| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Sun, 01 Oct 2006, 11:59am Post subject:
|
|
|
Almost as bad as that idiot redgrape

Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 6594 WPP: 74
|
|
It would be nice if...
1. Frist knows that this bill can't actually work, but he's doing it for the reason of getting voters and showing he has good morals.
2. Frist thinks this bill will work.... but everyone in the U.S. realizes he's an unconstitutional S.O.B. and decides to mass protest against the federal government, causing them to revoke the bill, or pass a new one legalizing it.
3. Frist thinks this Bill will work, but together NetTeller, FirePay, etc. with PokerStars, PartyPoker, etc., also with PPA, Abuse their mega billions and take it all to court and kick the governments ass! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 01 Oct 2006, 4:47pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 254 WPP: 77
|
|
| As long as there are Americans willing to pay rake at online sites there will be a site that finds a way to take it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 01 Oct 2006, 8:27pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 3558 WPP: 84
Location: right here
|
|
Phantaroth just posted a scary article in the Gambling Prohibition News sticky. Here's the scariest part:
| Quote: | The surprise move, which is expected to spark a massive share sell-off, will prompt London-listed 888 Holdings to announce this morning that it is halting its entire US-facing operation, accounting for half its business.
PartyGaming, the world’s biggest internet gambling company, said last night that it was “still evaluating the situation”, although industry sources believe it will also announce a cessation of its services to American punters. |
888 Holdings is Casino-On-Net and Pacific. PartyGaming is, well, my second home  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 01 Oct 2006, 8:48pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 501 WPP: 122
|
|
A lot of people on 2+2 that seem respected in their opinion think if 888 leaves Party Poker will go next...
A lot of people are reccomending cash outs...
I dunno, this might be all speculation but it is not looking good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 01 Oct 2006, 9:14pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3037 WPP: 95
|
|
| There's going to be a huge backlash. America won't tolerate this kind of dictatorship. It's entirely unamerican to stop people from a recreational activity of their choosing because some people "don't like" other people doing it. Bottom line it's none of their fucking business. I earn my money, and I can spend it as I choose to. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 01 Oct 2006, 9:22pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 501 WPP: 122
|
|
o rly?
This is entirely American. America has always been sucky.
We have forever limited our ability to be free. Ever since the Puritans and their social theocracy and the south with intense slavery, to prohibition of alcohol, war against drugs, war against porn, war against internet, war against gambling. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 01 Oct 2006, 10:16pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Solicitor

Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Posts: 336 WPP: 47
|
|
could bush just veto the online gambling ban part of the bill?
edit: nevermind on 2+2 they are saying he doesnt have the power to do that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 12:11am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 1461 WPP: 122
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
|
|
| bearcats05 wrote: | could bush just veto the online gambling ban part of the bill?
edit: nevermind on 2+2 they are saying he doesnt have the power to do that |
yea, there is no more line-item veto, and bush wouldn't do it even if he could. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 3:09am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 04 Mar 2005
Posts: 3614 WPP: 52
|
|
| so is FILL_IN_THE_BLANK + WSEX the future for online poker? what exactly does moneybookers deal with? are they all gambling like neteller or what? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 4:45am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 607 WPP: 126
Location: Fold City
|
|
My first thought about all of this was something like "what total and utter bullshit" and I really feel sorry for you guys over there - quite apart from anything else I've had real help with my poker on this site and this could degenerate in a big way if online poker in the US is somehow shutdown.
My second thought is that "this affects everybody". The major players will be changing their business strategy and this could have a huge knock-on effect for everyone. There are likely to be a lot less players - it'll be harder to find a game you want to play quickly and there will be less fish etc. As a further knock-on, this will mean either slightly larger sit down fee's or less freerolls. etc. etc. etc. I mean, really, who knows what this might mean for online poker and how it will look in years to come?
