| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Wed, 04 Nov 2009, 8:18pm Post subject: 2NL 6max 7.7k Hands
|
 |
|
Straight
Joined: 09 Jan 2009
Posts: 115
WPP: 48
|
|
 |
Last edited by Schya on Wed, 04 Nov 2009, 10:50pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 04 Nov 2009, 9:10pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 111
WPP: 59
|
|
| stop posting stats with 7.7k and just play. Experience and studying is all you need. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 04 Nov 2009, 9:20pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 5681
WPP: 126
Location: Ballarat, Australia
|
|
| Play tighter OOP and looser IP (when folded to you). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 04 Nov 2009, 10:51pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3542
WPP: 101
Location: The Grind
|
|
| Quote: | <Schya> i need to straighten my ass out.... and for real do some learning
<Schya> and not just fucking play
<Schya> i guess "i didnt need to study to beat 2nl"
<Schya> but apparently im not even good enough for there yet |
As played, tighten up in EP and maybe loosen up in LP. I asked you in IRC right now what your steal % was over this sample since I don't see it in the stats, and you said 21%. It should be higher than that, so you might want to read an old post of mine Blind Stealing 101. It has a lot in common with this other post I made around the same time about Raising Behind Limpers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 04 Nov 2009, 11:31pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 19 Nov 2008
Posts: 813
WPP: 69
Location: in my dad's account making him manies
|
|
| the fact that you are losing money on the button shows that this is nowhere near a meaningful sample size |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 05 Nov 2009, 1:16pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 3037
WPP: 73
Location: Not Giving In
|
|
If this was a meaningful sample:
You're calling 3bets 54% of the time? Please tell me with what. Get your PFR closer to VPIP. Is 3betting that light at these stakes profitable? Steal a lot more. You can with ATC sometimes given the right conditions. Do you limp behind a lot? Anyways, way too small of a sample but try out some filters I guess. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 05 Nov 2009, 2:43pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3542
WPP: 101
Location: The Grind
|
|
| -23 ptbb/100 over 11k hands is a sufficient sample. Please stop with this "small sample size" nonsense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 05 Nov 2009, 2:54pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Joined: 25 Nov 2008
Posts: 78
WPP: 17
Location: Grinding In New Jersey!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 05 Nov 2009, 4:02pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House
Joined: 19 Nov 2008
Posts: 813
WPP: 69
Location: in my dad's account making him manies
|
|
| I guess you could also be really bad. Those are the two options: this sample size is too small or you are just really horrifically awful |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 05 Nov 2009, 6:56pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair
Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Posts: 49
WPP: 72
Location: Calgary
|
|
| Parasurama wrote: | | I guess you could also be really bad. Those are the two options: this sample size is too small or you are just really horrifically awful |
Maybe he should be playing FR instead of 6max b/c post flop play is lacking??? i dunno |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 05 Nov 2009, 7:30pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3542
WPP: 101
Location: The Grind
|
|
| nonofyobiz wrote: | | Parasurama wrote: | | I guess you could also be really bad. Those are the two options: this sample size is too small or you are just really horrifically awful |
Maybe he should be playing FR instead of 6max b/c post flop play is lacking??? i dunno |
Yeah because full ring is a 1-street game and there is no betting after the flop. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 05 Nov 2009, 11:50pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 3037
WPP: 73
Location: Not Giving In
|
|
Full ring has postflop play but it's def. easier than 6max which is probably what he was getting at.
I will agree that having that winrate over 11k (I thought it was 7.7k?) hands means you most likely have leaks though and the sample size, though small, is decent enough. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 06 Nov 2009, 12:10am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 5681
WPP: 126
Location: Ballarat, Australia
|
|
| I think the point is that while some stat-work might help, that loss rate indicates theres probably some pretty bad play going on somewhere. Start posting hands. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 06 Nov 2009, 12:12am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 5681
WPP: 126
Location: Ballarat, Australia
|
|
| kmind wrote: | | I will agree that having that winrate over 11k (I thought it was 7.7k?) hands means you most likely have leaks though and the sample size, though small, is decent enough. |
Its 7.7k. Hard to make judgements on some stat based numbers, but enough that the winrate is significant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 06 Nov 2009, 12:51am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 3037
WPP: 73
Location: Not Giving In
|
|
| Yeah. That's what I was trying to say if it came off differently. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 06 Nov 2009, 1:05am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 3542
WPP: 101
Location: The Grind
|
|
| Crap I read the wrong number. Wtf is the 11k number anyway? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusive FTR $200 Money Added Event at PokerStars, Nov 21
