| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Thu, 10 Feb 2005, 1:15pm Post subject: Critic this amasing laydown!! lol
|
 |
|
Straight
Joined: 06 Feb 2005
Posts: 213
WPP: 176
Location: Denmark
|
|
Heya, ive read in one of the stickies that it should give good morale to post good wins/laydowns instead of bad beats!! So im gonna post this one, its a 5$ sng!
Hand #4373306-14 at SnG-0037s (No Limit Hold'em Sit and Go)
Powered by UltimateBet
Started at 10/Feb/05 11:55:20
WTFadam is at seat 0 with 855.
Golyk is at seat 1 with 965.
mrmccann is at seat 2 with 1270.
Kiriath is at seat 4 with 1560.
HawgWild is at seat 5 with 950.
lroenne is at seat 6 with 1510.
production is at seat 7 with 2015.
ABSOLUTEZER0 is at seat 9 with 875.
The button is at seat 9.
WTFadam posts the small blind of 10.
Golyk posts the big blind of 20.
WTFadam: -- --
Golyk: -- --
mrmccann: -- --
Kiriath: Qc Qh
HawgWild: -- --
lroenne: -- --
production: -- --
ABSOLUTEZER0: -- --
Pre-flop:
mrmccann raises to 40. Kiriath re-raises to 150.
HawgWild folds. lroenne folds. production calls.
ABSOLUTEZER0 folds. WTFadam folds. Golyk calls.
mrmccann calls.
Flop (board: Tc Th Kh):
Golyk checks. mrmccann bets 70. Kiriath folds.
production folds. Golyk calls.
Turn (board: Tc Th Kh Kc):
Golyk checks. mrmccann checks.
River (board: Tc Th Kh Kc Td):
Golyk checks. mrmccann bets 750. Golyk folds.
mrmccann is returned 750 (uncalled).
Hand #4373306-14 Summary:
No rake is taken for this hand.
mrmccann wins 750.
What u guys think ? Should I played differently ?? OR was it amasing ?! hehe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 10 Feb 2005, 1:47pm Post subject: mmm
|
|
|
Straight
Joined: 06 Feb 2005
Posts: 213
WPP: 176
Location: Denmark
|
|
| hehhe, and for the record, im playing qq =D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 10 Feb 2005, 2:04pm Post subject: Re: Critic this amasing laydown!! lol
|
|
|
Season I
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 2360
WPP: 74
Location: Dallas, TX
|
|
| Kiriath wrote: | Flop (board: Tc Th Kh):
Golyk checks. mrmccann bets 70. Kiriath folds.
...
What u guys think ? Should I played differently ?? OR was it amasing ?! hehe |
Um... you won't call 1/7 the pot with a pair over pair? You need to come over to my house some time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 10 Feb 2005, 2:07pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 3289
WPP: 119
|
|
| I'd probably raise the pot on the flop, that 70 bet was pretty weak, the guy was obviously scared of something, so I think he may have a weak king and could easily be forced out to a big (pot sized) raise. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 10 Feb 2005, 4:01pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 2911
WPP: 107
|
|
It is a super weak bet, 70 into 600. It's SO weak, in fact that it sticks of trap.
But even if he has a weak king
1) there is no guarentee he will lay it down.,
2) there are two other guys behind him that could be sitting on a T or K, and on of them outstacks our hero.
It's super early in a $5 SNG... I am pretty sure he is going to get called down by top two. Plus, mrmccann did open min-raise UTG... so it's more likely he has a decent K like KJ or KQ (I guess KT or AT is somewhat unlikely in retrospect.
The other possiblity is that he has a (lower) pocket pair, like 9s. It does look pretty weak with the check behind on the turn, and then a river steal
I could see either laying down the QQ, or raising the flop to see where you stand. The question is... how much are you willing to throw away if you are re-raised by bettor or guys behind. It's a pretty big pot 670 chips; you would probably have to bet at least 400.
It's early, you have no real read... not a bad lay down. Not sure I would crow about it though, since maybe you got bluffed off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 10 Feb 2005, 4:54pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight
Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 124
WPP: 175
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
|
|
| I think it was a good laydown. I lost like 1/3 my stack in an MTT calling down with QQ against a K on board (I just didnt think he had it!!). He never put me all-in or anything like that so I guess he was just afraid of a kicker or something. Shoulda layed it down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 10 Feb 2005, 4:57pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 28 May 2004
Posts: 456
WPP: 95
Location: Bawmer, Merlin
|
|
I make the same play here, given the circumstances.
I'll hope to have a nicer hand to beat them over the head with later - against that board, you're really just hoping to steal the pot, and
- Early in a tournament
- 4 players still involved, one of which has you covered
- out of position
isn't the time to start firing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 10 Feb 2005, 9:02pm Post subject: okay
|
|
|
Straight
Joined: 06 Feb 2005
Posts: 213
WPP: 176
Location: Denmark
|
|
Thanks for all the replys!!
The reason I played it as I did was, one, it was kinda early in a 5$sng, so still lots of maniacs left and I didnt really have a tell on any of the ones in the pot. And two, I found that the easiest way to win this sort of low stakes tournaments, is to lay low during the first half, and then play light agressive when the worst suckers have been weeded out. Theres no fun getting kicked out early cause someone decided he had to go for that straigt draw or something like that.
Im not claiming to be an expert, not by a longshot, I just didnt feel like going into a betting circus with three other ppl when both a 10 or a king on any of em would beat me. And since the pot already was this high, I was sure someone sooner or later was gonna try to take it with a big bet, in wich case I would prolly just fold anyway.
Hehe =D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 10 Feb 2005, 9:24pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight
Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 124
WPP: 175
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
|
|
| Quote: | | The reason I played it as I did was, one, it was kinda early in a 5$sng, so still lots of maniacs left and I didnt really have a tell on any of the ones in the pot. |
Wouldn't you figure this would be a reason for you NOT to call?
hehe  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Tilt Poker FTOPS XIV - Event 9 $500+$35 NLH Heads Up