My third thought is that "your money is safe". For a start the banks have a year to comply and many have said that they can't and online sites have said that they won't. There's some mileage to go here and things are bound to change a few times so - don't panic! Furthermore, it would seem that it is payments TO the online sites that are being stopped so you'll still be able to cash your money out, again - don't panic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 5:37am Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
| Rondavu wrote: | | There's going to be a huge backlash. America won't tolerate this kind of dictatorship. It's entirely unamerican to stop people from a recreational activity of their choosing because some people "don't like" other people doing it. Bottom line it's none of their fucking business. I earn my money, and I can spend it as I choose to. |
My view of this is far more realistic.
Certainly it will go to the courts and there lines our best hopes. Then again, those same courts rubber stamped the unconstitutional drug prohibition.
That being said, this will upset a fair chunk of people and open up many other's eyes to the bogus back-door-no-accountablity-never-even-had-a-debate way it was done.
More evidence that both parties need to go as opposition is almost meaningless. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 5:42am Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
| Daniel Negreanu wrote: | | It's all more political blah, blah, blah, that's been thrown at us by a moronic and conservative administration that just needs to go. After this, I can't imagine I'd vote Republican regardless of who runs. This issue hits too close to home and I believe the Democrats would be more likely to legalize and tax online gaming. |
LMAO. When it came down to it the Democrats didn't show up. It's not a partison issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 5:47am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Apr 2005
Posts: 3173 WPP: 88
Location: Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
|
|
| Fnord, think of it this way. If 5 million American adults make it VERY clear that they will not be voting Republican in the next election, things might change. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 5:50am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 607 WPP: 126
Location: Fold City
|
|
| Fnord wrote: | | That being said, this will upset a fair chunk of people and open up many other's eyes to the bogus back-door-no-accountablity-never-even-had-a-debate way it was done. |
I don't want to get off topic and all political but, sadly, all so-called democracies are like this when it comes down to something they want to do.
It's certainly the case in the UK. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 5:53am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Apr 2005
Posts: 3173 WPP: 88
Location: Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
|
|
| So, let me get this straight. Let's say a congressman had a bill which required every US citizen to smear themselves in excrement every Tuesday lunchtime. Could they then attach it to a "free cute kittens for all American children" bill and get it through that way? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 5:53am Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
| biondino wrote: | | Fnord, think of it this way. If 5 million American adults make it VERY clear that they will not be voting Republican in the next election, things might change. |
Where did you get that number from? How many would have voted Republican? Also, will they get squeezed and have to pick the lesser of two evils anyway because the Democrats are fucked up enough to put up Hillary Clinton? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 5:54am Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
| biondino wrote: | | So, let me get this straight. Let's say a congressman had a bill which required every US citizen to smear themselves in excrement every Tuesday lunchtime. Could they then attach it to a "free cute kittens for all American children" bill and get it through that way? |
Yup. They could even put it to a voice vote so it's unclear who voted for what. Then amend the record a week later to insert a paragraph praising Mr. Whitey Establishment for his self-less donation to his State's kitten chairity as said on the House floor by proxy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 6:00am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 1461 WPP: 122
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
|
|
| Fnord wrote: | | Also, will they get squeezed and have to pick the lesser of two evils anyway because the Democrats are fucked up enough to put up Hillary Clinton? |
If i had to choose between voting for hillary clinton or voting for bill frist i would probably saw my head off with razor blades |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 6:03am Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
| Greedo017 wrote: | | If i had to choose between voting for hillary clinton or voting for bill frist i would probably saw my head off with razor blades |
Frist would need to deal with Gulliani first and a whole lot of other people as well. Also Congressmen/Senators have a lot of trouble getting very far in the big show because of the voting record they build up (harder to straddle the fence and stand for nothing like a good little politician) and lack of executive experience. Consider that a Governor has probably said nothing about the real issues, like Farm Subsidies and Federal Flood Insurance.
