/ 5 cards) - (11/50 * 10/49 * 9/48 ) is the probability of 3 hearts in 3 cards - there are 5 * 4 / 2 = 10 ways you can combine 3 hearts and 2 non-hearts, so multiply this by 10.
Add those 3 numbers up and you should get something like 15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 May 2007, 12:46pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 7006 WPP: 71
Location: Pwnsylvania
|
|
| making a flush with 2 suited hole cards is not a 15% chance zen. I think it's more around 5%. You only flop a flush draw 10% of the time dawg. So actually it's more like 3.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 May 2007, 3:29pm Post subject:
|
|
|
One Pair

Joined: 27 May 2007
Posts: 23 WPP: 257
|
|
thx for the prompt feedback, guys!
still not quite sure the truth has been unveiled yet though...
i have been thinking about this one because it seems a relevant number for some preflop situations e.g. how much better the chance of winning a pot with AKs in relation to AKo?
i actually follow zenbitz's argument well and think it most likely is the correct process for doing this calculation . you seem to understand the mathematics in this very well.
though doing the calculation outlined i come up with 9.15% on my calculator. (assuming i didnt screw up somewhere on the line)
thats 0.02% (7-flush) + 0.72% (6-flush) + 8.42% (5-flush)
@bigspenda:
arent you neglecting stuff like backdoor flushes?
cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 May 2007, 4:23pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 07 Jan 2006
Posts: 279 WPP: 152
|
|
| Lithium wrote: | | (not over the money, I don't get excited when I win $1000 pots). |
Was this little (not-so-veiled brag) tidbit necessary? Hmmm?
Kind of a given anyone gets excited over flopping a royal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 May 2007, 6:39pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 2911 WPP: 107
|
|
| bigspenda73 wrote: | | making a flush with 2 suited hole cards is not a 15% chance zen. I think it's more around 5%. You only flop a flush draw 10% of the time dawg. So actually it's more like 3.5% |
Well, first off - you're right, it's not 15% - I think I forgot to divide by 2 somewhere, and it's more like 7-9% (I was just approximating)
I think it's 3.5% if you flop 2 to a suit, but you flop a 3-flush like 60% of the time, then hit runner-runner another 5%, so my 2nd approximation is like 7%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 May 2007, 8:09pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 1597 WPP: 128
|
|
I flopped a royal flush at $10NL once calling a UTG raise from the BB with .
I checked, he checked behind!
I bet the turn he folded.
Profit = $0.85
High rollers look out below |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 31 May 2007, 10:31pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 7006 WPP: 71
Location: Pwnsylvania
|
|
| zenbitz wrote: | | bigspenda73 wrote: | | making a flush with 2 suited hole cards is not a 15% chance zen. I think it's more around 5%. You only flop a flush draw 10% of the time dawg. So actually it's more like 3.5% |
Well, first off - you're right, it's not 15% - I think I forgot to divide by 2 somewhere, and it's more like 7-9% (I was just approximating)
I think it's 3.5% if you flop 2 to a suit, but you flop a 3-flush like 60% of the time, then hit runner-runner another 5%, so my 2nd approximation is like 7%. |
No, it's 3.5% nowhere near 7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 01 Jun 2007, 3:48pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 2911 WPP: 107
|
|
I got this off da intaweb so it must be true:
Flush Odds
You have a 3.3-1 (24%) chance of being dealt any two suited cards. If you have two suited cards, the probability of:
# Making a flush by the river: 15-1 (6.4%)
# Flopping a flush: 118-1 (0.84%)
# Flopping a flush draw (two cards of the matching suit on the flop): 8.1-1 (10.9%)
# Making a flush by the river when you flop a flush draw: 1.9-1 (35%)
# Making a flush on the turn when you flop a flush draw: 4.2-1 (19%)
# Making a flush on the river when you have a flush draw on the turn: 4.1-1 (20%)
# Flopping a backdoor flush draw (one card of the matching suit on the flop): 1.4-1 (41.6%)
# Making a flush by the river when you flop a backdoor flush draw: 23-1 (4.2%)
# Hitting a flush on the river when you have a flush draw on the turn: 4.1-1 (20%)
If you have two unsuited cards, the probability of:
# Making a flush by the river: 53-1 (1.8%)
# Flopping a flush draw (three cards of the matching suit on the flop): 88-1 (1.1%)
# Flopping a backdoor flush draw (two cards of the matching suit on the flop): 6.8-1 (12.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat, 02 Jun 2007, 5:03am Post subject:
|
|
|
One Pair

Joined: 27 May 2007
Posts: 23 WPP: 257
|
|
have found the probability for flush from 2 suited by river confirmed to be 6.4% with many sources.
also i have found the reason why that calculation by zenbitz dont come out with that number.
the 7flush calculation is correct:
(11*10*9*8*7) / (50*49*48*47*46) =0.02181%
for 6flush you had the right idea but missed a term:
(you suggested: 5 * ( 11*10*9*8) / (50*49*48*47)
should be: 5 * (39*11*10*9*8) / (50*49*48*47*46) = 0.6074 %
similar problem with 5flush
2 more terms and it comes to:
10 * (39*38*11*10*9) / (50*49*48*47*46) = 5.771 %
total: 0.02181% + 0.6074 % + 5.771 % = 6.4%
voila |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 04 Jun 2007, 5:46pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind

Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 79 WPP: 118
|
|
| holdin2 wrote: | | Lithium wrote: | | (not over the money, I don't get excited when I win $1000 pots). |
Was this little (not-so-veiled brag) tidbit necessary? Hmmm?
Kind of a given anyone gets excited over flopping a royal. |
Maybe not, but it does give some context as to what a rush it was for me compared to winning big pots.
And I figure anyone that plays poker for any period of time has had their share of big wins and losses, so it really isn't much of a brag. |
|
|
|
|
|
|