| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Sun, 28 Jun 2009, 6:27pm Post subject: collusion or psychic?
|
 |
|
Flush
Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Posts: 277
WPP: 90
|
|
(no chat in converted file)
PokerStars Game #29885494913: Hold'em No Limit ($0.01/$0.02) - 2009/06/29 0:09:32 EET [2009/06/28 17:09:32 ET]
Table 'Pamina V' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: parcharge ($1.83 in chips)
Seat 3: clifflonglll ($2.33 in chips)
Seat 4: Guisseppe ($1.17 in chips)
Seat 6: NotElNinho ($1 in chips)
Seat 7: hugopeich ($0.86 in chips)
Seat 8: ollie.99.91 ($1.91 in chips)
Seat 9: sara34 ($2 in chips)
ollie.99.91: posts small blind $0.01
sara34: posts big blind $0.02
Tomatino: sits out
OLIVERTE: sits out
NotElNinho: posts big blind $0.02
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to ollie.99.91 [6c 7d]
parcharge: folds
clifflonglll: folds
Guisseppe: folds
NotElNinho: checks
hugopeich: raises $0.06 to $0.08
ollie.99.91: folds
sara34: calls $0.06
NotElNinho: folds
*** FLOP *** [4c 5c 3c]
sara34: bets $0.08
sara34 said, "88"
hugopeich: raises $0.70 to $0.78 and is all-in
sara34: calls $0.70
*** TURN *** [4c 5c 3c] [4d]
*** RIVER *** [4c 5c 3c 4d] [8s]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
sara34: shows [Jc Ac] (a flush, Ace high)
hugopeich: shows [8h 8c] (a full house, Eights full of Fours)
hugopeich collected $1.70 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $1.75 | Rake $0.05
Board [4c 5c 3c 4d 8s]
Seat 1: parcharge folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: clifflonglll folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: Guisseppe folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: NotElNinho folded before Flop
Seat 7: hugopeich (button) showed [8h 8c] and won ($1.70) with a full house, Eights full of Fours
Seat 8: ollie.99.91 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: sara34 (big blind) showed [Jc Ac] and lost with a flush, Ace high |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 28 Jun 2009, 7:36pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 7006
WPP: 71
Location: Pwnsylvania
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 28 Jun 2009, 8:18pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 1
Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 506
WPP: 63
|
|
| get this nish out of here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 28 Jun 2009, 9:01pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight
Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 178
WPP: 121
Location: Massachusetts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 28 Jun 2009, 9:03pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 5689
WPP: 126
Location: Ballarat, Australia
|
|
| Its 2nl and the flopped nutflush got all in against a flopped overpair + FD and there was a suckout. Std. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 28 Jun 2009, 9:10pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3549
WPP: 101
Location: The Grind
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 28 Jun 2009, 9:40pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 441
WPP: 199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 28 Jun 2009, 9:49pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Season VIII
Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 2260
WPP: 148
Location: Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
|
|
Do you guys not know how the fucking read? Do you not see the bolded 'sara34 said, "88"' in the hand history before the hands were turned over? Coming from the guy that had the flush draw?
It could be luck, or whatever. But kinda seems like maybe he was typing it somewhere else and accidentally the enter button on the table.
Either way, even if they are colluding, they just felted each other with noone else in he pot, so whatever. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 28 Jun 2009, 11:22pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 19 Nov 2008
Posts: 813
WPP: 69
Location: in my dad's account making him manies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 29 Jun 2009, 4:57am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Posts: 277
WPP: 90
|
|
| bjsaust wrote: | | Its 2nl and the flopped nutflush got all in against a flopped overpair + FD and there was a suckout. Std. |
| spoonitnow wrote: | | Just variance |
I wasn't talking about the hand..i was talking about sara identifying the other guy as having 88 on the flop. and then he goes allin after she says that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 29 Jun 2009, 7:48am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 26 Feb 2009
Posts: 813
WPP: 133
Location: Slowrollin' in the $0.10 DONs 'cause that's what all the cool people on TV do
|
|
not sure how someone saying what their own hand is makes them psychic unless they're blind or were deciding to play with their eyes shut.
as far as collusion goes, no, unless they are retarded and don't know how to collude. i see people making a bet and if the villain things for long enough then they'll pull a tough guy move and say what their hand is (and they're almost never lying because they think that they've mindfucked you when really you just have to know that they're never lying in order to mindfuck you). a tv example of this is in the wsop where the ucf fighter lindell told the opponent that he had two pair (which he did because he doesn't know how to play poker at all and had like 73o or some crap).