Also, the Republicans have to be aware that Bush is extremely unpopular. They've shown enough tact to do something about that by running a moderate. I haven't seen anything from the other side of the aisle suggesting a 3-digit IQ in quite some time. |
Last edited by Fnord on Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 6:16am; edited 2 times in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 6:06am Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
Thinking about this more, really the best that comes out of it is that Online Poker won't be "Grey"-market anymore. It will go through the courts and I think round 2 in congress is inevitable.
Best case, it comes out legal and compeition drives down the rake as the big players enter the show. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 6:13am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 637 WPP: 175
Location: Location: Location
|
|
| Fnord wrote: | Thinking about this more, really the best that comes out of it is that Online Poker won't be "Grey"-market anymore. It will go through the courts and I think round 2 in congress is inevitable.
Best case, it comes out legal and compeition drives down the rake as the big players enter the show. |
I like this analysis. Mostly because it's the most optimistic way to think about this issue realistically (of course, there is a worst case too...). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 6:20am Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
The real test of this issue is "Does this make the cover of the next issue of Newsweek, Time, etc.?" I guess that's where the real debate begins.
Do Americans believe that it's ok for 2 adults to wager money online over the outcome of cards? Considering it's the same idiots who think it's wrong to trade money for sex or put just about whatever you want into your own body and hap-harzardly trade liberty for "security" it will be interesting to watch... |
Last edited by Fnord on Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 6:24am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 6:22am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 607 WPP: 126
Location: Fold City
|
|
| biondino wrote: | | So, let me get this straight. Let's say a congressman had a bill which required every US citizen to smear themselves in excrement every Tuesday lunchtime. Could they then attach it to a "free cute kittens for all American children" bill and get it through that way? |
lol - yup. This kind of thing has been sent up in The Simpsons loads of times. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 6:28am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Apr 2005
Posts: 3173 WPP: 88
Location: Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
|
|
I was assuming that 5 million Americans gamble online as a conservative effort. In fact, it's more like 8 million according to this article:
http://www.americangaming.org/Press/speeches/speeches_detail.cfv?ID=397
(and yes, even if 50% of them voted democrat already it's still a big number when elections are won by 0.1%. Anyway - Republican voters tend to be big on small govt, personal freedom etc. so I would have thought that they would be MOST upset by the govt's invasion of their rights.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 6:32am Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
| biondino wrote: | | Republican voters tend to be big on small govt, personal freedom etc. |
Republicans speak to these points, but their actions in the past 6 or so years have been quite the opposite. Also, it's the party of the Bible-thumpers who want to tell you how to live your life. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 6:34am Post subject:
|
|
|
11 OF DIAMONDS

Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 4381 WPP: 117
Location: ISHPERMING MISHIGEN
|
|
| This is some bad news to wake up to........ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 6:39am Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
| Renton wrote: | | America is all about the minority of people. Thats how all laws are created. Five people out of 300 million can't handle driving after they drink two beers, so we outlaw drinking and driving. 10% of gamblers are fucked up, so we make a law to eradicate gambling. |
You couldn't be more wrong. Also, your examples suck.
There are a lot of buisness interests that would love to see online gambling go away. This happened with VCRs, Printing Press, blah, blah blah, etc. Throw in the Bible-thumpers and it's a slam dunk.
Also, big buisness US Casinos probably sat on their hands this round. Grey-market online poker had to be a disaster for Harahs. They own the WSOP and have to depend on a bunch of Foreign Mah and Pops to run the most popular Satilites! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 9:10am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 208 WPP: 47
Location: Miami
|
|
bye bye PartyPoker
| Quote: | The Act is expected to be signed into law by President Bush within the next two weeks. If signed into law, it will immediately make unlawful the receipt by a gambling business of proceeds or monies in connection with unlawful internet gambling. The Act does not clarify the definition of unlawful gambling. However, as the first piece of Federal legislation dealing explicitly with internet gaming, it does make clear that the US government intends to stop the flow of funds from Americans to online gaming operators through criminal sanction. The Act also asserts that, under US law, a wager must be permitted under the laws both of the customer’s place of residence and that of the operator.
