|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Thu, 30 Jun 2005, 12:50pm Post subject: and he had...
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 270 WPP: 41
Location: .05/.10 NL
|
|
this hand made me wonder.
PokerStars 0.05/0.10 Hold'em (9 handed) converter
Preflop: Hero is BB with Q , 7 . CO posts a blind of $0.05.
5 folds, CO (poster) checks, Button calls, 1 fold, Hero checks.
Flop: (3.40 SB) 2 , T , 7 (3 players)
Hero bets, CO calls, Button folds.
Turn: (2.70 BB) Q (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets, Hero raises, CO 3-bets, Hero caps, CO calls.
River: (10.70 BB) A (2 players)
Hero bets, CO folds.
Final Pot: 11.70 BB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 30 Jun 2005, 3:23pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 14 Oct 2004
Posts: 1791 WPP: 58
Location: PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME
|
|
Weird. This hand makes me think of something though.
The flop bet, turn checkraise...what is the point of that? Does it work enough to be profitable? People do it to me fairly often, and I'm not sure what's going through their heads. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 30 Jun 2005, 3:39pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 270 WPP: 41
Location: .05/.10 NL
|
|
I check raise very little, but since it was only two of us on the turn I figured he would try and bluff at it. For the past 10-15 hands there would only be around 2-3 people on the flop and lots betting with shit hands.
Based on my read i figured i would try a check raise, no its not always profitable, especially at these limits. If my reasoning is wrong please explain. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 4 Hours |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot rate topics in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
.
Forum style based on NoseBleed by mikelothar.com.
|