| Author |
Message |
|
Posted: Tue, 15 Aug 2006, 1:41pm Post subject: ...
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 863 WPP: 161
|
|
| ... |
Last edited by aokrongly on Tue, 22 Jan 2008, 1:19pm; edited 2 times in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 15 Aug 2006, 1:45pm Post subject:
|
|
|
|
|
I like the concept, and think it rings true as a general principle. That's not to say that taking down pots with C-Bets and the little things arent important.
But on their own they won't make you into a big winner.
Another thought i had, was something along the line of the 1% rule. Where basically all your winnings come from your best 1% of total hands, or losses for that matter.
So it is the big pots that make or break you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 15 Aug 2006, 3:32pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 3558 WPP: 84
Location: right here
|
|
| I think these are good. I looked at my PT stats just now to check the 80/20 rule and of hands I haven't folded, I've won 75% of my total with 3-of-a-kind or better. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 15 Aug 2006, 4:11pm Post subject:
|
|
|
11 OF DIAMONDS

Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 4380 WPP: 117
Location: ISHPERMING MISHIGEN
|
|
| Kinda reminds me of Colin Powell's 40/70 rule. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 15 Aug 2006, 5:25pm Post subject:
|
|
|
One Pair

Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 23 WPP: 92
|
|
I think thoughs rules might be a litle broad to be considered universal rules. The style I play is kind like short ball. I take doun so many small pots that when Im finaly in a big pot im playing with there chips. I realy think I make more money in all these small pots than in the big ones. I can back eny of this up with fact because I play live and dont have eny way of actualy tracking it. My only point is that your style, and the style of your oponents determins if these rules hold true for you or not.
P.S. I know I cant spell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 15 Aug 2006, 6:45pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 12 Sep 2005
Posts: 838 WPP: 207
Location: The Internetz
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 15 Aug 2006, 7:07pm Post subject:
|
|
|
OLD MAN RIVER

Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3687 WPP: 80
Location: Canuckistan
|
|
aok:
for made hands, it's more like 90/10, in my db anyway.
~30K hands, in descending order of value:
Net Winners:
full house (1.31%)
three of a kind (3.53%)
flush (1.57%)
straight (2.70%)
four of a kind (0.09%)
straight flush(0.01%)
Total: 9.21% of total hands
Net Losers:
two pair (14%)
one pair (44%)
high card (32%)
80/20 would be about right for starting hands though... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 15 Aug 2006, 7:31pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 3556 WPP: 112
Location: at your tables, calling your bets
|
|
Obviously this depends on who your opponents are. In general, there are two different types of bad players that we make money from: bad players who call too much, and bad players who fold too much. Against the first type of bad player, we might earn 80% of our money by making good hands like full houses, straights, and flushes and getting paid off, and 20% of our money by bluffing or taking down small pots with weaker hands. Against the second type of bad player, we might earn 80% of our money by bluffing them out of the pot and 20% of our money by making good hands.
Most 10NL and 25NL tables are full of the first type of player so aok's rule is usually applicable there. But you'll also see players who are down to the last money in their account and are scared to lose it all, so they won't call it off without the nuts or close to it. And finally, there are players at every level who will not only heavily contest pots with top pair weak kicker, but also with bottom pair, a draw, or absolutely nothing. You have to know your opponents. If you fold good one pair hands every time there's a bet and a raise on the flop, you're just transforming yourself from one type of fish into another. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue, 15 Aug 2006, 11:24pm Post subject: ...
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 863 WPP: 161
|
|
| ... |
Last edited by aokrongly on Tue, 22 Jan 2008, 2:33pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16 Aug 2006, 9:00am Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 22 Apr 2005
Posts: 3173 WPP: 88
Location: Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
|
|
| I consider myself a more able smallball player than big pot player (my biggest leak is getting value on my monster hands), but I would say that I double up 10% of the time thanks to many small pots and 90% of the time by winning one or more 100BB+ pots. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16 Aug 2006, 12:50pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 822 WPP: 73
Location: wisconsin
|
|
You make/lose the most money in the big pots. Tight players play more big pots with good starting hands. You will really lose money when you hang on to your good starting hands, but continue to make big pots unimproved.
Something doesnt sit right with me calling it an 80/20 rule. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16 Aug 2006, 1:54pm Post subject: ...
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 863 WPP: 161
|
|
| ... |
Last edited by aokrongly on Tue, 22 Jan 2008, 2:30pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16 Aug 2006, 2:03pm Post subject:
|
|
|
OLD MAN RIVER

Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3687 WPP: 80
Location: Canuckistan
|
|
| aokrongly wrote: | | what would you call it |
The 90/10 rule.
| Warpe wrote: | aok:
for made hands, it's more like 90/10, in my db anyway.
~30K hands, in descending order of value:
Net Winners:
full house (1.31%)
three of a kind (3.53%)
flush (1.57%)
straight (2.70%)
four of a kind (0.09%)
straight flush(0.01%)
Total: 9.21% of total hands
Net Losers:
two pair (14%)
one pair (44%)
high card (32%)
80/20 would be about right for starting hands though... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16 Aug 2006, 2:55pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 3556 WPP: 112
Location: at your tables, calling your bets
|
|
| aokrongly wrote: | | mcatdog wrote: | | If you fold good one pair hands every time there's a bet and a raise on the flop, you're just transforming yourself from one type of fish into another. |
I disagree. I think that it will work with aggressors as well as fish. It's just that 35% tables (which is how I label the type of play you're talking about) require a different strategy. However, the same 80/20 rule will apply only this time you're using the aggressor's weight against himself. But you'll be doing it with the top 20% and the aggressor will be losing to the top 20%. |
Unless the aggressor sucks, you won't make enough money off your nut hands to make up for all the times you fold the best hand to him. If you're folding to a bet and a raise unless you have 2 pair or better, then when you don't fold, he'll know you have a huge hand and won't put any more money in unless he has one too.
| Quote: |
I do agree that there are different ways this rule manifests itself. And maybe I haven't played a purely aggressive game enough to see myself make 80% of my money off bluffs. But I find it highly unusual. If that's the case with you, then you have absolutely cracked the case on how to let pots grow and then steal them. For that to be the case it would have to break both AOK's Highly Contested Pot Rule and the 80/20 rule. (and since i've never been wrong TWICE, that's impossible.) |
Well first of all, I definitely haven't mastered the aggressive style. I'm trying to get better at it, but I'm not there yet. I've played against this type of player though and I think they can be really hard to play against. Second, I don't think anyone makes 80% of all their money off bluffs. But, there are opponents against whom that'll be true. For example, if you're playing heads-up against someone who folds too much, you'll make most of your money off bluffs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16 Aug 2006, 3:07pm Post subject: ...
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 863 WPP: 161
|
|
| ... |
Last edited by aokrongly on Tue, 22 Jan 2008, 2:29pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16 Aug 2006, 3:11pm Post subject: ...
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 863 WPP: 161
|
|
| ... |
Last edited by aokrongly on Tue, 22 Jan 2008, 2:29pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16 Aug 2006, 6:12pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 136 WPP: 233
Location: Ft. Worth, Tejas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16 Aug 2006, 7:05pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Royal Flush

Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 18762 WPP: 81
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
|
|
AOK,
The way to make lots of money playing NLHE is to put vastly different amounts of money into the pot with the same holding against different types of players.
3 and 4 way pots contested among sane players for meaningful stakes are often reduced to painted forehead problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16 Aug 2006, 7:22pm Post subject:
|
|
|
4-of-a-Kind

Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 2759 WPP: 83
|
|
qft
This is a general rule of thumb that applies to everything, or atleast is given as advice on everything.. "deal with the 20% biggest troublemakers in class and you'll solve 80% of the problem" etc.. a bit silly for anyone to claim it as their own invention.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16 Aug 2006, 8:25pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 822 WPP: 73
Location: wisconsin
|
|
| aokrongly wrote: | | I like the 10/90 |
Now THIS is a 10/90!
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16 Aug 2006, 9:09pm Post subject: ...
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 863 WPP: 161
|
|
| ... |
Last edited by aokrongly on Tue, 22 Jan 2008, 2:28pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 17 Aug 2006, 12:29am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 136 WPP: 233
Location: Ft. Worth, Tejas
|
|
| jackvance wrote: |
qft
This is a general rule of thumb that applies to everything, or atleast is given as advice on everything.. "deal with the 20% biggest troublemakers in class and you'll solve 80% of the problem" etc.. a bit silly for anyone to claim it as their own invention.. |
Pareto is actually where the rule of thumb comes from. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 17 Aug 2006, 12:30am Post subject:
|
|
|
Straight

Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 136 WPP: 233
Location: Ft. Worth, Tejas
|
|
| TerryToma wrote: | | aokrongly wrote: | | I like the 10/90 |
Now THIS is a 10/90!
|
Shocking. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 17 Aug 2006, 11:36am Post subject: ...
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 863 WPP: 161
|
|
| ... |
Last edited by aokrongly on Tue, 22 Jan 2008, 2:28pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 17 Aug 2006, 11:44am Post subject:
|
|
|
Eats babies

Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 3885 WPP: 109
|
|
Don't bet 90% of your stack on a hand that's not in the top 10% of your PT database.
LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 17 Aug 2006, 11:51am Post subject:
|
|
|
OLD MAN RIVER

Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3687 WPP: 80
Location: Canuckistan
|
|
| Be a nutcamping nit. There's nothing new about that advice for a beginner. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 17 Aug 2006, 11:53am Post subject: ...
|
|
|
Full House

Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 863 WPP: 161
|
|
| ... |
Last edited by aokrongly on Tue, 22 Jan 2008, 2:26pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu, 17 Aug 2006, 12:08pm Post subject:
|
|
|
OLD MAN RIVER

Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3687 WPP: 80
Location: Canuckistan
|
|
| aokrongly wrote: | | AOK's 90/10 [Rule] |
It was 80/20 until I gave you the stats. I'm suing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|