After taking extensive legal advice, the Board of PartyGaming Plc has concluded that the new legislation, if signed into law, will make it practically impossible to provide US residents with access to its real money poker and other real money gaming sites. As a result of this development, the Board of PartyGaming has determined that if the President signs the Act into law, the Company will suspend all real money gaming business with US residents, and such suspension will continue indefinitely, subject to clarification of the interpretation and enforcement of US law and the impact on financial institutions of this and other related legislation. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 10:16am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 1507 WPP: 134
Location: moral high ground
|
|
Can somone explain to me why the actual gambling sites like Party and Stars are freaking out? From what I can tell, U.S. law does not directly affect them at all. The only affected parties are banks, transaction systems like neteller, and the players who do the transferring. Unless I'm missing something, Party has no legal obligation to force its U.S. players to stop playing.
Secondly,
http://www.gambling911.com/Party-Gaming-Poker-Stars-100206.html
| Quote: | | The banks have almost an entire year to comply, however, the smaller banks have already stated they would not have the necessary resources in place to monitor such transactions. |
Typically what will happen (at least in my experience with new government Medicare laws) is that the new law will get passed, then everyone that is affected freaks out and says "we're not ready for this! Our systems aren't capable of getting updated fast enough to handle this!" And then the govt says "OK, we're going to create an implementation timeline for you that you need to be compliant by X date."
During the implementation period, there will be all kinds of debate as to what the law means, etc, and various legal battles will ensue, and in the mean time, the system moves on as it was. My guess is that it will take a couple years before all banks are compliant. Of course my experience is limited and doesn't extend to the banking industry..... But I can hope, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 10:58am Post subject:
|
|
|
Eats babies

Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 3890 WPP: 109
|
|
Just a stupid question I'm sure, but what's the chance that these sites are banning americans so quick to get the uproar happening before it's too late. Could they just be afraid if they wait things could get worse. Is it a form of getting the players to organize and feel the effects of the possible ban while there is still time to do something about it. A short term hit for soem longer time gain.
Still think 9/11 was just an attack by terrorists.
Just my conspiracy mind acting up again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 11:11am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 04 Mar 2005
Posts: 3614 WPP: 52
|
|
| Trainer_jyms wrote: |
Still think 9/11 was just an attack by terrorists. |
yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 11:22am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 1103 WPP: 142
|
|
This sucks a lot. But, now comes the personal responsibility part of the debate. This type of thing has been happening for a long long time in the US. The trading of personal liberties for magic beans because a politician screams "won't someone pleeeeaaase think of the children".
What have you, as americans, done to stop this. You may (or may not) have voted. Good for you. That is one small part of what must be done when your freedoms are being systematically attacked. The time to stop this type of thing from happening is long past. It should have happened some time before the illegal wiretapping of american citizens by the government. It should have happened before the US started holding POW's as 'detainees" and torturing them.
Even if it didn't happen before these things, action needed to be taken once these things were brought to light. What did the average american citizen do when they heard that their government was spying on them and recording their conversations, and that the large telecommunications companies were cooperating? nadda.
What did you do when you learned that your government was illegally holding and torturing prisoners of war.... again, not a god damn thing.
This is just the last in a long list of freedoms that have been lost in the US, and this is what sparks uproar?????
The fact that you may not be able to play poker anymore. Not torture, not wiretapping, not any of the other horrible things that your government has done in the name of whatever the fuck they do things in the name of.
I realize that this strikes close to home as we are all poker players here, so this affects us more personally. but we are all freedom loving people too, so i would hope that one of the previous aggressive acts by your government would have spurred you to action so that things did not get this far.
But, as it stands, there seems to be no stopping the fear mongering biggots in the american government, because nobody wants to get off of their asses and do something about it.
