| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Sun, 30 Mar 2008, 8:46am Post subject: $11 - pocket fives weird stack size
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 728 WPP: 71
Location: screw sngs
|
|
Didn't know what to do with this due to my stack size.. Higher I would std raise, lower I would push..
Full Tilt Poker, $10 + $1 NL Hold'em Sit n' Go, 40/80 Blinds, 5 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter
CO: 1,725
Hero (BTN): 1,050
SB: 4,763
BB: 3,047
UTG: 2,915
Pre-Flop: (120) 5 5 dealt to Hero (BTN)
2 folds, Hero ??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 30 Mar 2008, 9:10am Post subject:
|
|
|
Two Pair

Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 30 WPP: 95
|
|
| Urgh. I think I push all-in. I don't like limping because unless we hit a set we're playing blind. Raise of 3-4BB seems ok, but if re-raised I'm all in. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 30 Mar 2008, 11:28am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 17 Feb 2008
Posts: 200 WPP: 109
|
|
| Im a) folding this, 55 is not an ideal hand to push with or b) set farming....limp in and if you hit get your stack in, if you miss check/fold flop..I really dont think a push is a goood play here considering you only get 120 chips if nobody calls and if they do call your a 50/50 at best.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 30 Mar 2008, 3:00pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 2095 WPP: 101
|
|
| I'm guessing if you plug this into SNGWIZ it would say to push |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 30 Mar 2008, 5:27pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 5681 WPP: 126
Location: Ballarat, Australia
|
|
| It should say to fold I think. Be interested to find out. I need something like 88+ to push here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 30 Mar 2008, 5:36pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 930 WPP: 65
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun, 30 Mar 2008, 5:40pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 621 WPP: 141
Location: UK
|
|
| bjsaust wrote: | | I need something like 88+ to push here. |
Yeah, I agree with this. Sometimes I may even push with 77 but I would fold 55. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 4:11pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Posts: 602 WPP: 78
Location: In your fridge
|
|
| I think its a shove if blinds are 50/100 or more but now its a fold. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon, 31 Mar 2008, 11:53pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 1144 WPP: 162
Location: Billings, Montana
|
|
| still have an M of less than 10.. But you're flipping against most callers.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Apr 2008, 12:09am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 5681 WPP: 126
Location: Ballarat, Australia
|
|
Hmm, I decided to run this through SNGPT and its more interesting than I thought.
This seems to be a real turning point for pushing ranges. Here are my default calling ranges (from really tight to really loose) and the ranges we'd push. This assumes both call equal ranges:
66+,AT+ - 33+,AKs,AQs,AJs,ATs,ATo+,A9s,A8s,A7s,A5s,KJo+,K9s+,QJo,Q9s+,J9s+,T9s
44+,A7+,KJ+ - 66+,ATo+,A9s+
22+,A2+,KT+,QJ - 55+,ATo+,A8s+
22+,A2+,K9+,KJo+,QT+,JT - 66+,A9o+,A8s+
Hard to say what range they'd call with here. A 12.5xBB push will normally be called fairly tightly, but then in this case its no more than 1/3 of the stack of either opp, so they may feel like gambling.
I suspect this is close enough that I probably fold, but my initial pushing range was a fair way off apparantly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 01 Apr 2008, 1:36am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight Flush

Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 4628 WPP: 65
Location: Stars $16 and $27 Sngs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 03 Apr 2008, 12:01am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 3462 WPP: 153
Location: Ellicott City, MD
|
|
I push as well. A standard raise isn't horrible though, especially if opponents have a tendency to call and then check/fold flops. Or if they have shown they will call pushes with a wide range preflop.
Limping for set value is ridiculous. In fact, calling for set value after the first two levels is rarely correct in SNG play. The stacks are just too shallow for it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|