it's just illegal table talk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 29 Jun 2009, 7:57am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 670
WPP: 130
Location: Da Fiddy Ennels Sir.
|
|
| Would anyone like to collude on 2NL with me and make some serious moniez? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 29 Jun 2009, 7:59am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Posts: 277
WPP: 90
|
|
| surviva316 wrote: | not sure how someone saying what their own hand is makes them psychic unless they're blind or were deciding to play with their eyes shut.
as far as collusion goes, no, unless they are retarded and don't know how to collude. i see people making a bet and if the villain things for long enough then they'll pull a tough guy move and say what their hand is (and they're almost never lying because they think that they've mindfucked you when really you just have to know that they're never lying in order to mindfuck you). a tv example of this is in the wsop where the ucf fighter lindell told the opponent that he had two pair (which he did because he doesn't know how to play poker at all and had like 73o or some crap).
it's just illegal table talk |
...jeez man. it's not her own hand. read the bolded parts? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 29 Jun 2009, 8:07am Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 26 Feb 2009
Posts: 813
WPP: 133
Location: Slowrollin' in the $0.10 DONs 'cause that's what all the cool people on TV do
|
|
oh...stacks' reply confused me and led me toward thinking they were revealing their own hand. the fact that it wasn't the person's hand who said it was their hand makes me even more certain that it's not collusion, though (all the previous points still apply plus the point that why the f would a couple of people who are doing something that's risking their entire bankroll because it's illegal show off the fact that they know each other's hands.
as for whether or not sara's psychic... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 29 Jun 2009, 8:07am Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 583
WPP: 59
Location: Who loves ya baby
|
|
Bunch of Jennifer Tilly's in this thread.
SARA34 (!!!!!) SAYS 88
HugoPeich (!!!!!) HAS 88.
GAWDDDDDD
I don't know if it's collusion or just some wierd coincidence, but with no-one else in the pot it doesn't matter too much nish. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 29 Jun 2009, 8:22am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 5689
WPP: 126
Location: Ballarat, Australia
|
|
I did misread, thought the guy with 88 said 88.
Anyway, given sara bet 0.08 it could easy be mistyped. Usually the chat would come first but maybe she tabbed out, bet and then pressed enter back in the chat box somehow. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 29 Jun 2009, 4:30pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 441
WPP: 199
|
|
collusion to take 2 bucks off someone....unlikely
cheating so she sees ppl's cards and can fail at 2nl...unlikely
random luck/coincidence with typing...ya ding ding ding.
like really, this is kind of {acronym Renton hates} aint it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 29 Jun 2009, 7:22pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 849
WPP: 179
|
|
| XxStacksxX wrote: | Do you guys not know how the fucking read? Do you not see the bolded 'sara34 said, "88"' in the hand history before the hands were turned over? Coming from the guy that had the flush draw?
It could be luck, or whatever. But kinda seems like maybe he was typing it somewhere else and accidentally the enter button on the table.
Either way, even if they are colluding, they just felted each other with noone else in he pot, so whatever. |
Can you say "felted" in an online game where there's no felt? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 29 Jun 2009, 11:01pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Joined: 03 May 2009
Posts: 93
WPP: 67
|
|
COI
(Coincidental Optical Illusions)
If you are looking for something .....
You may find it ....
Not Collusion IMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 30 Jun 2009, 2:38pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
Posts: 120
WPP: 24
|
|
| Not sure what the motivation to collude would be here. Just coincidence imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 30 Jun 2009, 3:06pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 3393
WPP: 82
Location: the ether
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 30 Jun 2009, 3:06pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush
Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Posts: 277
WPP: 90
|
|
| No-one addressed the possibility sara is psychic..seems like an important read to have on an opponent to me |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 01 Jul 2009, 12:35am Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Joined: 03 May 2009
Posts: 93
WPP: 67
|
|
| nish81 wrote: | | No-one addressed the possibility sara is psychic..seems like an important read to have on an opponent to me |
psychic
That explains everything .....
Nice !!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 01 Jul 2009, 4:15am Post subject:
|
|
|
Strike 3
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 5869
WPP: 52
|
|
| nish81 wrote: | | No-one addressed the possibility sara is psychic..seems like an important read to have on an opponent to me | if I see sara winning over 9,000,000 against durrrrr in HU later this year, then I'll give credence to this theory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTR Everest Poker Mini-League - Leaderboard Results