If this assault on YOUR personal liberties actually makes you get out of your chair and become politically active, then maybe this is a good thing. Maybe you can then continue to be active and attempt to stop your elected officials from destroying the world.
that is all |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 11:30am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3603 WPP: 99
Location: Your place or my place
|
|
| FlyingSaucy wrote: | Can somone explain to me why the actual gambling sites like Party and Stars are freaking out? From what I can tell, U.S. law does not directly affect them at all. The only affected parties are banks, transaction systems like neteller, and the players who do the transferring. Unless I'm missing something, Party has no legal obligation to force its U.S. players to stop playing.
Secondly,
http://www.gambling911.com/Party-Gaming-Poker-Stars-100206.html
| Quote: | | The banks have almost an entire year to comply, however, the smaller banks have already stated they would not have the necessary resources in place to monitor such transactions. |
Typically what will happen (at least in my experience with new government Medicare laws) is that the new law will get passed, then everyone that is affected freaks out and says "we're not ready for this! Our systems aren't capable of getting updated fast enough to handle this!" And then the govt says "OK, we're going to create an implementation timeline for you that you need to be compliant by X date."
During the implementation period, there will be all kinds of debate as to what the law means, etc, and various legal battles will ensue, and in the mean time, the system moves on as it was. My guess is that it will take a couple years before all banks are compliant. Of course my experience is limited and doesn't extend to the banking industry..... But I can hope, right? |
Q. F. T. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 11:34am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 166 WPP: 68
Location: Boston
|
|
| pgil wrote: |
What did the average american citizen do when they heard that their government was spying on them and recording their conversations, and that the large telecommunications companies were cooperating? nadda.
|
Me? I slept better that night knowing that my govt was being pro-active in seeking out terrorists. No, I do not care that they can hear me ordering a pizza or talking with my friends. Not that I actually think they are.
| pgil wrote: |
What did you do when you learned that your government was illegally holding and torturing prisoners of war.... again, not a god damn thing.
|
See above. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 11:43am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 501 WPP: 122
|
|
That is just fucking stupid.
You cannot possibly support the unlawful holding of suspects, and then say the government can't ban poker.
If you want to give the government the right to tell the rest of the world to fuck off, and ignore prisoners rights, then I hope you don't expect them to uphold your right to play poker anytime ever. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 11:47am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 637 WPP: 175
Location: Location: Location
|
|
There are lots of people like geoffm33 ... that's what allows our government to arbitrarily violate our liberity and the constitution in the name of security (and via the method of coercian by fear). We live in a country full of fascists.
Not my fault.
pgil, I see where you're coming from with the "where is the action" mentality, but the problem isn't that nobody is pissed off -- plenty of peole are. It's that they don't know what to do about it. |
Last edited by thenonsequitur on Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 11:50am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 11:50am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 1103 WPP: 142
|
|
| geoffm33 wrote: | | pgil wrote: |
What did the average american citizen do when they heard that their government was spying on them and recording their conversations, and that the large telecommunications companies were cooperating? nadda.
|
Me? I slept better that night knowing that my govt was being pro-active in seeking out terrorists. No, I do not care that they can hear me ordering a pizza or talking with my friends. Not that I actually think they are.
| pgil wrote: |
What did you do when you learned that your government was illegally holding and torturing prisoners of war.... again, not a god damn thing.
|
See above. |
that was one of the most idiotic opinions ever expressed. you are fine with torture and spying on US citizens??
so if AL-Qaeda captures an American soldier and labels him/her an enemy combatant and tortures them, then its cool too. as long as they label them correctly.
because if you aren't, then you probably want your soldiers to be afforded the protections offered under the geneva conventions which prohibit that sort of thing. If you want them to apply to your soldiers, then you must allow them to apply to others as well, thats just kind of how the game is played. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 11:54am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 1103 WPP: 142
|
|
| thenonsequitur wrote: | There are lots of people like geoffm33 ... that's what allows our government to arbitrarily violate our liberity and the constitution in the name of security (and via the method of coercian by fear). We live in a country full of fascists.
Not my fault.
pgil, I see where you're coming from with the "where is the action" mentality, but the problem isn't that nobody is pissed off -- plenty of peole are. It's that they don't know what to do about it. |
write a letter, write two or three. phone a congressman. attend rallies and protest marches. nothing scares politicians more than a great show of support for sending them packing. that is what rallies are for, they are sabre rattling. you show your opponents that you have half a million votes right here in this small part of the country that will kick their asses out of office, and others do it elsewhere in the country, and they start to get scared and backpeddle.
better yet, join a political action group. i am sure that the bush administration has spies in all of them so you should be able to search government records for the one that fits with your ideas. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 11:56am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3037 WPP: 95
|
|
| Quote: | "The only proper purpose of a government is to protect man's rights, which means: to protect him from physical violence. A proper government is only a policeman, acting as an agent of man's self-defense, and, as such, may only resort to force only against those who start the use of force."
Ayn Rand |
Since no one forces us to play poker, the government has no role here.
| Quote: | "An individualist is a man who says: "I will not run anyone's life - nor let anyone run mine. I will not rule or be ruled. I will not be a master nor a slave. I will not sacrifice myself to anyone - nor sacrifice anyone to myself."
Ayn Rand | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 11:58am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 637 WPP: 175
Location: Location: Location
|
|
| Problem is, members of our current federal government offices get their ideas more from Mussolini than from Rand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 11:59am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 166 WPP: 68
Location: Boston
|
|
| pgil wrote: | | geoffm33 wrote: | | pgil wrote: |
What did the average american citizen do when they heard that their government was spying on them and recording their conversations, and that the large telecommunications companies were cooperating? nadda.
|
Me? I slept better that night knowing that my govt was being pro-active in seeking out terrorists. No, I do not care that they can hear me ordering a pizza or talking with my friends. Not that I actually think they are.
| pgil wrote: |
What did you do when you learned that your government was illegally holding and torturing prisoners of war.... again, not a god damn thing.
|
See above. |
that was one of the most idiotic opinions ever expressed. you are fine with torture and spying on US citizens??
so if AL-Qaeda captures an American soldier and labels him/her an enemy combatant and tortures them, then its cool too. as long as they label them correctly.
because if you aren't, then you probably want your soldiers to be afforded the protections offered under the geneva conventions which prohibit that sort of thing. If you want them to apply to your soldiers, then you must allow them to apply to others as well, thats just kind of how the game is played. |
If those tactics (holding/torturing/wiretapping) could have stopped 9/11 from happening then so be it. So the beheading of peace workers, journalists, contract workers by Al qaeda is OK by the Geneva Conventions?
EDIT: This is getting very off topic so I apologize for bringing it in this direction. |
Last edited by geoffm33 on Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 12:01pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 12:00pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 637 WPP: 175
Location: Location: Location
|
|
| Quote: | | Italian Fascism was not as strict and cruel [as NAZI German Fascism]. It also calls for extreme Industrialization, Agricultural advances, Population Growth, and National security. It is an Anti Socialism or Communism, Pro Productivism, and pro Elitism. It is a government in which decisions are made quicky, solutions are made simpler, And problems get solved. It calls for a Strong leader in which to make decisions and lead the country or region. |
Sound familiar? |
Last edited by thenonsequitur on Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 12:01pm; edited 2 times in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 12:01pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 501 WPP: 122
|
|
You know what would stop a lot of killings...?
A curfew... GOOD IDEA! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 12:04pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Apr 2005
Posts: 3173 WPP: 88
Location: Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
|
|
| You know for sure the world's gone made when people start quoting Rand other than in the "haha look what the stupid woman said" thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 12:07pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 1103 WPP: 142
|
|
| geoffm33 wrote: | | pgil wrote: | | geoffm33 wrote: | | pgil wrote: |
What did the average american citizen do when they heard that their government was spying on them and recording their conversations, and that the large telecommunications companies were cooperating? nadda.
|
Me? I slept better that night knowing that my govt was being pro-active in seeking out terrorists. No, I do not care that they can hear me ordering a pizza or talking with my friends. Not that I actually think they are.
| pgil wrote: |
What did you do when you learned that your government was illegally holding and torturing prisoners of war.... again, not a god damn thing.
|
See above. |
that was one of the most idiotic opinions ever expressed. you are fine with torture and spying on US citizens??
so if AL-Qaeda captures an American soldier and labels him/her an enemy combatant and tortures them, then its cool too. as long as they label them correctly.
because if you aren't, then you probably want your soldiers to be afforded the protections offered under the geneva conventions which prohibit that sort of thing. If you want them to apply to your soldiers, then you must allow them to apply to others as well, thats just kind of how the game is played. |
If those tactics (holding/torturing/wiretapping) could have stopped 9/11 from happening then so be it. So the beheading of peace workers, journalists, contract workers by Al qaeda is OK by the Geneva Conventions?
EDIT: This is getting very off topic so I apologize for bringing it in this direction. |
no it is not ok by geneva conventions. and those who do not follow them should be held accountable in something like, i dont know, an international criminal court. but wait, no, that cant happen because the US is opposed to that, along with north korea and iran and others. thats some nice company to be in.
if you would allow your government to torture people to stop 9/11, then what is stopping them from seizing your property and torturing you in the name of national security?? you may or may not be doing anything wrong, but you mumbled something that they interpreted as 'bomb' the other day on the phone, you could have said 'mom' but they cant take that chance. gg you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 12:30pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 28 May 2004
Posts: 456 WPP: 95
Location: Bawmer, Merlin
|
|
This is a thread on the gambling prohibition itself, not an analysis on the downward spiral of American gov't on a whole. Can we mod this (or police ourselves) before this comes another anti-american sentiment thread?
And yes, pgil, I know many of your complaints/points have good foundations - but we're way off topic
PS, why is this in Commune, the home of non-poker miscellany? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 12:32pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair

Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 37 WPP: 171
|
|
| Isn't the essence of the new legislation to stop un-licenced gambling sites? Why doesn't one of the big casinos in Vegas start a poker site that gives the Gov a cut of the rake? Or can't a site get a US licence? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 12:37pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 04 Mar 2005
Posts: 3614 WPP: 52
|
|
| AvatarKava wrote: |
PS, why is this in Commune, the home of non-poker miscellany? |
it should be stickied in all forums
| saxdaddy wrote: | | Isn't the essence of the new legislation to stop un-licenced gambling sites? Why doesn't one of the big casinos in Vegas start a poker site that gives the Gov a cut of the rake? Or can't a site get a US licence? |
the essence is to stop american bank accounts from funding online gambling accounts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 12:51pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Eats babies

Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 3890 WPP: 109
|
|
Am I not off base here in the fact that the Senators were, and I may misqouote," afraid to vote NO" because of the thoughts put forth that these sites could be used to launder money for terroist organizations. If any of that is true, do you not start seeing the connections to every major event in the last 5 years. Other "communities" have had to deal with this already. Poker is just the next step. this is about control. It's about the red, white and blue machine. Not the average american. But corporations, Polititions, governmens. americans have been too happy,like geoffm33 as an example, all in the name of al quida you and other countries are getting raped and if it stops terrorism, it's fine.
Think about what's next. It's poker now, that's only the start. You gave up your freedom in the homeland security act or whatever the fuck it's called. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 02 Oct 2006, 12:55pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 501 WPP: 122
|
|
Is there anyway a mod could split this thread to put the political stuff in a seperste one? We kinda got off track  |
|
|
|
|
|
|